Jump to content

Talk:Star Trek/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 21:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]


Pass

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    The reliable sources look good enough. However, I am concerned that IMDB is not really considered a reliable source, and they should be removed and replaced with the appropriate citations. Referencing styles also need to be consistent as well.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Nice work on getting the article up to GA status.


Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]