Talk:Tailored Films

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Filmmaking

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Tony Quinn

Given the substance of much of the content produced by Tailored Films, I think it is appropriate to highlight the potential source for the moralising content this company produces. I noted a newly created account with no previous edits removed reference to Quinn. Something that happened in 2022 which placed his page under protective measures. It is interesting this happens whenever someone mentions Quinn.

Given this page appears to have been written by a marketeer rather than an editor please be mindful of not cleansing this page of content that the subject of the page would prefer removed. This is Wikipedia. Not the subject's private webpage. Nofoolie (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrtyzxylu13 please address your removal of this content here Nofoolie (talk) 10:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrtyzxylu13

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tailored Films. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please explain this revert

@Wrtyzxylu13

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

@Wrtyzxylu13

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

@Wrtyzxylu13

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tailored Films.