Jump to content

Talk:War guilt question

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]
[edit]
In-link checklist

The following articles might be worth looking at as possible in-links to this article, after release to mainspace.

Mathglot (talk) 12:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Others

Redirects needed

[edit]

Mathglot (talk) 10:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About the title

[edit]

Q: Why is this article called "War guilt question", when every other Wikipedia calls it the same thing, after the German word for it?

A: Because a careful search of books and other reliable sources in English, shows that the English phrase is the more common one in English sources. Sources generally do mention the German word from which the English calque is derived, but then they use the English expression, or after the first time, a shortened version of it ("the question", "the issue", etc.). There are some English sources that do use the German word throughout, but they are a minority.

Q: What about the capitalization? Why not, "War Guilt Question"?

A: Same as above. Mathglot (talk) 10:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It also has other names in English, including: war guilt thesis, question of German guilt, question of German war guilt, and war guilt problem. But some are just elegant variation, and none are as common in English as "war guilt question", which started to appear almost immediately, for example in 1920,[1] and 1930.[2]

References

  1. ^ Tardieu, Andre (1920). Eliakim Littell; Robert S. Littell (eds.). "France and Great Britain (from: [L'Illustration (Illustrated Literary Weekly) April 17])". The Living Age... Vol. 8. Boston: Littell, Son and Company. p. 567.
  2. ^ Koch-Weser, Erich (1930). Germany in the Post-war World. Philadelphia: Dorrance, Incorporated. p. 213. OCLC 24973903.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathglot (talkcontribs) 00:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Two articles on foreign Wikipedias have "Featured article" status: the French article, and the German article. (Note that they have the same name; the French article borrowed the German word as the title, because that's what reliable sources in French do.) Details on the section structure of these two articles follows. Mathglot (talk) 00:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The section structure of the French Featured Article fr:Kriegsschuldfrage with translated section headers can be viewed in its entirety at User:Mathglot/sandbox/War guilt question/French article sections. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the section organization from rev 202268988 of the German Featured Article de:Kriesgsschuldfrage, translated into English. It can be viewed at User:Mathglot/sandbox/War guilt question/German article sections. Mathglot (talk) 03:25, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Launch prep

[edit]
Checklist of tasks for draft prep before and at launch
  • unchecked box Complete initial translations.
  • unchecked box Mark expansion possibilities where only partly translated. (indicate useful, underutilized sources)
  • unchecked box Brief intro paragraphs for #In the Weimar Republic, #Treaty of Versailles, #Reactions, #In other countries, #Post World War II.
  • unchecked box Section #Dealing with the issue and responsibilities: not clear what the unifying theme is of this H3; also, needs intro para. Mathglot (talk) 21:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • unchecked box Section retitling and re-org – some of the section headers are far from ideal (blame the French article), and the overall section structure could be improved.
  • unchecked box Start adding more English sources to the #Sources section, so they can be used to supplement, or in some cases replace, French or German sources if the English sources are as good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathglot (talkcontribs) 22:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • unchecked box Pre-release: check {{Further}} templates with fr/de links, and possibly convert to {{Expand French}} or German. Mathglot (talk) 20:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • unchecked box check Sfn linkage
  • unchecked box Section Further reading: translate untranslated bits (month names, etc.), drop fr templates ('numero', etc)
  • unchecked box Watch for efn notes > 26 which generate 2-letter bracketed superscript [aa], [ab], etc, when they are adjacent to {{ill}}s
  • unchecked box Draft categories
  • unchecked box Draft cruft at top
  • unchecked box Section top links: {{Main}}, {{Further}}, Further ill; ill's in line..

Mathglot (talk) 22:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Launched to main space. Only two article in-links currently; need to provide more. Mathglot (talk) 04:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Erfüllungspolitik section deleted

[edit]

I have deleted the Erfüllungspolitik section and some of the Gustav Stresemann section because they have all but no relationship to war guilt and are written so badly (or at least the French wiki article that they're translated from was) that they make no coherent sense. Erfüllungspolitik wasn't a blanket policy of "appeasement" as the writer of the article seemed to think. It was a focused policy implemented by Chancellor Joseph Wirth in response to the London Ultimatum on reparations (see here): "Erfüllung" means "fulfilment", not "appeasement". Germany did not in any way "acknowledge part of its responsibility for the war" by agreeing to pay as the London Ultimatum demanded. Wirth was trying to show the Allies that the payments were too high in order to force them to be lowered. That was it. GHStPaulMN (talk) 01:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]