Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Goaribari Island

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 03:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Goaribari Island

[edit]

Created by Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by Rosiestep (talk) at 20:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC).

  • Comment: If and when this article is ready for promotion, and if it's feasible, please help me coordinate the timing of its appearance at DYK; I'd like it to be my #1000. Some of you know that I am a cultural anthropologist at heart. I wanted to follow in the footsteps of Margaret Mead and study cultural anthropology at Barnard (my mom's alma mater), like Margaret did. I wanted to travel to Papua New Guinea and do research on its people, like Margaret did. But my dad said no to majoring in anthropology... he wanted something more practical for my university studies. So now, years later, I get to live the life of an armchair cultural anthropologist, writing articles about Goaribari Island and its cannibals. To all the girls out there with impractical dreams, this article is dedicated to you. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Dates and lengths both good. Some limited close paraphrasing of a public domain source observed, but as it is properly cited this is not an issue (see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing#Public domain or free use content). One minor problem is that the article gives 8 April 1901 as the date James Chalmers and his party were murdered, but I was unable to locate the specific date in either of the two cited sources. Ideally a source supporting the exact date can be provided. Worst case, this concern can be rectified by simply editing the date out of the article text. --Allen3 talk 11:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the review. I've added a ref for 8 April 1901. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
  • With additional citation, article is now good to go. --Allen3 talk 02:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)