Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Overloaded: The Singles Collection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 21:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Overloaded: The Singles Collection

[edit]

Created/expanded by Till. Self nom at 06:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Starting size 378 words. Times 5 = 1890 words. Current size? 1101 words. Prose size requires an addition 700 words. --LauraHale (talk) 10:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I will expand this as soon as I get home. I'm at school right now so can't do much yet. Till 01:13, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
      • Have expanded the article. Please check to see if it meets the 700 word requirement. Till 06:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
        • Current size is 1432 words. Another 450+ words to go. --LauraHale (talk) 07:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
          • Okay thanks. I'll try to expand this to that target now. Till 09:22, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
            • I will expand on the new tracks and see if I can make the lead bigger. Please don't fail it D: Till 13:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
              • It's been 8 days since the nomination. Do you have a comparable article you've seen about an album that is 1,800 words long? --LauraHale (talk) 00:35, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
                • I do, 200 words left. Okay there's only about 80 words left. All done, the prose is about 1900 words. Till 12:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

WP:IAR on timeliness. It got to 1,895 words. No plagiarism concerns. Hook properly formatted. One image has fair use rationale and the other has acceptable copyright. Hooked fact found in article.

  • broken link means hooked fact cannot be verified in article. --LauraHale (talk) 10:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
    • It's not broken, I just accessed it. Till 10:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
      • Wait, check again. Music Week did a major reformatting of their website recently, but I believe it's fixed it now. Till 10:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Rechecked url for fact. Link works now. Hooked fact found in article, neutral enough and supported by sources. Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 10:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)