User:Doug Weller/Admin Dashboard
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 2607:fea8:59e1:9d00:b9ef:b90e:9a9a:af4b (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 103.141.60.71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Meyeabrooooooookkk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 64.53.4.124 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 135 five times in the last 5 minutes (Repeating characters, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 64.237.25.230 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 143.55.44.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Astros (disambiguation) was changed by 143.55.44.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873484 on 2024-09-25T14:56:40+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Keelowatt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Killarnee (talk) 02:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Vijay bhaskara reddy k (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Clearly WP:NOTHERE, repeated copyvio and repeated creation of promo articles. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Welcomekoner2024 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Belbury (talk) 11:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 13:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 000099999AB (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Edit warning and making personal attacks. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 13:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 13:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cideator (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 13:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 113.211.116.234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Talk:Hezbollah (diff): vandalism after final warning. — Czello (music) 14:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Bomyy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Keeps placing their website on articles (https://www.kevinwgrant.com/blog/item/understanding-and-combatting-psychological-manipulation) all refs have this link, as well as other promotional links, and they are placed next to legitimate citations to feign legitimacy. Plasticwonder (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:409:400:1836:610E:2024:B423:16FE (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Talk:DNA: vandalism after final warning. ZZZ'S 14:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- AWhitlay (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. WP:NOTHERE. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2406:3003:2002:2D3:97:A359:8BE9:4E4C (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Yishun: Vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 2 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 0 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 1 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 7 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 27 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Starkindustriesgaurav (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 04:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. but seems to be a vandal-only candidate. Watching.-- Alexf(talk) 09:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hethatloathesthelieswearetold (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Isthismyvisibleusername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Dubbleclutchthatswhatmytoombwillsay (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- BankbridgeSchools (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Whats-a-username132 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Idiotgabb3255 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "idiot" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- DigitalAgencyUsa (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Misinformationspreader6942069420 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Steel Hat Productions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Casting about the net, this doesn't appear to be a company. I think it's a person's personal presence on the Internet. Therefore, it doesn't appear to represent a group. I'm declining this for now, but maybe keep an eye on their edits. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tiwarisatieshofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 19:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- PathwaysMelbourne (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See the userpage. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- JhelumiKaBaap (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Offesnsive username (based in Urdu). Would be glad to drop an email if ask for more details, seems an attack on Muhammad Ali Mirza. . Regards, Aafi (talk) 07:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aafi, no need for emails. Just give a clear explanation right here as to why this is a username violation. I tried Google Translate and it did not indicate anything offensive, but machine translation is not good at slang and idioms. Cullen328 (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Cullen328, cool. Jhelumi is a slang often used against Muhammad Ali Mirza, whilst also being an indicative of someone who comes from Jhelum. But in this case, it simply refers as "father of Jhelumi, here referring to Mirza". I hope this makes some sense. Regards, Aafi (talk) 08:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aafi, no need for emails. Just give a clear explanation right here as to why this is a username violation. I tried Google Translate and it did not indicate anything offensive, but machine translation is not good at slang and idioms. Cullen328 (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wearedirtyblonde (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Wikishovel (talk) 10:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- United Reels (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spammy sandbox. Wikishovel (talk) 13:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Amazouz desert (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spamming holiday resort of same name. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Requesting page protection due to potential vandalism following the execution of Marcellus Williams. Kloripanda (talk) 06:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Temporary semi-protection Kloripanda (talk) 06:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals back to re-order/change cast listing after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 07:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of content by IPs from the same location. Soapwort (talk) 07:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of sourced content by an IP. Sid95Q (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:ARBPIA Isi96 (talk) 09:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing from multiple new users (possibly the same under new accounts), restoring a fully unsourced, promotional article. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Confirmed sockpuppetry. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: bored IP without TV or Netflix, I guess, having some fun vandalizing Wikipedia. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 10:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to their recently announced shows in India. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 10:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 10:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: A user is removing redirect and adding only primary sources (again and again) after the page got unprotected. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 11:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined Let AfD sort this out. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Swinub★ 11:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated targetting by the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Magichero1234 sock network which goes back years. Asking for a semi-indef on a topic covered by IPA sactions. Gotitbro (talk) 12:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from half a dozen IPs within the past month, including three within the past week, for an obviously contentious topic in an area under active arbitration remedies. There are six weeks left until the election, and it is reasonable to expect increasing vandalism from all ends of the political spectrum until that event, and that vandals will lose interest in this page thereafter, no matter the outcome. I propose s-protection for that six week span. BD2412 T 12:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Susbush (talk) 12:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lordo'Web (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple accounts. KH-1 (talk) 13:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent high level of vandalism. Vandals are not using IPs. Great Mercian (talk) 13:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – concerning amounts of edit filter hits. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 13:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. If the filters are doing their job, let them keep doing their job. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 13:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by User:ICT Fan. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 13:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Easier to protect the page than to block every IP responsible for changing Daddy Yankee to someone else. Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I would also be ok with pending changes as well, since the vandalism seems to be a little slow. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: Its been 2 months and the edits are slowing down, 2 edit requests, plus most of the drama is on the assassination attempt not crooks himself 2D Is Better Than 3D (talk) 01:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- @2D Is Better Than 3D: This page was protected under the auspices of a contentious topic (post-1992 politics of the United States) and cannot be unilaterally unprotected. Appeal the protection at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 03:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]
| 20 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- GnocchiFan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including 
seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also worth mentioning GnocchiFan created 84 non redirect articles. One article was deleted Sophie Ottaway 8-months ago. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Suslindisambiguator (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to introduce another editor with a strong history of editing and article creation. They have created 2,114 articles, including 2 GAs. Their creations include BLPs, which are essential for obtaining the AP flag. Only one of their articles was deleted in 2023 via AfD, and others are G6. Since then, no articles have been deleted. I believe it would be beneficial to grant them this right to help reduce the NPP backlog. GrabUp - Talk 13:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- I found out after nominating that they had previously been granted AP by MusikAnimal, but it was later revoked in 2022 by Primefac due to copyright violations. I am not withdrawing the nomination, as it was two years ago, and the issue may have been resolved, so let’s see if they can be trusted now. GrabUp - Talk 13:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-admin comment, but I'm bored) I spot checked their most recent creation,Anthony Michael Hillas, made after this request. Compared to the source [1]
Hillas returned to the University of Leeds in 1959 as a lecturer and made it understood that he refused to be assigned duties similar to those he performed at Harwell
He returned to Leeds in 1959 as a lecturer making it understood that he would not work on the embryonic air-shower experiment
His Monte Carlo computer program, MOCCA, for high-energy air shower studies, was used extensively in the design of the Pierre Auger Observatory.
His final Monte Carlo program for high-energy shower studies, known as MOCCA, was used extensively in the design of what became the Pierre Auger Observatory.
He collected rocks, pebbles, and fossils and keenly followed radio and television programs on geology.
He collected rocks, pebbles and fossils and avidly followed radio and TV programs dealing with geology.
- Spotchecking more, like Thomas Wallace (horticulturalist) to [2], reveals similar issues
After sufficient recovery from his wounds, Wallace was assigned to the Anti-Gas Department of the Royal Engineers
When he had recovered sufficiently from his wounds Wallace, was seconded to the Royal Engineers for service in the Anti-Gas Department.
When the land to be sloughed up had a soil type which might prove deficient in some minerals, Wallace recommended the use of indicator plots.
(Fun with thesauruses)When land was to be broken on a soil type which might prove deficient, he recommended the use of indicator plots.
- NPP can't deal with WP:CLOP (or anything but Earwig readable copyvio) and all these articles have been sailing through, however. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done Thank you for having been bored, GreenLipstickLesbian. That was a productive piece of work. There's no way that Suslindisambiguator should be autopatrolled. Schwede66 08:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Benmite (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Seems to be an experienced content creator whose creations are no longer in need of input from NPP. They don't have a clean record of their articles being kept at AfD, but the last deletion was a year and half and 60 articles ago, and looking through a random sampling of their work since then doesn't reveal any major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Greeneyed soul (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Meets minimum criteria, only one article out of many deleted (in 2015). Mach61 23:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- M7md AAAA (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Editing semi-protected pages M7md AAAA (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot talk 08:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Guessitsnotavis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Sock of User:Guessitsavis, used for editing in regions with sub-par internet privacy. Guessitsnotavis (talk) 22:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- This is my sock. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 22:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Done stwalkerster (talk) 10:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
File mover
[edit]- Trailblazer101 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting file mover rights because I have experience in handling and maintaining various file types and I believe my contributions to several files and my various file rename requests as seen in the editing history here showcase my understanding of the naming policy for files. File names are often a decent part of my contributions with film and television-related articles, and carrying out these renames to satisfy naming conventions rather than having to request them every time a file needs to be renamed would prove beneficial in their up-keeping. Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- 98Tigerius (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 17:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- GhostInTheMachine (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I occasionally rename new articles to fix poor titles. I also sometimes want to move new articles to draftspace. Generally, neither case needs a redirect for the old title. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- KylieTastic (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, as part of working at AfC I come across submissions on editors main userpage or sandbox that need to be cleanly moved to draft (i.e. without leaving a redirect). I stopped moving such submissions years ago as if the editor starts another article I was then the creator rather the actual creator which never seemed right to me. It would also be useful for when new editors create/move drafts to the Wikipedia or Template namespaces either in error or attempting to promote/spam. KylieTastic (talk) 12:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jlwoodwa (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I frequently make/request moves – usually either making titles WP:CONCISE, or draftifying/fixing typos in titles as part of WP:NPP. I would like to be able to handle more of these myself, including WP:R2 suppression, but especially WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA pageswaps. These usually require updating the categories afterward, which will be much easier if I'm doing the pageswap myself, rather than remembering to come back once my request at WP:RM/T is carried out. Speaking of which, I've really appreciated WP:RM/T, and if I'm granted the pagemover right I intend to "give back" by handling requests there. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cremastra (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm an experienced user, and would like to help out at pending changes. I know the backlog is small, but I see no reason why I can't spend a bit of time to make it smaller. I have experience in anti-vandalism, and already some *limited* experience reviewing changes at Wikibooks, where I hold the reviewer right (although I am not super active there). Cremastra (talk) 16:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- DM5Pedia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- LR.127 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
While I haven't been editing for very long (only a few months), I have rollback rights and frequently revert vandalism. I also review Redirects for Creation, which is under pending changes protection. I've read the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. LR.127 (talk) 17:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cysquatch (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now and frequently revert vandalism. However, I often come across constructive edits that I can't do much about. For this reason, I would like to have the pending changes reviewer tool to mark these edits as reviewed and broadly acceptable for public view , allowing me to take on new tasks. Cysquatch (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cactinites (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- TyphoonAmpil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello i'm TyphoonAmpil. i Revert Vandalism single August last month. I'm Patrolling Recent Changes, Very High track record over 150 reverts. i use Anti-Vandal. too slow WP:UV and WP:TW too fast WP:AntiVandal. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 01:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 01:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I asked you to spend a month gaining experience. It's been ~2 weeks since I declined your previous request. Sorry, but that's just not enough experience for me to determine whether you'll be able to use the tool appropriately. -Fastily 05:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily sorry. can spend a month on October 10, 2024? †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 07:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- QEnigma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am active on English Wikipedia, primarily editing articles related to Sri Lanka. During the recent presidential election, I encountered multiple instances of vandalism and disruptive editing on related pages, necessitating the reversion of several edits along with sucessful requests for page protection. However, resolving these issues proved challenging due to edit conflicts, which prevented a simple undo and required manual corrections that were both tedious and time-consuming. Given the contentious nature of the period and the number of significant upcoming events, I would appreciate being granted rollback rights to better combat vandalism and disruptive editing. QEnigma (talk) 08:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done You don't need rollback to undo inappropriate edits. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 05:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- Matrix (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have made quite a few edit requests in the Template talk namespace, as well as edits directly in the template namespace. I always test my changes in the sandbox before making edits directly. I am also a Commons admin and have made lots of technical changes in templates there as well. I am currently focussing on turning templates to be dark mode compatible, and many templates and editnotices are template protected. Therefore I request template editor so it can be more easy to implement dark mode compatibility into templates. Thank you, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
(guideline: >1 year, applicant: 2)- (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~4600)
- (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 174)
- (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
- (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: >3)
- (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: >5)
- Primefac (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Matrix, do you see this as a relatively short-term, get-all-dark-mode-sorted type of situation, or do you see yourself needing this for other applications? (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, more of the former. I would be happy with having this right for 3 months or so. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 17:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, more of the former. I would be happy with having this right for 3 months or so. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
- Matrix, do you see this as a relatively short-term, get-all-dark-mode-sorted type of situation, or do you see yourself needing this for other applications? (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
- Done for the rest of the year. Primefac (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links