Jump to content

User talk:2600:8800:6780:1CE3:B44A:D8DB:5FB4:D4D9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bolding

[edit]

Please see MOS:BOLD. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 02:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)\[reply]

I have been editing the Wikipedia page for The Archives Vol. 1 1963–1972 for over a decade. One of the things I've done is bold the tracks that are previously unreleased so that Neil fans can distinguish which tracks are unreleased on the set, and which ones have been previously released before (especially when, without that bolding, it's hard to distinguish the difference amongst all of the credits and info that display within the track list). Neil fans in various fan forums and communities I'm a part of told me that this is very helpful. I proceeded to do this a few months ago on the Neil Young Archives Volume II: 1972–1976 page once the track list was announced for that release, but recently I discovered that all of the "previously unreleased" info text was unbolded by Justin (koavf). I reverted the changes back, while making a note stating that I bolded the tracks on the Vol. II page to stay consistent with the Vol. I page (as well as what I stated above regarding being able to tell the difference between released and previously unreleased tracks). Instead of being sympathetic towards this, this user not only re-unbolded the text on the Vol. II page, but then unbolded the bolded text on the Vol. 1 page, as well. Text that had been unbolded for over a decade. I then reverted the text back to how it was originally on both pages with the bolded, but this user then almost immediately re-unbolded the text on both pages. For these reasons, I believe that Justin (koavf) is a disruptive user and is engaging in an editing war (which, if you look at his talk page, he seems to have a history of). 2600:8800:6780:1CE3:B44A:D8DB:5FB4:D4D9 (talk) 03:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Watch out brother and stick to your guns. This Justin (koavf) guy likes to hide behind guidelines and policy pages but will not provide a viable defense of why your changes, ideas, or use of said style is a bad thing. --Spoondivy (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Check out this Talk:American Beauty for my current dispute with said above individual.