User talk:Al.Khorasani
August 2024
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad al-Bukhari. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also, are these two your accounts? [1] [2] If so then you need to make it clear on the User pages. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Be both know that Al Bukhari is Sodgian no matter what, he is native to Bukhara (which has historically always been Sodgian/Tajik), also may I ask why do you claim the Samanids Empire, they are native to Balkh, are said to have been Bactrian by many sources, if you want to see any of these sources ask me I could talk to you on Telegram/Discord. I have no personal hatred between any 'Iranian' and 'Persian' as we both share the same language and similar culture. Al.Khorasani (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- No we don't. We can only rely on WP:RS says. And why would I go on Telegram/Discord with a stranger? It seems you didn't read my edit summaries in regards to al-Bukhari, please do that. I do not care about our shared language and culture either, it's really not that deep, most important thing is to always treat others properly, no matter what background. Also, you did not answer my question, are those your accounts? HistoryofIran (talk) 13:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- Be both know that Al Bukhari is Sodgian no matter what, he is native to Bukhara (which has historically always been Sodgian/Tajik), also may I ask why do you claim the Samanids Empire, they are native to Balkh, are said to have been Bactrian by many sources, if you want to see any of these sources ask me I could talk to you on Telegram/Discord. I have no personal hatred between any 'Iranian' and 'Persian' as we both share the same language and similar culture. Al.Khorasani (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Tajik Sohrabs per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tajik Sohrabs. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. ST47 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.