User talk:Avakieser
| This user is a student editor in Collin_College/English_1302_(Spring_2019) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Avakieser, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
References
[edit]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.
- While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
- Then click on "templates",
- Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
- If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".
We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you Doc James! Avakieser, the content has some issues, which I'll go into more depth below:
- The content is largely unsourced. All content must have independent and reliable sources that back up the claims in the article. This is important for all topics, but especially so for anything health related.
- It looks like the only sources used were primary, meaning that they were released by Integrated Listening System themselves. This poses a couple of issues. The first is that primary sources cannot establish notability, which is needed to justify including this information in an article and giving it weight. The other is verification based. Primary sources can make several claims and even "puff" themselves up to promote their products and company to the reader. As such, an independent, secondary source is important because they will help verify the claims.
- Be very cautious when it comes to studies and results. Studies are often limited in scope (ie, can't survey every person), so findings are seen as only really true for that group of people. Secondary sources are needed to help verify the findings and put them into context. You should also exercise caution when it comes to studies since some may be sponsored. Having a sponsorship doesn't mean that the researchers would falsify data or set up the study to get the specific answer the sponsor wants, but it has been done before. It's honestly better to not use studies as sources since they need to be accompanied by an independent, secondary source that discusses the study. I'd recommend sticking to secondary and tertiary sources like literature reviews and encyclopedias.
- Be very careful about tone. Avoid subjective and vague terms. With subjective terms, these can change depending on the reader's perspective (ie, one person may see something as the best example, while another may disagree) and with vague terms, it can sometimes be unintentionally misleading. Also make sure that you avoid a casual tone. This is probably one of the harder things to get used to with Wikipedia as all of these are things that are commonplace and sometimes even recommended, whereas on Wikipedia they should be avoided. It took me a while to get used to, honestly.
- I have a training module on editing health topics - if you plan on trying to re-add the content after working on it, this is definitely something you should take. I've also posted this to the page for your partner. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)