User talk:Awil916

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fleetwood Mac has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fleetwood Mac was changed by Awil916 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857361 on 2016-11-25T09:19:07+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:19, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stevie Nicks has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stevie Nicks was changed by Awil916 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916062 on 2017-07-04T16:07:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Your recent editing history at Stevie Nicks shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]