User talk:Awtlncr

April 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland (CDP), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 10:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 11:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with you? Reverting for fun and blocking everyone. You have falsely accused me. Don't you know our edits are on completely different pages? I symphatize with your blindness, but have some sense please. Awtlncr (talk) 11:39, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking and ghosting? Irresponsible. Awtlncr (talk) 13:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awtlncr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock of Sianturiprince. Awtlncr (talk) 11:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. Please address the similarity in edits between the accounts. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Awtlncr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't even know who that is. He has falsely accused me. Our edits are on completely different pages. This admin just reverting everything and blocking everyone for fun, even the constructive one like in 2015–16 Athletic Bilbao season. Please help me @Yamla:. Awtlncr (talk) 11:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are literally evading your block with logged-out edits while simultaneously professing your innocence here. That's an automatic decline. Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User engaged in block evasion, see Special:Contributions/120.188.76.0/22. --Yamla (talk) 10:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]