User talk:Bobberdellakc

Berdella

Merchandise being sold to true crime collectors is hardly encyclopedic or worthy of inclusion here. Regards, --Kieronoldham (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that actual police evidence from a horrific murder was released and then sold to a private individual is the part that is worthy of being on here that is the whole point to this update, not that it was sold to collectors. Sorry if you can't see where that fits to be made public. Bobberdellakc (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also it talks about the sale after he was I'm jail this is the same thing

Bobberdellakc (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

?

The fact that actual police evidence from a horrific murder was released and then sold to a private individual is the part that is worthy of being on here that is the whole point to this update, not that it was sold to collectors. Sorry if you can't see where that fits to be made public. Bobberdellakc (talk) 00:53, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning the "collector and owner of the 'Supernaught true crime website' Kennith Karnig" etc. is hardly worthy content. If, backed by a reliable source, a condensed edit to the structure you added can be found, then maybe. Two paragraphs above I was referring to your initial inclusion. Great and convenient emergence with your Wiki name by the way. --Kieronoldham (talk) 00:58, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should I include a link to the pos website is that proof enough Bobberdellakc (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take it to the Wikipedia Teahouse. They may agree with you but a supernaught website at least on face value is unlikely to warrant classification as a reputable one. No disrespect to you if you are not a sock account, but this is getting tiresome and predictable. 123 and bye.--Kieronoldham (talk) 01:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And who made you the wiki police hell talking about this is not encyclopedic this site is far from a reliable source and I can tell since you block facts

Bobberdellakc (talk) 01:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem. Consensus governs. Take it to the Wiki. Teahouse. Good try. If they agree with yee, I will abide by consensus. Regards,--Kieronoldham (talk) 01:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

?

Also two paragraphs above this you talk about his stuff being sold anyway? Bobberdellakc (talk) 00:54, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tea house

How do I find this wiki tea house? I'm new here Bobberdellakc (talk) 01:12, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Wikipedia Teahouse or Wiki Teahouse. Search the questions/submissions section and submit your issue. Hopefully I will be notified as to this submission. Again profuse apologies if your intentions are sincere. Wiki. is a community and we strive to erase presumptions as to unreliability or bias. If you're new, don't allow initial 'stumbling blocks' to deter you. Sadly, lately, vandalism has increased. All the best.--Kieronoldham (talk) 01:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bobberdellakc! You created a thread called Adding a update to the aftermath section of the page on Robert Berdella at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]