Jump to content

User talk:Cobanyastigi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Cobanyastigi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 12:02, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

December 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Boyabat has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Pi0qAGB_v8, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KMEVsL5jvQ. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:02, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry I reverted your edits - Files doesn't exist. --Frze > talk 10:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files do exist, and you can see them here: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%87ift_ipte_d%C3%BC%C4%9Fme
I uploaded them myself. I will reuppload. I just do not know how to make them visible in this page. Cobanyastigi (talk) 10:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Cobanyastigi: The files does exist only for turkish wikipedia. You must upload them to commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UploadWizard&uselang=tr Best wishes --Frze > talk 10:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grilling

[edit]

Youtube is not generally allowed as a reliable source. Rmhermen (talk) 05:54, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bone conduction. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 18:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

[edit]

About this edit and this one, where you wrote in an edit note: "No need for source for something that can be verified with a simple test. I did. I can speak with authority on this. I am the source"...

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bone conduction. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 18:09, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boyabat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taşköprü. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out unintended link error, I changed it; It is now pointing to the intended page, and not to the disambiguation page.Cobanyastigi (talk) 10:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swing hitch for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swing hitch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swing hitch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 15:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Dodi 8238 (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ney

[edit]

Thanks for helping out with the Turkish ney article. I play them, but I don't speak a word of Turkish, so it's not been easy to source. Question: Can you clarify what is meant by "labial" vs "interdental" technique? Also wanted to add that the word "labial," while in dictionaries it can refer to anything involving "lips," the word is not very commonly used in English except in gynecology.Legitimus (talk) 18:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes unfortunately lips and labia are two different sets of organs but "labial" is used as an adjective for both. There are similar confusions with "blowing" and "fingering" also (even flute in french suffers from it); searches return music related stuff long after genital ones. I added to the article video references to the two blowing techniques. The blowing techniques are difficult to explain by words, drawings, or even demonstrating instructions; one just has to see a master player execute the action from near enough, long enough while listening to the sound that is produced. Video clips are nearest to good help. If you find better ones please change or add them. Cobanyastigi (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the improvements of the fingering table. I was thinking that the angle and the intensity of the blow could also be improved, but could not yet find a better way. Cobanyastigi (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For grouping of the open and closed holes I prefer distance, that is why I was using dots and underscores; the vertical bars are too much like the canes own joint lines. One such vertical line in the Turkish ney is to be found between the ring finger and the middle finger of the upper hand, similarly one between the other two fingers of the lower hand. I prefered to avoid confusion. Cobanyastigi (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That seems reasonable. I'll experiment with a few ideas to see how to get it to appear properly with spacing instead of vertical lines. I don't have any better ideas on the angle and intensity either, unless I get inspired while practicing.Legitimus (talk) 19:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For the angle and intensity I start thinking of symbols here for the weakest winds. They are constructed using svg so rotating them would be easy (the way they are used here). The fingering table needs 7 of these where two will be rotated versions of the weakest. For finger holes I tend to think black means open (dark inside the pipe), white means closed (dotted line circle, to signify imagined under the finger). How do we show partially open? Symbols for moon phases? Wingdings2? Cobanyastigi (talk) 21:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The wind speed symbols look like a good idea, though I don't know how to manipulate the graphic. If you know how, go for it. Regarding finger holes, I grew up playing wind instruments and black holes always meant covered in my music text books and on the printed instructions for many instruments. Other charts on wikipedia seem to follow this convention, such as for the European recorder. There are unicode characters that indicate a half-covered hole, like these: ◐, ◑, ◒, ◓. You should be able to copy and paste them.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stopper knot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whipping. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phragmites, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Balaban and Mey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Circular breathing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carl F. Bucherer's Weighted geared ring

[edit]

In the article Automatic watch, don't you think that the section you added sounds too promotional? Are you trying to advertise a product here or was it unintentional? Holy Goo (talk) 21:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, changed it to a form more suited to the purpose. Thank you. Cobanyastigi (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Holy Goo (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Arcanum (non fiction)

[edit]

The article The Arcanum (non fiction) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (books) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Cobanyastigi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Evking22. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Dashcam have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Evking22 (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harness Bend Issues

[edit]

Hello, as you have done most of the expansion of Harness bend since it was originally created, I wanted to let you know that there were some issues with the article.

First, you have not cited any sources in any of the material you have added.

Second, there seems to have been some confusion, because your additions do not pertain to the subject of the article. The article as originally written was about the harness bend, ABOK #1474, which is formed from one half hitch and one crossing hitch. Your information is about two different double harness bends, ABOK 1420 & 1421 (which correspond to what you have listed as harness bend B and harness bend A, respectively), which are each formed from two crossing hitches, not half hitches as you have stated in the article. The original picture was and still is of the harness bend (#1474), but you have relabeled it as being "harness bend B" (#1420), which is a different knot.

I'm honestly not sure what to do about this, not being much of a dedicated Wikipedian. My first thought was to revert the article back to the April 2013 version, but this seemed a bit rude in light of the work you've put in. Perhaps the article could be repurposed to cover multiple similar knots? I don't know. Anyway, I hope this information has been helpful. 74.75.134.211 (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I did not see the details that you noticed. I checked in ABOK and saw that all 3 knots have "Harness" in their name but all are different. You effectively also provided ABOK numbers and thus the necessary minimum reference I had failed to provide. The page may be enriched as you suggest with these info, and deserves more informative pictures. I will see what I can do, if no one acts before me.Cobanyastigi (talk) 17:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Castel del Rio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ås. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Snyk

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Snyk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WMartin74 (talk) 15:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Cobanyastigi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Campfire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scandinavian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Campfire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faggot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, End user security

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, End user security. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Computer security. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Computer security. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 23:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Algorithmic bias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Precision, Sensitivity, Lift and Recall

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Confluent (Company)

[edit]

Hello Cobanyastigi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Confluent (Company) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TheLongTone (talk) 13:29, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheLongTone,
The reason I added the page for this company is because I think the technology they work with (Kafka) has a great future. It is developed by a major company (LinkedIn), made open source under the wings of Apache. It is already used by several major companies (f.ex. Uber, British Gas as well as seven of the world’s 10 largest banks and eight of the top 10 insurance companies[1]) to handle their huge data traffic, and this company is the first (I believe -) of several to come that will be serving this market growing explosively (700 %/year) supported by the swelling trends of real-time, digitization, telecommunication, data science and internet of things. I do not have any relation, and I know little about the company, so I was hoping others would provide additional detail. I intend to keep adding as I find out more. Do company logos need to be uploaded by the company? Cobanyastigi (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Cobanyastigi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Cobanyastigi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Toponyms of Turkey) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Toponyms of Turkey.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Congratulations on this useful, well-referenced article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lipogram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottoman Turks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beylik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zeplin

[edit]

Hi Cobanyastigi, I reverted your addition to Zeppelin (disambiguation). First, according to WP:MOSDAB disambig entries should only point to Wikipedia articles, not to external internet pages. Then, there was also a this contribution where Jovanmilic97 had the opinion for Zeplin that WP:GNG was still not met, and I agree. Regards --Cyfal (talk) 10:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Personal fat treshold moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Personal fat treshold, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Bileğileme has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Foreign language article with no citations / translation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tamravidhir (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, my fault: I was not paying enough attention to which wiki I was editing. Cobanyastigi (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bileğileme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not English; on talk page creator seems to agree with deletion

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -Crossroads- (talk) 14:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm PamD. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Celtic have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. PamD 07:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: It is alright, it happened to me in other undo attempts earlier. It seems Discospinster and me attempted to undo the same vandalism, I was slower, so my edit ended up undoing Discospinster's similarly purposed completely legitimate correction. This is a weakness of wikipedia as well as all collaborative editing applications, that is difficult to improve, and we must live with. Cobanyastigi (talk) 09:22, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I wondered ... thought perhaps someone else was using your login as it looked untypical! All's well. PamD 09:31, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


References

[edit]
  1. ^ https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2017/05/08/confluent-brings-kafka-to-cloud-and-challenges-aws/#6bc018563050 Apache Kafka Startup Confluent Launches A Cloud Service With Bold Words For AWS

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Personal fat threshold, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Personal fat threshold

[edit]

Hello, Cobanyastigi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Personal fat threshold".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Apache Kafka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pulley model of Trucker's hitch

[edit]

Cobanyastigi,

Two different editors have now disputed the use of your File:PulleyModelForTruckersHitch.svg image. Please don't just keep re-inserting it. Article-talk pages are a good place to start a discussion. And especially, given you already saw one editor objected, don't re-insert it while writing an edit-summary that is only about a different change.[1] DMacks (talk) 17:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern. I thought a correct pulley model would improve, and tried with the best of my abilities, but the result was objected to. Another model was suggested this last time, and I think that is simpler easier to agree upon and adopted it. Please see if that seems ok for you. Cobanyastigi (talk) 10:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obs! I se now the reason for your comment. Sorry! I corrected it by partial reversing of my edit on, not the last but, on an earlier version.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Musicians known for circular breathing for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Musicians known for circular breathing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musicians known for circular breathing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StereoFolic (talk) 03:25, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]