User talk:CodeAcademy

Welcome!

Hello, CodeAcademy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:CodeAcademy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Unbroken Chain (talk) 15:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CodeAcademy

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:CodeAcademy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Unbroken Chain (talk) 15:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --CodeAcademy (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CodeAcademy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Bbb23, I could not understand your step, frankly. Why did you block me? why did you consider me elshadiman ( I work with Farhad Garashov's father, Arif Garashov, and my name is Seymour Jebrailov. Please do not confuse me with elshadiman. Farhad Garashov's article was available in English. He is quite an encyclopedic person and is one of the most famous businessmen in Baku. I want to post and edit his article in Draft. He is the chairman of the public council of one of the most famous schools in Azerbaijan, the chairman of an important state union and the chairman of the public council of a state body KOB. It would be good if you are a little careful. If you want to search the person's name, he is also a presidential award winner. Please Check User and open my block CodeAcademy (talk) 14:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello L235, TonyBallioni, Ponyo and Joe Roe, Please check me (check user), I was mistaken for another user, I was blocked as a result of this issue, I want to create an article on the draft page, what should I do now, I am blocked.--CodeAcademy (talk) 14:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you need a passport to verify my identity, I can send it. Please make a decision about it.--CodeAcademy (talk) 16:50, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CodeAcademy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To clarify why I was blocked. 1. The reason for blocking is not correct, because I am not another user's sockpuppet. 2.My editing was only on the draft page, and my editing was not intended to harm any of the articles. When you look at the history of my editorials, you can see the visual evidence of what I said. 3.Please open my blog and I can contribute to Wikipedia. I would like find sources and references and add them to the articles, and continue editing in the draft. CodeAcademy (talk) 14:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that you were still actively socking as recently as yesterday, the block is clearly still necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you planning to edit with Codeacademy2017 (talk · contribs)? PhilKnight (talk) 15:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what's going on here?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CodeAcademy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Mr. PhilKnight, what's going on here? Am I now saved from elshadiman's charge and then switched to codeacademy2017's charge? my unlock request above was delayed due to this two accounts? I have nothing to do with this accounts. Please check the user. it would be good if you opened the block. The reason for blocking is not correct, because I am not another user's sockpuppet. My editing was only on the draft page, and my editing was not intended to harm any of the articles. When you look at the history of my editorials, you can see the visual evidence of what I said. Please open my blog and I can contribute to Wikipedia. I would like find sources and references and add them to the articles, and continue editing in the draft. CodeAcademy (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Codeacademy2017 is Confirmed by checkuser to be you. PhilKnight (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

what's going on here?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CodeAcademy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Mr. PhilKnight, can you show me the confirmation history from this link? I don't see anything, I checked, I looked to see how it could be, because I said that these accounts do not belong to me. If there is no confirmation, the block should be opened. CodeAcademy (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Because of its nature, Checkuser information is confidential. We do not share it with just anyone, in fact most people, least of all those hoping to learn how better to conceal themselves (as if we can't tell from behavioral evidence alone most of the time).

So you said those accounts don't belong to you? Leaving aside whether we believe you or not (it seems like the latter), think about this for a second: If we unblocked people blocked as sock puppets just because they said they weren't, what would be the point of having the policy against sockpuppetry? It would be toothless.

But none of this matters. You keep socking, you keep requesting, and we keep denying. This is your fourth request in that vein, and ... it will be your last as I will be revoking talk page access after this. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:26, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 07:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]