User talk:Coldstone Steve Boston

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Tommygunn7886 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tommygunn7886. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coldstone Steve Boston (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a sock puppet Hello, I just logged into my account and saw that I have been blocked for supposedly being a sock puppet. I have had no other accounts on Wikipedia. I see that three points were raised to supposedly prove that I am a sock puppet. First the name is indeed based on Stone Cold Steve Austin but just because I thought it was a goofy name for an account. There is nothing deeper to that or a connection to Hulk Hogan. Second, the edit I made to the eye color page was in line with the other edits I had made to various other pages, most small edits. I actually enjoy reading talk pages and previous edit logs when trying to find something on a page to edit. I noticed a previous user had made the point that a point had been repeated, so I made the same edit because I thought it was a good edit. I did not know there was any controversy surrounding the user in question. Finally to the third point, the idea of an obsession with Schleswig holstein and how it supposedly connects to Aryans. I have neverade any edits in regards to "Aryans", and the point I made in regard to Schleswig Holstein was not even my own idea, it came from the talk page on Germanic peoples, in which the users of that page agreed that the Germanic culture came further south than Schleswig Holstein, so I attempted to make page edits based on what they stated. This had zero mention of an Aryan race, and it was not even my own idea or obsession. Additionally, being from a Scandinavian country, I find the subjects of the Germanic people and blue eyes interesting, neither of these are that uncommon of interests for a specific demographic of young men. I ask kindly that this block be reviewed. I am not sure how I can disprove that I am the user I am being accused of because I cannot disprove a negative. I feel that my edit history will show no obsession with any single topic and all of my edits have been made in good faith. Thank you. Coldstone Steve Boston (talk) 19:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Jacob Yaltov, which I'll go and block immediately. Yamla (talk) 12:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.