Jump to content

User talk:DrewPwein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, DrewPwein, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained change of content

[edit]

Information icon Unexplained and incomprehensible summaries are noted. You emphasize the French flag for official use, and you use editing like a sandbox, but now it's censored today. If the source is not clearly presented, rollback may eventually be the answer. The contribution you made at Wallis and Futuna has been cancelled. Please excuse me. I'm afraid I can't help it, depending on the editorial guidelines, Wikipedia policies and guidelines. It's not like it's just a French Wikipedia, but... In fact, such content and sources are determined by the Wikipedia itself, so verification is also carried out, so you have to choose carefully. Please refer to these below and be careful in the future.

  1. Wikipedia:AntiVandal (AV)
  2. Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1

I want you to be aware that the editing done by the parties is wrong and that it violates the two policies. --Vichycombo (talk) 15:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City of Manningham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electoral district of Ringwood. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Results of the 1908 Victorian state election (Legislative Assembly), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––– GMH MELBOURNE 06:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:51, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Results of the 1903 Australian federal election (House of Representatives), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revenue Tariff Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, DrewPwein. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Candidates of the 1908 Victorian state election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates of the 1908 Victorian state election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Results of the 2022 Victorian state election (Legislative Assembly), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Alliance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Results of the 2024 Victorian local elections in Northern Melbourne

[edit]

Not sure why you split the Inner Melbourne page to create this? The current pages/proposed pages for regions with the Inner/Outer split seems to work? Happy to keep but not sure we really needed the split Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 06:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primarily for navigability reasons. With the addition of single-member wards in Greater Melbourne especially a singular 'Inner Melbourne' region would be particularly cumbersome to have included all on a single page. Furthermore there tends not to be a great deal of agreement on what constitutes the split between inner and outer Melbourne; e.g. even though the Shire of Mitchell is part of the Outer Melbourne council organisation, it falls in the Hume region in practically all Victorian state department classifications. There may also be issues of confusion regarding the inclusion of LGAs like Greater Dandenong being considered 'inner' Melbourne, when they would be usually considered by most as too far out from the city centre to be considered 'inner'. The pages were therefore split for this reason, but if there are any better workarounds then suggestions are welcome. Cheers DrewPwein (talk) 06:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep I think that's fair reasoning to be honest! I had originally had the Inner/Outer split because of extra wards but looking at the sheer number of wards now...your split makes sense
Are you planning to delete the sections on the Inner Melbourne page that you've moved? Just asking because a lot are embedded on their respective council pages and obviously don't want that to be lost Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm taking care to make sure the LGAs are moved without too much hassle, the inner Melbourne and other regional pages should be updated promptly. Appreciate the feedback and understanding for the changes! DrewPwein (talk) 07:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Really appreciate it! Cheers
Also just to avoid any confusion on my end, is the Inner Melbourne page staying? I'd think it'd include Melbourne CC, Yarra CC, etc but I think you know more about the locations than me Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 07:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Melbourne, Port Phillip and Yarra will be staying in Inner Melbourne as they're pretty unanimously considered inner Mebourne above all else. Cheers DrewPwein (talk) 07:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do like the split pages, however, would it not be better to fit (as best as possible) to the Electoral regions of Victoria? That would put Banyule in North Eastern. IDK, I'm so used to that system that it seems weird to me to put Banyule northern haha
Thoughts? Jy Sandford (talk) 10:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't be totally opposed to this, it would stop the existence of pages like Inner Melbourne having only three LGAs, but also what would the numbers look like for the non-Melbourne pages? Want to make sure none are too big or too small Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 10:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose then you also run into the problem of where do you place Moonee Valley City Council because it's basically in both Northern Metro and Western Metro. *sigh* Jy Sandford (talk) 10:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good point, FWIW my original logic with the regions was same as for NSW (going off the regions listed on the "LGAs of Victoria" page, the split was to avoid a huuuuuuuge Greater Melbourne page with the new wards)
I'm happy to stick with the @DrewPwein changes unless an obvious problem pops up Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 10:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe best to just list the LGAs on the top of the page instead of just "six LGAs" etc. :) Jy Sandford (talk) 10:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense to me! Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 10:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually one thing - should it be "South-Eastern" not "Southeastern" for "Results of the 2024 Victorian local elections in Southeastern Melbourne"? Based on the electoral region name which does use a hyphen Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 10:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking this, I'd go with the hyphen Jy Sandford (talk) 10:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with you there
@DrewPwein you happy to move it/to let it be moved? Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 10:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would be fine with that, easy done @Totallynotarandomalt69 @Jy Sandford DrewPwein (talk) 13:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sweet, thanks! Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 13:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]