User talk:DvcDeBlvngis
Nomination of Limonov, the Ballad of Eddie for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limonov, the Ballad of Eddie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk / contribs) 22:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:LimonovMoviePoster.png
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:LimonovMoviePoster.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ✗plicit 12:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LimonovMoviePoster.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:LimonovMoviePoster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
July 2023
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Million Dollar Extreme has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. This is non-negotiable, a neutral and uninvolved source is required. Retweets from an unconfirmed social media account (about a project with no neutral RS's itself) do not fulfill that requirement. Nate • (chatter) 16:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- What neutral and uninvolved source states that Charls is a former member? As well, by what standards is the social media account unconfirmed when it is linked on his own website? DvcDeBlvngis (talk) 16:38, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- A performer's own website is promotional and not allowed. Please read WP:RS and understand it fully. Nate • (chatter) 20:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- By what means is it promotional? According to WP:RS would fall under WP:SELFSOURCE DvcDeBlvngis (talk) 20:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Anarchism
[edit]
Hi DvcDeBlvngis,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 10:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hellloooo!!!!
[edit]Heiiiii :333 Genabab (talk) 07:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Project Islero
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Project Islero you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Project Islero
[edit]The article Project Islero you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Project Islero and Talk:Project Islero/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 07:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Project Islero
[edit]The article Project Islero you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Project Islero for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Name of ESN
[edit]Hi, In line with WP:BRD, since you made your change (when removing "the") and it was reverted (by me, with a source), please refrain from changing again, and instead start a discussion in the talk page. Maybe I'm wrong, but any further change would need to be discussed and supported. Thanks! Julius Schwarz (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Julius Schwarz! While one of the sources you linked does say "The Europe of Sovereign Nations," that does not seem to be their legal name. Here[1] we can see it says "The ESN party" only in the context of the party as an entity, and here[2] it says the legal name is "Europe of Sovereign Nations", and here[3] you can see it simply says "ESN Party." Nothing about this says that the name of the group is "The Europe of Sovereign Nations." The official EU application page lists them as simply "Europe of Sovereign Nations."[4] DvcDeBlvngis (talk) 15:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I follow your arguments. Obviously, the legal name does not include the "the" and, when the name is filled into a form, the article is not included -- but that goes for all European parties, as you can see in the last link you shared. However, in English, when using the full name in a sentence, they almost all use an article. The question is perhaps more pertinent for acronyms and, there, it more of an ad hoc situation: it's "the EPP", but it's "ALDE"; it's the "PES", but it's (was) "ID". Julius Schwarz (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Because on those pages, the article is included when referring to the party in specific. For example, ID starts with "The Identity and Democracy Party" because it is specifically the Party. If it was simply "Identity and Democracy" then you would not call it "The Identity and Democracy." Currently, the ESN page reads, "The Europe of Sovereign Nations," which is incorrect grammatically because one would only include the article when specifying the party. That is why you have "the EPP" and "the PES", because those groups have Party in their name. "The European People's Party" and "The Party of European Socialists." The abbreviation of ESN does not include the word Party, ergo, it would simply be "ESN", and thus, unless the lede reads "The Europe of Sovereign Nations Party" there would be no purpose in including the article, ergo, it would simply be "Europe of Sovereign Nations". DvcDeBlvngis (talk) 21:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I remain highly unconvinced and you have yet to provide supporting sources. Short of this, and to get out of this deadlock, please discuss this on the talk page of the article. Julius Schwarz (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Because on those pages, the article is included when referring to the party in specific. For example, ID starts with "The Identity and Democracy Party" because it is specifically the Party. If it was simply "Identity and Democracy" then you would not call it "The Identity and Democracy." Currently, the ESN page reads, "The Europe of Sovereign Nations," which is incorrect grammatically because one would only include the article when specifying the party. That is why you have "the EPP" and "the PES", because those groups have Party in their name. "The European People's Party" and "The Party of European Socialists." The abbreviation of ESN does not include the word Party, ergo, it would simply be "ESN", and thus, unless the lede reads "The Europe of Sovereign Nations Party" there would be no purpose in including the article, ergo, it would simply be "Europe of Sovereign Nations". DvcDeBlvngis (talk) 21:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I follow your arguments. Obviously, the legal name does not include the "the" and, when the name is filled into a form, the article is not included -- but that goes for all European parties, as you can see in the last link you shared. However, in English, when using the full name in a sentence, they almost all use an article. The question is perhaps more pertinent for acronyms and, there, it more of an ad hoc situation: it's "the EPP", but it's "ALDE"; it's the "PES", but it's (was) "ID". Julius Schwarz (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Patriots for Europe New Logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Patriots for Europe New Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
