User talk:FarhanNaufal19

Welcome!

Hello, FarhanNaufal19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of Universal Pictures films (2020–2029) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 10mmsocket (talk) 15:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at List of Universal Pictures films (2020–2029), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of television programs based on Hasbro properties, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in The Lego Movie 2 Videogame. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:NOPIPE Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Back to the Future Part III, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 17:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Ben Whitehead. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Back to the Future (franchise), you may be blocked from editing. Going right back to making the same kinds of edits, without explanation, that led to your earlier block won't do you any favors. DonIago (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful editing

@FarhanNaufal19, you have a history of continuing to ignore warnings about vandalism and non-constructive edits, but I'm not going to try and start an edit war. You've been unblocked very recently and the first thing you've done is go straight back to deleting content. This is a warning: stop or I will alert an admin to your activities. Sirocco745 (talk) 23:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]