User talk:Fefu2011

March 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Institute of Dramatic Art has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Institute of Dramatic Art was changed by Fefu2011 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893673 on 2015-03-30T05:40:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Remember that when adding medical content please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NIDa Antigone 2014.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NIDa Antigone 2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NIDA Kandahar Gate 2014.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NIDA Kandahar Gate 2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NIDA production of In the Blood 2014.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NIDA production of In the Blood 2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NIDA The False Servant 2014.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NIDA The False Servant 2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fefu2011! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 09:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Bunch of nonsense references that have little to nothing to do with the subject WP:BOMBARD. The whole page is just a directory of past members and awards and not actually an encyclopedic article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:06, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni. Thanks! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help request re: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:National_Institute_of_Dramatic_Art_alumni

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have tried to submit this for publication twice, and the same user has blocked me both times - first, for lack of citation (even though almost everyone has Wikipedia pages that were linked, which verify their status as alumni), then accused me of bombarding with "Bunch of nonsense references that have little to nothing to do with the subject" when I took the time to source over 100 trustworthy sources verifying their status as alumni/award winners. I left a comment on his user talk page more than 2 weeks ago asking what I can do to resolve this and he (assuming "Sulfurboy" indicates a man) is completely ignoring my query, despite responding to plenty of other people who have commented since. I will acknowledge I am not the most experienced Wikipedia user, so I'm not sure what can be done here, but it doesn't make sense to me that one person can just arbitrarily block the publication of a page for no apparent reason.

--Fefu2011 (talk) 04:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask you if you are associated with the NIDA? Some of what you wrote is promotional language("s Australia's leading centre for education and training in the performing arts""). Os there something about the advice you have been given that you do not understand? 331dot (talk) 09:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I work for NIDA and have listed that information on my user profile. However, the promotional language is not the issue (if it is, I am happy to remove it). The reasons he has given for denying the page don't make sense (first that there are no citations when there are dozens of linked Wikipedia pages, then getting mad when I add over 100 independent verifying citations) and even though I asked, he refuses to give me any information for how to address why he is denying my page. It seems like one person can just decide he doesn't like my page and refuse to publish it - surely there is a way to overrule him, if he doesn't have a valid reason?

--Fefu2011 Fefu2011 (talk)

This request does not specify any administrative action that needs to be taken, so I am closing it. Please use the {{help}} template instead unless you require a specific use of the admin toolset. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have re-opened this because I am requesting administrator assistance regarding this issue. If there is some other way to address the problem, please let me know. As things stand, a user is blocking publication of my page for apparently no valid reason and I am seeking help so that it can be published. I am happy to make edits if needed, but his stated reasons don't make sense and he refuses to respond to my request for clarification, so I don't know what else to do.

--Fefu2011 Fefu2011 (talk)

This does not specifically require an action that only an administrator can perform. Any editor can give advice on editing. I have changed your tag to the more general help tag. 331dot (talk) 01:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have given you this advice before:

Remove references from subjects who have their own Wikipedia page linked and whose pages document their connection with NIDA.
For now, leave out any alums who do not have their own Wikipedia article.
Remove the lists of awards won by alumni.

I can't guarantee that this will get your draft past the reviewers' inspection, but it will make it fall much more closely in line with Wikipedia's standard policies regarding standalone list articles. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Hello, Fefu2011! Hope you're well. So, first: admins are simply editors who have more tools, which is why their symbol's a mop. Use the normal help template first. If the normal editors patrolling can't help, we'll escalate it to an admin for you.

To piggy back off Jmcgnh's response: Articles for Creation (AfC) has more than one reviewer, so likely, someone else will look at your resubmission. Please only resubmit after you've done what Jmcgng's suggested. I'd also take a look at some lists that have gone through a review process, Wikipedia:Featured lists#College or university alumni, faculty and related people. Some of the lists were promoted several years ago, and the criteria may have evolved since then. Of course, a list on NIDA alumni will look different than one for Dartmouth, for example, but looking at the Featured Lists will give you an idea of what sourcing and structure you're going for. Good luck! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni

Hello, Fefu2011. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni article

As reviewing administrator, I came across this just before it is scheduled for deletion. You seem to have already added all of this material to the main article for the Institute. Why are you trying in both places? If it is your intent to split the article , the way to go about it is to make the request on the talk page of the article. If nobody responds after a week or two, get in touch with me. I'm going to posttpone deletion a little to give you a chance to straighten this out. DGG ( talk ) 02:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:National Institute of Dramatic Art (NIDA) logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National Institute of Dramatic Art (NIDA) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni

Hello, Fefu2011. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]