Jump to content

User talk:Golden Sun Lord

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Golden Sun Lord, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as TDRSen (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Royal Palace Complex of Kandy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this nonsense. You cannot just add any journal to fit what you wrote. You need to gather references first, then read and write the content according to them. I will have to report you to the admins if you continue this nonsense, I am afraid. Chanaka L (talk) 09:59, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for any confusion. I want to clarify that when I add journals to my work, I ensure that they contain relevant and reliable information. I have conducted thorough research by reading many of them previously, and now I am adding the resources. If you would like more details on my sources, I would be happy to provide them. Thank you. Golden Sun Lord (talk) 10:09, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Minutes ago, you said you are struggling to find journal articles. All of a sudden, You have found three journals which are not publicly accessible. How convenient is that? Chanaka L (talk) 10:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your inquiry. I am currently facing difficulty in finding English journals that specifically discuss the Transfer of Power to Narendrasinghe and its influence. However, I have added relevant sources that I found through JSTOR.org. One of the sources describes the marriage of Dona Catherina to Vimaladharamasuriya I and Senarath. The second reference explains how their marriage helped stabilize Vimaladharamasuriya I's reign and secure his place as the ruler of Kandy. The third reference highlights Rajasinghe II's achievements as both a regent and king. If you are interested, I can provide more details on these sources. Thank you for your patience and understanding. Golden Sun Lord (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for any confusion. To clarify, I did not mean to suggest that I did not have any references. But I don't have English Journals to provide in some sections' Golden Sun Lord (talk) 10:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for bringing that up. While I understand that some sources may not be publicly accessible, I believe it's worth noting that there are still ways for independent researchers like yourself to access them. One such platform that comes to mind is JSTOR.org, which provides access to a vast array of academic resources that may not be easily available elsewhere. So, in essence, what I think I should say is that although certain sources may not be publicly accessible, you can still access them as an independent researcher through platforms like JSTOR.org. Golden Sun Lord (talk) 10:44, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you quote the text that says "how their marriage helped stabilize Vimaladharamasuriya I's reign and secure his place as the ruler of Kandy" with the page number? Chanaka L (talk) 10:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
'of Dona Catherina , Kusumasana Devi to the Kandyans, whom he forcibly married to legitimise his claim to the Kandyan throne. It is the offspring of this union that is the subject of so much controversy. One of the main issues is the number of sons he had from Dona Catherina...' from The Children of Wimaladharmasuriya 1C. Gaston Perera Golden Sun Lord (talk) 10:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
page 145, the last para also contain Golden Sun Lord (talk) 11:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to the quote given, it doesn't say any about "stabilize Vimaladharamasuriya I's reign and secure his place as the ruler of Kandy", all it says is Vimaladharamasuriya forcibly married Dona Caterina. The rest is your opinion. Chanaka L (talk) 11:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
it says, legitimize his claim to the Kandyan throne Golden Sun Lord (talk) 11:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
if this is my opinion, I'm curious as to why this information is also included in government textbooks issued by Sri Lanka and written by professors. It seems that there may be some recognition of the marriage's significance in legitimizing Vimaladharamasuriya I's the claim to the Kandyan throne and securing his position as the ruler of Kandy. Golden Sun Lord (talk) 11:38, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's important to note that Vimaladharamasuriya I's forcible marriage to Dona Caterina was likely not done for personal reasons, but rather as a strategic move to legitimize his claim to the Kandyan throne and establish himself as the rightful ruler. Golden Sun Lord (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Legitimizing and "stabilizing and securing" are two things. It leaves doubt for an argument. It is not a suitable tone for an encyclopedic article. Just state what the reference state. This is why you should gather your references first, read them and then only compose your text. Chanaka L (talk) 11:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
School textbooks are not considered WP:RS, plain and simple. Chanaka L (talk) 11:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"I just wanted to clarify that the statement I added was not my personal opinion Golden Sun Lord (talk) 11:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's worth noting that government-issued textbooks undergo a rigorous review process overseen by boards of professors. While the information presented may be simplified for the target audience, it is not necessarily wholly wrong. Golden Sun Lord (talk) 12:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's one of the reasons why I didn't include government-issued textbooks as a primary source Golden Sun Lord (talk) 12:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your concern about the tone and accuracy of the text. Upon further reflection, I agree that it's important to consider the context in which the book talks about Vimaladharamasuriya I and his offspring. If he had not taken steps to stabilize and secure his position as the ruler of Kandy, it is unlikely that there would be any need to discuss why his royal offspring did not survive to claim the throne. Therefore, it's reasonable to assume that his marriage to Dona Caterina played a role in solidifying his claim to the Kandyan throne and helping to establish his dynasty. I will be sure to take this into account when gathering and citing my references in the future." Golden Sun Lord (talk) 11:54, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that the overall tone and content of the journal supports the idea that Vimaladharamasuriya I took steps to stabilize and secure his position as the ruler of Kandy. Based on the information presented in the journal, it is reasonable to interpret his marriage to Dona Caterina as one such step in this direction." Golden Sun Lord (talk) 11:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is not a reasonable assumption, It is clear original research, editorialising, and introducing POV. You could have simply written, "The marriage to Donna Caterina helped to legitimise the Vimaladharmasuriya I's claim to the throne." Chanaka L (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your guidance as a senior editor. I appreciate your feedback, and I will take your suggestions into account as I revise the text. Golden Sun Lord (talk) 12:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]