Jump to content

User talk:Iamghqlick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RG Qluck Wise moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, RG Qluck Wise, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SANTADICAE🎅 18:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RG Qluck Wise (February 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wgullyn were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Wgullyn // talk // contribs 01:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Iamghqlick! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wgullyn // talk // contribs 01:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RG Qluck Wise (March 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 04:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RG Qluck Wise moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, RG Qluck Wise, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 01:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RG Qluck Wise for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RG Qluck Wise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RG Qluck Wise until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CUPIDICAE💕 18:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Writing about yourself

[edit]

I am only going to give you one warning about this, but stop writing about yourself and promoting yourself on Wikipedia. CUPIDICAE💕 18:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Know this is not accepted on Wikipedia so how can I do that bro/sis? Iamghqlick (talk) 12:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RG Qluck Wise (April 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for unblock

[edit]

{{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 41.215.163.143.

Your draft article, Draft:RG Qluck Wise

[edit]

Hello, Iamghqlick. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RG Qluck Wise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 06:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamghqlick (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

We cannot consider a blank request; but I see no block on this account. If you are unable to edit, please follow the instructions that appear when you attempt it. 331dot (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Requesting for unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamghqlick (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

still unable to edit dit Iamghqlick (talk) 04:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no block on your account directly. Please follow the instructions that appear when you attempt to make an edit; it will help to know what those instructions are. 331dot (talk) 09:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Iamghqlick, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Gudwise (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamghqlick. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 22:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]