User talk:Jeomiller

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tanvir Shahriar Rimon (April 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Repeatedly recreated by sock farm.

This was draftified with info on issues that had to be addressed, but immediately resubmitted without any attempt at cleaning up the mess.

bonadea contributions talk 15:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeomiller! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 15:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tanvir Shahriar Rimon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanvir Shahriar Rimon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanvir Shahriar Rimon (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eagleash (talk) 08:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Dominicvai per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dominicvai. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]