Jump to content

User talk:Keith T. E. Bhumivarn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

online training

[edit]

Please complete online student training at https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/students You must login and complete all five basic modules. (Wikipedia policies, ..., Finding your article) After completion of these module, we will be able to see that you have edited at least three pages on the English Wikipedia.

Special:Contributions/Keith T. E. Bhumivarn at this time shows that you have not finished:

  • sandbox [1] (N.B. Please do not click "Submit your draft for review!". The function is not applicable to our course.)
  • be bold [2]
  • talk page tutorial [3]

You need to be logged in on a desktop platform, so that your contributions are recorded under your account. The links above take you straight into the pages where you can launch interactive tutorials. We expect to see you create three new pages during the this training exercise. --Taweetham (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that you have not complete the assignment. Please complete it as soon as possible to remain in our program. --Taweetham (talk) 11:52, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is a reminder that you have not complete the assignment. Please complete it as soon as possible to remain in our program. --Taweetham (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Topic proposal

[edit]

Please propose a topic or two that you wish to write on Wikipedia. You should read all related articles/policies on Wikipedia and provide the following information.

  1. Your proposed article(s) (New or existing STUB article relating to a chemical compound, reaction, equipment or technique - or related to your major/interest. (see Category:Stub-Class Chemistry articles))
    • For new article, explain briefly why it passes WP:NOTE.
    • For existing topics, explain briefly the state/structure of the current article.
      • Is the structure & existing content appropriate?
        • If not, restructure or remove content as per WP:MOS and WP:NOT before you move to the next stage.
  2. Brief outline of your contributions to the article
    • In what section & what content
      • Make sure it belongs to the article and it is encyclopedic. See WP:NOT for things that should NOT be added.
      • Make sure that it is not redundant to existing articles. Use Google search "site:wikipedia.org" rather than Wikipedia search.
    • References for the article
    • Media files (photo/VDO/drawing) to be used in the article.
      • You may suggest plan to create your own work and upload to Wikimedia Commons
      • You may use existing media on Wikimedia Commons. Use Google image search "site:wikimedia.org" rather than Wikimedia Commons search.
  3. Examples/template/related articles that you will use as a model to develop your nominated article.
    • In terms of WP:MOS/formatting - your article will have similar style/format/tone to these articles.
    • In terms of content - your article will link to or will be linked from these articles.

Please leave your answer below. (Leave a reply in this section of your talkpage.) --Taweetham (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that you have not complete the assignment. Please complete it as soon as possible to remain in our program. --Taweetham (talk) 05:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please check if your proposal is similar to contents in Tollens' reagent. --Taweetham (talk) 10:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You will move the content from the article out to create a new article, Silver mirror. --Taweetham (talk) 04:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First draft

[edit]

Your topic is approved and added to the course page. Please develop the proposal into the first draft in your sandbox.

  • For existing article, you may copy some parts of the existing article to your sandbox to see how revision/integration of content would work. You will copy the code back to the article at later stage.
  • For new article, you may want to copy parts of a template article to your sandbox to see what sections are necessary. The sandbox will be moved to the article namespace at later stage. Please do not click "Submit your draft for review!". The function is not applicable to our course.

In all cases, do not copy more than what is necessary. For example, do not copy any categories to your sandbox. --Taweetham (talk) 20:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The procedural part of your sandbox is not encyclopedia. Read more at WP:NOT. You will need to work hard on the sandbox to make it become a new article.

First edit on the article namespace

[edit]

Your work has been reviewed. Majority of the content/formatting is ok. Please carefully move encyclopedic part of your sandbox to article namespace so that the general public can see it. Here are some tips to help you complete the transition to online editing.

  1. Content/Formatting policies
  2. Technicalities
    • Unlike sandbox, all edits will be public immediately and it is important to make sure that all of your edits are acceptable. You may use preview button and provide edit summary to help you.
    • Any "page save" on Wikipedia even outside article namespace is permanently recorded and can be retrieved by the public. Please think carefully before you click save and before you revert other people edits. No work is lost but only the latest version of the page is shown to the public. Deletion of pages (or versions of pages) is only possible by admins if it falls under Wikipedia:Deletion policy. You can request admins to do deletion or other prescribed tasks should the need arises.
    • You may want to set watchlist and notifications so that you can catch up with changes made to your article and your talk page by other editors.
  3. Community interactions
    • You will be interacting with other volunteers when you make edits on the article namespace. Please respect other users in the community and assume good faith.
    • If your work is reverted or modified in any other ways, do not engage in a edit war. Rather use discussion page of your article to settle issues.
    • You may be blocked from Wikipedia for failure to observe community rules.

We hope you enjoy seeing product of your hard work read by many people in the years to come. --Taweetham (talk) 00:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your work is not properly formatted and not encyclopedia. Read WP:NOT and remove unnecessary content then read WP:MOS and format the article asap. It cannot survive on the article namespace for long time. --Taweetham (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your work is currently on this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silver_mirror_(chemical_reaction)&action=history --Taweetham (talk) 04:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia Education Program. Your assignment is not completed by the deadline and we have to move on with a smaller group of students. Your voluntary work on Wikipedia are still welcome but will not be graded. --Taweetham (talk) 01:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 08:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, Keith T. E. Bhumivarn! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 08:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]