User talk:Keivan.f

This is Keivan.f's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: 31 days

Welcome to Keivan.f's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. I will try to WP:PING you as well. Conversely if you are replying to something I've said on another talk page, reply there and include {{ping|Keivan.f}} to alert me.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

It is 10:42 AM where this user lives. ^(Purge)

Image

https://www.ipernity.com/doc/buildings/44754350

Above is the website which may have been where I got the Potternewton Image that you enquired about. Thanks Srbernadette (talk) 11:04, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Srbernadette: Thanks for the clarification. Well, on the website it clearly states "all rights reserved" so I presume it cannot be included in the article. Keivan.f^Talk 05:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon infobox

Hello there! I again tried to add essential information to Napoleon’s infobox that has been removed and I was again reverted. You mentioned opening an Rfc to discuss the infobox overall. I have never personally opened an Rfc and would prefer another more experienced editor in opening Rfc’s to do so. I don’t know your experience with opening Rfc’s but if you’ve done so before I’d like to ask if you’d be willing to open one. Kind regards, Robertus Pius (Talk • Contribs) 21:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arms

@Keivan.f Considering the fact that you are working on Catherine's article alongside me, it is only fair that I write to you regarding some recent developments. I suggest you take a look at the revisions made to Catherine's article as well as to the one concerning her titles and honours since yesterday. Hence, looking forward to knowing your opinion on the "Arms" section. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 09:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user who attempted to remove the information has been reverted so there's not much left to look into. Keivan.f^Talk 04:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will Catherine's FAC come about in 2025 or is there still any possibility of it happening this year? Unfortunately, we could not make it happen this summer. Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 07:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot think of an exact time frame since I'm buried underneath exams and school work. I'll make some changes and additions once I find some time. Keivan.f^Talk 04:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

@Keivan.f The lead for Catherine's article can be definitely improved and it's significant that we expand it and try to summarise it in the best possible manner. Looking forward to your response. It would be greatly appreciated to know your opinion. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 09:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is concerning the recent comment on the article's talk page I must say that I side with the user who opposed the inclusion of any info about the photoshop fiasco. The whole thing was a storm in a tea cup. A sentence can be added on her health issues which I attempted to do in the past but it was reverted so I'm not gonna bother right now. You can work on the lede first on your sandbox and then ask for opinions on the talk page (or from peers) and then hopefully implement some changes. Keivan.f^Talk 04:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f The incident occurred after she had begun chemotherapy treatment for cancer, which she announced on 22 March after the image alteration was uncovered. Or

The incident occurred after she had begun chemotherapy treatment for cancer, which she announced on 22 March. Which one do you prefer? The latter version as it stands, avoids repetition of a fact which is already mentioned at the beginning of the sentence.

I have consulted multiple sources to check which option is correct and the latter one has been preferred, each time. Yet I would like to know your opinion on the same as it would help in resolving any future discussions pertaining to the above sentence. Looking forward to your response. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 08:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]