User talk:Kyanwan

Welcome!

Hello, Kyanwan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 09:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WAZZA! Talk about me :D

Kyanwan 22:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al Hannah Islamic Clothing (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EoRdE6 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Al Hannah Islamic Clothing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 20:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kyanwan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 20:22, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Al Hannah Islamic Clothing

Hello, Kyanwan. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Al Hannah Islamic Clothing".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Al Hannah Islamic Clothing}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aug 24

I sugest you read wp:soap and wp:or. Slatersteven (talk) 15:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LBGT

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Slatersteven (talk) 12:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the duplicate(-ish) notice below, but we require the use of a different template when someone is first being warned about the contentious topics situation. Slatersteven, this is something to be cautious about in the future. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck this site. So biased and bullshit. This proves my point. There is an agenda here. If anyone shares information that does not align with an agenda, it's silenced and censored. Kyanwan (talk) 20:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for wrongthink. Fuck off. Kyanwan (talk) 20:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everybody has been pretty patient with your comments tbh. I think you are just making inferences without actual evidence/sources. Wiki isn't a space for hashing your own hypothesis out. Zenomonoz (talk) 09:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Monitoring my personal talk page? Out of the universe of editors I must be in the bottom 1%. Wow.3 people watching me?

"Being patient with my comments"

All I did was speak up against censorship. That should be agreeable. I believe I have all the proof I need to know that this is a pathetic and unreliable source for research.

This is clearly a highly organized disinformation campaign - the response. Wow.

My guy. I have a poatgraduate degree and am working on a second. I know how to do research. I know how to read scientific papers since it's my field. There is solid peer reviewed research out there that says: what you believe is wrong.

You choose to censor and intimidate because your feelings are more important than scientific truth. You are a threat to civilized society. Tell me what I need to do for a permaban so I'm not tempted to come back to this cesspool. I prefer to not associate with actual genuine textbook fascists. Kyanwan (talk) 11:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is "watching you". User talk pages are the appropriate place to discuss user behavior.

You linked to articles about BPA, which were completely unrelated to sexual orientation and gender identity. If you linked to reliable source articles explicitly discussing endocrine disruptors and LGBT we would be open ears. Instead you just ranted about how "biased" Wikipedia is.

The last paragraph of the article already does discuss theoretical pathways through which endocrine disruptors may interfere with sex differentiation in utero, which you seem to have missed. Zenomonoz (talk) 00:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3 deranged weirdos appear on my page + I get notices about it & warnings for saying "I'm dismayed by censorship."

That's the definition of watching.

Keep censoring. Keep doing your thing. If your ideas were right you wouldn't need to censor. Kyanwan (talk) 01:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is solid peer reviewed research out there that says: what you believe is wrong – well you haven't provided any. Zenomonoz (talk) 22:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]