User talk:Liztrudon

This is Liztrudon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Arnav Kapur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Arnav Kapur. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any questions about the draft, please ask them on a talk page so that they can be seen by the community. The draft talk page is best, but either your user talk page (here) or my user talk page is all right. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment, Robert! Understood - I'll continue the conversation here.

What are the next action items on my part re this draft, do I have to make improvements before this goes live? Liztrudon (talk) 05:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arnav Kapur (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources authored by the subject do not count toward establishing notability. Please rework the article with reliable sources, at least three. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 07:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you so much @Spinster300 for taking the time out to review this! I shall rework the references according to the guidelines and resubmit. Thank you for your feedback - this helps me become a better editor. :-) Liztrudon (talk) 14:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arnav Kapur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 07:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Liztrudon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 07:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Arnav Kapur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Arnav Kapur. Thanks! Kline • talk to me! • contribs 04:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Kline for the feedback! This is helpful.

I was trying to follow the guidelines verbatim as best as I understood them. I added references that were secondary, independent with no primary influence from the subject, that talked about the relevant detail in the article and were from reliable sources that showed broad coverage (that is why the added number of links - not to unnecessarily populate). I'd appreciate any help as to how I can improve the article? Should I remove some references? Liztrudon (talk) 04:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arnav Kapur has been accepted

Arnav Kapur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @WikiOriginal-9 for reviewing and accepting! This has been a great learning process. I love how collaborative Wikipedia is. :) Liztrudon (talk) 04:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]