User talk:Lynda MALOCHET
Lynda MALOCHET, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Lynda MALOCHET! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ascenz (April 6)
[edit]
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, Lynda MALOCHET. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page User:Lynda MALOCHET/sandbox/Ascenz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 09:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Disclose your employment
[edit]Hello Lynda MALOCHET. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lynda MALOCHET. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lynda MALOCHET|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Ian.thomson (talk) 12:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
@Ian.thomson: Hi Ian Thomson i am working for GTT (Communication), we want for Ascenz a wikipedia page like their competitors. We don't want advertising, just information about who they are and what they do. Where should i insert this ?
.svg) | Lynda MALOCHET, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by GTT (Gaztransport&Technigaz) for their contributions to Wikipedia. |
Thank you for your help. Regards, Lynda MALOCHET (talk) 13:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- You seem to misunderstand what Wikipedia is. We are a volunteer-driven summary of professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources.
- Articles are not written by their subjects. For example, The Coca-Cola Company did not write our articles on them or Coca-Cola.
- The fundamental phrasing and even the approach of your attempted article is promotional. Phrases like "solutions" are not neutral unless you're talking about chemistry; state facts so plainly that even your competitors would have to agree with those statements. Just wanting to spread information about the company is also promotional; just summarize independent sources.
- You can find instructions on how to write articles that won't be rejected here. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
AfC notification: User:Lynda MALOCHET/sandbox/Ascenz has a new comment
[edit]
@Theroadislong: Thank you Theroadislong, i have made the requested changes i hope it will be fine. Lynda MALOCHET (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Lynda MALOCHET/sandbox/Ascenz
[edit]
Hello, Lynda MALOCHET. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Ascenz".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)