Jump to content

User talk:M.Shaseeb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheBritinator (talk) 12:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, M.Shaseeb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBritinator (talk) 12:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Law Reform Commission of Mauritius has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/1762705/Domingue.pdf and https://docplayer.net/190051461-Law-reform-commission.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — Diannaa (talk) 13:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Diannaa,
I understand the copyright policy of Wikipedia. You may wish to note that I am writing this article at the request of the Law Reform Commission of Mauritius and the links that you have provided which appeared to be a direct copy are also the works of the Commission itself. Grateful if you can help me with the publication of this article as I have a tight deadline to meet.
Thanks and kind regards,
Shaseeb Mungur
Law Reform Officer/Senior Law Reform Officer
Law Reform Commission M.Shaseeb (talk) 18:13, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the copyright holder wishes to release this material under a compatible license, please see WP:Requesting copyright permission for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. — Diannaa (talk) 23:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, M.Shaseeb. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:16, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheBritinator (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{Permission pending}} M.Shaseeb (talk) 07:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft can be restored if and when the permission email is received and is found to meet our requirements. Please be patient; this could take a while. — Diannaa (talk) 23:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Grateful if you could speed up with the process. I need the article to be published as fast as possible. At the start, I have already pointed out my concerns and tight deadline.
Thank you. M.Shaseeb (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Despite the previous notice and conversation about providing permission first, you put the same copyrighted material in a new draft. That is not acceptable, and I have deleted the draft. If you do this again without waiting for permission to be verified, you will be blocked from editing. -- Whpq (talk) 21:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When will I obtain the permission?It has been one week since I have sought permission. It seems that there is not a proper coordination among your team since I have already disclosed that I am paid to edit but one of your team told me that I have not done so. Can you please be clearer with your advice!It is really annoying and unprofessional on your part. M.Shaseeb (talk) 06:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Law Reform Commission of Mauritius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/1762705/Domingue.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Broc (talk) 17:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

On Wikipedia, sources are very important. What are the 3-5 best sources you know, that are at the same time reliably published (WP:RS), independent of the Law Reform Commission, and about the Law Reform Commission in some detail? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 05:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Toadette (Let's discuss together!) 09:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, M.Shaseeb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:M.Shaseeb/Law Reform Commission of Mauritius, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]