Jump to content

User talk:Mb 9702

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Mb 9702, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Mb 9702, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]

Hi Mb 9702, I noticed you asking different users for the permission to edit a particular page. I am providing you with some links which will help you understand more about wikipedia. Please feel free to contact me by pinging me here or leaving a text on my talk page.

But while working on wikipedia please remember five pillars of wikipedia. And if you find these to be violated be bold to edit and correct those. And also remember that wikipedia is not a reliable source. I hope this will help you. -ink&fables «talk» 19:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Love Jihad, you may be blocked from editing. SUN EYE 1 10:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alert

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 08:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making unspecified edit requests

[edit]

What you need to do is specify what you what changed AND show what sources meeting WP:RS back your changes. Please also read WP:VERIFY - and don't ask again until you've read those as otherwise you'll probably just be told your sources don't meet our criteria. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article has some wrong information and misquotes like, "Islamophobic theory" and that it Love Jihad means Islamophobia that is very wrong and a misquote. I want these lines to be changed. Mb 9702 (talk) 14:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have just posted the same assertion/request to Talk:Love Jihad for the ninth time. Please specify alternative content and reliable sources that can support it, as I and other editors have asked. Otherwise, please stop. This is not constructive, and it will not bring any changes to the article. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by islamophobic? We as Hindus feel threatened by muslims in our own country India we have to live like prisoners without any aspiration and clarity of thought and expression. Mb 9702 (talk) 16:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe you can't see the irony in your statement right there. NarSakSasLee (talk) 18:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mb 9702, since original research is not permitted in Wikipedia articles, please review the verifiability policy and the reliable sources guideline for more information on the types of sources that Wikipedia requires. — Newslinger talk 19:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's the truth that I am saying. Stop being not making any sense and being a hypocrite. Mb 9702 (talk) 05:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Mb 9702. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 11:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the article published is completely wrong and not based on facts then editing is the only solution. I think its based on Islamic viewpoints entirely ignoring the other view. Mb 9702 (talk) 11:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The lead section of the Love Jihad article is based on high-quality academic sources. If you have located academic sources that provide additional information on the Love Jihad conspiracy theory, feel free to share them. — Newslinger talk 11:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you guys can threaten me all the time. I've already sent a request to the Arbitration Commitee regarding your monopoly routine. Now please take care of yourself! Mb 9702 (talk) 18:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mb9702. I noticed your post at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee was removed by an arbitrator for being in the wrong place. The best place to respond and defend yourself is at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. You should post your comment below the header "Statement by Mb 9702" which is already there. Hope this helps. Bishonen | tålk 20:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
I'm not sure if reasoning with you is possible, but I would like to note that the article should reflect what reliable sources say. That mixed relationships exist is not in question. The issue is also not a WP gang. You should click on the citation blue links and read what those sources say. To assess the reliability of a source, WP:RSN and its archives can be consulted. WP:RS, WP:V and WP:NPOV are core Wikipedia policies. —PaleoNeonate08:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PaleoNeonate: He is now causing significant disruption at WP:ANI. See this and this. NarSakSasLee (talk) 13:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very derogatory against ones religious sentiments and creed

[edit]

SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!




Mb 9702 (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Love Jihad

[edit]

Please note that this page is publishing derogatory comments against ones religious sentiments and ones creed. Please listen to this earnest appeal and try to initiate the respective changes. Mb 9702 (talk) 08:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mb 9702: You are now reported in WP:AIV your distruptive behaviour. 36.76.234.82 (talk) 09:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,718 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Popular Front of India (talk) Add sources
524 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Shirk (Islam) (talk) Add sources
4,343 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Sanskrit (talk) Add sources
256 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Freedom of religion in India (talk) Add sources
164 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Social stigma of obesity (talk) Add sources
2,047 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Terrorism (talk) Add sources
305 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Anti-Korean sentiment (talk) Cleanup
285 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Saffron terror (talk) Cleanup
78 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Leprosy stigma (talk) Cleanup
262 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Human rights in Pakistan (talk) Expand
154 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Anti-Vietnamese sentiment (talk) Expand
3,759 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Amit Shah (talk) Expand
80 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Anti-Croat sentiment (talk) Unencyclopaedic
33 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Anti-Khmer sentiment (talk) Unencyclopaedic
55 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Anti-Mongolianism (talk) Unencyclopaedic
110 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Ghar Wapsi (talk) Merge
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Agra religious conversions 2014 (talk) Merge
351 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Social model of disability (talk) Merge
370 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Power distance (talk) Wikify
61 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Bodu Bala Sena (talk) Wikify
1,874 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Redlining (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Atef Yassien El Sherif (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Aliwal Jattan (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Boundary estimation in EIT (talk) Orphan
188 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Semantic Scholar (talk) Stub
54 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Usha Thakur (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Jhabua nuns rape case (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Ladakh Buddhist Association (talk) Stub
32 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Clannism (talk) Stub
35 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Anti-Austrian sentiment (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a disruption-only account and wasting the time of more and more users.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 13:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]