Jump to content

User talk:Metikatic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Metikatic, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will we ever be unblocked or what exactly do we have to do for that? Metikatic (talk) 00:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]

Hello, I'm ThatIPEditor. I noticed that in this edit to Coral bleaching, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 18:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Coral bleaching, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk - contribs) 18:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Coral bleaching, you may be blocked from editing. Kirbanzo (talk - contribs) 18:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Coral bleaching. Kirbanzo (talk - contribs) 19:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Coral bleaching. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Metikatic (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

we are all new to using wiki for our class assignment and we have an assignment due and we need it to be unblocked and restore our sandbox. Thank you for understanding from now on we will follow the guidelines after this mistake Metikatic (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

 You were given more than enough warnings that your editing was unacceptable, uncluding twice being warned that continuing to act in the same way would lead to being blocked from editing. You chose to ignore those warnings. Your unblock request makes no attempt to address the reasons for the block. You use the word "mistake", but you knew what you were doing. Moreover, the one place where you have tried to describe the reason for the block, namely the paragraph beginning "All this mishap..." , far from showing that you understand the reasons for the block and will not do the same again, unequivocally shows that you don't understand the reason. All that is not going to be set aside in order to help you achieve an aim of your own, unrelated to benefitting the encyclopaedia. I suggest you re-read the guide to appealling blocks (assuming you did read it before posting an unblock request). JBW (talk) 07:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You use the words "we", "our", and "us". Does that mean this account is shared by more than one person? JBW (talk) 07:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I meant we because we are working in group and that person has also been denied access to the sandbox draft. We were also told by our instructor to add the changes we made to our draft and add it to the talk page. We have gone through our material to edit out an anything that is not appropriate and anything that might have copyright infringements. We have condensed the Potential Solution: Artificial upwelling (AU) text, taken out anything that was unnecessary from the images we used which is found in the context section and the infectious disease section paragraph, as well. Metikatic (talk) 13:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JBW looks like they're working on this together with Starfruit101. I believe that's the "we". Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. Thanks, @Ian (Wiki Ed):. @Cotne002: are you there? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have gone through our material to edit out an anything that is not appropriate and anything that might have copyright infringements.Metikatic (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]