User talk:Microphylla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Microphylla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet. What is your evidence? Who is the master? Microphylla (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Just saying you're not a sockpuppet will not get you unblocked; if we unblocked just on that basis we might as well not block anyone for sockpuppetry. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:31, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What should I do to convince you that I am not a sock puppet then? Which user's edits are similar to mine? I want to show you that your evidence is not enough. You can not call me sock puppet without opening an investigation. Microphylla (talk) 13:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Microphylla (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I get no answer so I must make a new attempt. It is difficult to prove I am not a sock puppet if you do not tell me who you suspect is the master. Can you at least open an investigation? Microphylla (talk) 20:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not substantially different from the above request. If you are not a sockpuppet, who the master is isn't relevant. If you are, you don't need us to tell you who you are. 331dot (talk) 12:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not. What should I do to prove it? Who is the master can be relevant because we can compare his/her edits to mine. Microphylla (talk) 12:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:SOCKBLOCK for information on what you can do. 331dot (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have read there what I can do if I am a sock puppet and want a second chance but I am not a sock puppet and want to prove it. What should I do then? Microphylla (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As SOCKBLOCK states, "If you appeal a sockpuppetry block, you should also disclose all relevant information that might be relevant or might help explain why the community suspects sockpuppetry. Examples of circumstances that you should disclose include if you were encouraged to edit a Wikipedia page on social media or by a friend, if you share an internet connection with others whom you know edit Wikipedia, or if you were paid to edit Wikipedia. As an editor on a collaborative, community-based project, you have an obligation to avoid deceiving the community or its administrative processes, and failing to divulge relevant information may be considered an attempt to intentionally deceive the community." If that does not help you, your final option is to contact the Arbitration Committee via email at arbcom-enwikimedia.org. 331dot (talk) 16:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kung Hibbe per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kung Hibbe. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]