User talk:Mr. Bridie Towne

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Hamish Ross (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello, Mr. Bridie Towne, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 09:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Greenaway

Hello! You recently reverted my edit of Peter Greenaway, apparently by automation, on the grounds that it was "not constructive". I disagree with this assertion most strongly. Describing the Blitz as "Nazi bombing of London" is unnecessarily verbose and dramatic in my opinion. Calling it by its proper name, and what the page it links to is actually titled as ("the Blitz"), is more in line with Wikipedia stylistic recommendations. I therefore believe that my edit improves the article, so by definition it is a constructive edit. Clearly you disagree, but I don't believe you are justified in reverting my edit on the grounds you claim, so I request that you refrain from reverting again when I restore my edit. If in fact I am speaking to a bot, I request that the owner makes any necessary adjustments to stop the bot from reverting my edit again. Thanks!

2A02:C7C:8673:3C00:58BF:ABC0:F606:ED91 (talk) 10:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss it on the article talk page please. Mr. Bridie Towne (talk) 10:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect Mr Birdie, why should I? From looking at your contributions page, a clear pattern emerges, one which seems to be at odds with Wikipedia's policy of open editing. It's clear to me that your bot is specifically targetting edits made by unregistered users arbitrarily, which is frankly disturbing. The gall to call these edits "not constructive", when it is in fact YOU who is being DESTRUCTIVE, I find rather ironic! I will not be taking this to the talk page, I will instead this afternoon restore my original edit. If I find that you have reverted it again, I will be reporting you to admin, with the hope that your odd little experiment will swiftly be banned. 2A02:C7C:8673:3C00:58BF:ABC0:F606:ED91 (talk) 11:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that 👍 Mr. Bridie Towne (talk) 11:21, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're clearly a troll, let's see if your account lasts another day. Good luck! 2A02:C7C:8673:3C00:58BF:ABC0:F606:ED91 (talk) 11:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Someone's clearly projecting because they got called out for their garbage edits. Seems the warning I gave you was entirely justified. Lmao! Mr. Bridie Towne (talk) 11:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-constructive edits

You should stop reverting my edits on various South Park related articles. The character which is now called "Tolkien Black" used to be called "Token Black" before Season 25 episode 2 "The Big Fix". In that episode the name is changed along with the joke that it actually always was "Tolkien". While this is a funny joke, it does not reflect the actual reality of what the character was called in previous episodes. So stop reverting my edits, the joke was funny but vandalizing Wikipedia for it isn't. 2001:9E8:89A9:F700:7475:237D:9D0A:9834 (talk) 10:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss it on the article(s) talk page(s) please. Mr. Bridie Towne (talk) 10:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would have thought that the explanation I wrote describing the edit would be more than sufficient. If you really believe that the character should be referred to as "Tolkien" in these older episodes, then I suggest you discuss it on the articles talk pages 2001:9E8:89A9:F700:7475:237D:9D0A:9834 (talk) 10:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Earl Abel's

Hi Mr. Bridie Towne stop undoing L'Osier and other edits I am working on Category:Wikipedia articles with an infobox request - 86.16.95.200 (talk) 12:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure the edits you are making are constructive and well sourced, otherwise they're likely to be reverted again. Cheers, Mr. Bridie Towne (talk) 11:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to continue on editing and removing your warnings maybe you should read Wikipedia:Assume good faith before revering thanks- 86.16.95.200 (talk) 12:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are entitled to do that, noone is asking you to stop editing or is threatening to block you at this time. Like I say though, please just be mindful about making constructive edits. Mr. Bridie Towne (talk) 11:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also you undid edits when I moved the image to the infobox for example Wellington Monument, London how is that non-constructive thanks- 86.16.95.200 (talk) 12:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have consensus for that? Also, please use : for proper indentation in your comments. Mr. Bridie Towne (talk) 11:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie

What did i do wrong? I just added people with this name and put everything in alphabetical order. 46.34.192.81 (talk) 11:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I'll take another look. Mr. Bridie Towne (talk) 11:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —Ingenuity (t • c) 12:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]