User talk:Muradmomi12

August 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Quetta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks dear I am New but I provided information of cast lives in Quetta City Muradmomi12 (talk) 20:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Havelian appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:17, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Havelian, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:17, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of people with surname Qureshi, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 20:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Muradmomi12 (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Muradmomi12/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muradmomi12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The newspaper's website is not an independent source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Muradmomi12/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Uzair Sher Khan

Hello Muradmomi12, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Uzair Sher Khan, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzair Sher Khan.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Uzair Sher Khan. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok dear please Guide me Muradmomi12 (talk) 11:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Melloway Media & Marketing Private Limited moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Melloway Media & Marketing Private Limited. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 14:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sultanpur, Havelian moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sultanpur, Havelian. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~ Tails Wx 19:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sardar Shuja Nabi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sardar Shuja Nabi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atif Munsif Khan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Atif Munsif Khan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear I provde all soureces that Wikipedia required Muradmomi12 (talk) 17:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Awaz Times moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Daily Awaz Times. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atif Munsif Khan (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet the minimum inline citation requirements per WP:BLP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atif Munsif Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shahzaib Rind

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shahzaib Rind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tribune.com.pk/story/2464245/winning-with-character-shahzaib-rinds-journey. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ⸺(Random)staplers 20:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Muradmomi12! Your additions to Shahzaib Rind have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks dear I am new thanks for Guideing me Muradmomi12 (talk) 06:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Alam moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Emma Alam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note - per WP:DRAFTOBJECT, you can move this back to article space, but what you did was move it to Wikipedia space. You are allowed to move it again if you think it should be in the main article space. Just be sure to choose "(article)" for the name space. Be aware that if you do move it, the article may be nominated for deletion. Courtesy ping to @Saqib: who draftified the article. -- Whpq (talk) 13:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emma Alam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Alam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Alam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gabriel (……?) 18:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nisar Safdar Khan Jadoon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nisar Safdar Khan Jadoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisar Safdar Khan Jadoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gabriel (……?) 00:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notice

Hi, why did you post this AfC notice on Cfaso2000's talk page? You are not an AfC reviewer and have never edited Paul Oluikpe. C F A 💬 23:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I've mentioned you at this ANI report in case you wish to comment there. C F A 💬 23:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muradmomi12, I came here to ask you the same thing. You gave Cfaso2000 that notice 10 minutes after they had themself moved the article back to mainspace from draft. Did you make a mistake and click on the "inform creator" button in the template? How did you come to be looking at Paul Oluikpe? Someone got suspicious of that article's creator when they saw your template, which is what drew my attention as well as CFA's. (Courtesy mentor notification: GoingBatty.)

I was also going to ask you something else, so I'll go ahead and ask. Two articles that you created are at Articles for Deletion right now, Nisar Safdar Khan Jadoon and Emma Alam, and Uzair Sher Khan was deleted on 8 September after being at AfD for a week. But you haven't edited any of the deletion discussions (indeed, you've never edited any page with the Wikipedia: prefix). You've been using user talk pages, but don't you realise you can explain why your articles should be kept? There's a link to the discussion in a box at the top of each of the pages, and also in the notifications you've been given on this page.

... And lastly, I'm aware that conventions are different in different places, but please don't address people as "dear". Some of us find it quite rude. Use people's user names; that's always safe. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Thekhyberboypk per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thekhyberboypk. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 23:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]