User talk:Nothingbutthetruth2006
September 2024
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at R. C. Majumdar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 15:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Kindly specify by what You mean by "unconstructive edits". Because all My edits have been backed by academics and with proper citations. Unless You are against the nuanced representation of his views I do not see how they are "unconstructive". Nothingbutthetruth2006 (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Ratnahastin (talk) 10:49, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Lets Make Some Edits to the RC Majumdar Piece which will provide some nuanced view.
[edit]What if we create a new subsection titled "Legacy" in which we discuss his legacy on the history profession of india. we can discuss both his appreciates and his critics. Nothingbutthetruth2006 (talk) 16:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.