User talk:OdNahlawi

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Wiiformii (talk) 01:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hi, I noticed your contributions to Nahal Arugot, which appear to be constructive. Thank you for contributing to the expansion of short and stub articles on Wikipedia.

That said, I have noticed that some of the content you added appears to be uncited. We usually require all content and information to be cited to a reliable source. You may wish to explicitly cite the source by putting your source of information about this geographical feature (which doesn't have to be online) into a {{cite}} template. Uncited content, even if it appears to be true and constructive, may be liable to being summarily removed. Thank you and happy editing. Fermiboson (talk) 09:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. OdNahlawi (talk) 10:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from he:אגם החולה to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example:

Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 💬 03:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I started with a translation but most of the content right now is original content that I wrote and worked on it quite hard... anyway, thank you very much. I will make sure to follow the rules. OdNahlawi (talk) 07:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moshik Lipetz moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Moshik Lipetz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknow? (talk) 08:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll work on it some more. thanks. OdNahlawi (talk) 10:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from he:נחל מירב to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 💬 02:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you are right I usually put the template... here I must have forgotten, thanks. OdNahlawi (talk) 13:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, عمليات انتحارية فلسطينية

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, عمليات انتحارية فلسطينية. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Palestinian suicide attacks. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Palestinian suicide attacks. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DuncanHill (talk) 15:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Massive removal

You removed more than 11,000 bytes worth of content here with a fairly inadequate explanation. Nor do I see any explanation on the talk page. Such large scale changes are unhelpful.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 06:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I explained the edits in its summary, and it looks like I also removed some content by mistake though (I think it was after an edit conflict?) but if you disagree you can start a discussion on the talk page, or just revert it, I don't understand why we're talking one specific edit on my talk page. Next time please contact me on the article's page. OdNahlawi (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hezbollah page

I noticed that someone made changes to the Hezbollah article, without consensus or reliable sources. Would you like to help update that page? Many of the sources are outdated, citing information from over 10 years ago. With Israel currently at war with Hezbollah, it's important to provide accurate and current information to the English-speaking audience who may not be familiar with Hezbollah.

It's a large page that has been neglected over the years and because it's a consensus subject, trimming unneeded and old sources can be hard; fixing it will have a direct impact on educating people who need information to understand current events going on in the world. RCSCott91 (talk) 18:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move-war

You moved 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike to Attempted assassination of Hassan Nasrallah without consensus on talk page. Our guidelines recommend using RM to make a move that is potentially considered controversial. I reverted your move, and I started a RM. While that RM is going on there is a notice at the very top of the page that says "Please do not move this article until the discussion is closed." Did you see that notice?

But you made that move again. Worst of all is that you have made no attempt to discuss your changes on the talk page. WP:BOLDMOVE says "Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again." (emphasis not added)

Please undo your move. Pinging ScottishFinnishRadish.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 11:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I am sorry, I didn't notice the move request. As this is a new article I thought it would be fine to move it. I will write my opinion to the discussion. I see my move has been already undone anyway OdNahlawi (talk) 15:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OdNahlawi you moved the article twice. Clearly you were aware of the first move, since you're the one who moved it? Ergo, you knew that someone undid your move, and instead of trying to discuss, you decided to move again? VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 22:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]