User talk:Qazormator

Because it garnered exactly zero Google hits. A "black Nazi?" If this is a legit term, it really needs to be backed up with verifiable support. - Lucky 6.9 14:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

aha i belive you

THIS IS AN OLD TERM!!! THE INTERNET IS NOT THAT OLD. I SHOULD KNOW BETTER I LIVED THROUGH THE WAR

Relax. I believe you. It just needs some verifiable support. If it was a widespread term, it would garner some Google hits. Otherwise, it comes off as a hoax or at best a local term that fell out of use before it caught on. - Lucky 6.9 14:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NawlinWiki 14:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, you really need to cite your sources before this gets dumped again. Stay cool; just trying to help. - Lucky 6.9 14:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate Wasserpipi without providing a verifiable source showing that this term is notable. NawlinWiki 14:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Introduction

Although you are allowed to play with this page, you in fact ended up vandalizing it. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - also - regarding what you posted there Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at Wikipedia:Introduction. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create such pages will blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHell 15:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD notice

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHell 14:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the British International School, Budapest article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --ArmadilloFromHell 14:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Gergo Szetlik

Your recent edit to Gergo Szetlik (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Puck Brouwer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ArmadilloFromHell 14:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--My friend edited that like 2 days ago, when he was using my computer

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

NawlinWiki 14:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]