User talk:Raiday

Welcome!

Hello, Raiday, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Raiday/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Raiday/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Raiday/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, Raiday. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created User:Raiday/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject."Before you start writing, gather a list of indisputably reliable sources that are entirely independent of the [subject] and that devote significant coverage to the [subject]. Once you have that list of high quality sources, format them into references. Referencing for beginners explains how. Now, neutrally summarize what the sources say, avoiding any promotional language. You can find much more detailed advice at Your first article." --per Cullen328" Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Persistent posters of promotional content may be blocked from editing. Posters of promotional content with promotional usernames may be blocked on sight.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

This notice is information dense. Please carefully read and thoroughly understand the linked information before attempting further article creation.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it was my first article, sorry!

Pls unblock me and change mu username and to mu name.surname

I will read the policies again and I didn't mention to advertise anything, I was just creating a page for my company, which I understand seems against the policy. I had seen many pages for many companies published already , but I understand now the rules.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Raiday (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

antonello.supino (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

i read the policies better

Decline reason:

Once you do, and once you can convince us you understand and will comply with WP:COI and WP:PROMO, make a new unblock request. There's no rush, take your time. Yamla (talk) 18:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamala, I have read the two articles.

I have 18 years of experience in data and AI, I can add value to wikipedia by adding articles on areas that are not yet documented, for example for "ai aggregator" you don't have a definition yet, I would be able to add it. Raiday (talk) 07:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please unblock my user? Raiday (talk) 11:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Raiday (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

antonello.supino (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I use this as my personal account I understood the policies about advertisement, I won't make the same mistake again in the future Raiday (talk) 03:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Many people tell us that they understand something and then go on to show that they actually don't. You must demonstrate your understanding to us, by telling us what was wrong with your edits, what you will do differently, and tell what edits you will make. This request does not do these things. You also say above that you want to edit about AI; that falls squarely within your conflict of interest and paid editing relationship, so you won't be unblocked to, at least in the short term, do that. 331dot (talk) 06:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply" to edit this page; the reply function does not work well in every situation. I also merged your requests, only a single open request is needed at a time, you don't need separate requests for your username and the block. 331dot (talk) 06:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Raiday (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I was blocked because I was posting a link that was advertising my site raiday.ai in contravention to the Wikipedia Policies, which I read and I understand. This was the first time and I find unfair an indefinite block without not even a warning. Please unblock me and I will only contribute other content and never link or reference my business anymore.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand I was blocked because I was posting a link that was advertising my site raiday.ai in contravention to the Wikipedia Policies, which I read and I understand. This was the first time and I find unfair an indefinite block without not even a warning. Please unblock me and I will only contribute other content and never link or reference my business anymore. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand I was blocked because I was posting a link that was advertising my site raiday.ai in contravention to the Wikipedia Policies, which I read and I understand. This was the first time and I find unfair an indefinite block without not even a warning. Please unblock me and I will only contribute other content and never link or reference my business anymore. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand I was blocked because I was posting a link that was advertising my site raiday.ai in contravention to the Wikipedia Policies, which I read and I understand. This was the first time and I find unfair an indefinite block without not even a warning. Please unblock me and I will only contribute other content and never link or reference my business anymore. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

We take promotional editing very seriously, and act to stop it when identified. Please tell what other topics you will edit about since you are agreeing to not edit about your business. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]