User talk:RevolutionaryPatriot

Inquire.

Question

Hello, @RevolutionaryPatriot. Are you connected to the account User:Kamal Afghan01 ? ThethPunjabi (talk) 04:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no, but i recognize the name from when i was on Afghan Articles. Why? RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 12:22, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, RevolutionaryPatriot!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Pathans of Sindh

added a link pointing to Shinwari

Zamand

added a link pointing to Dir

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Swabi District, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 07:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malak Ahmad Khan Yusufzai has been accepted

Malak Ahmad Khan Yusufzai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 08:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pathans of Sindh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shinwari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Gandgarh, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense留 08:46, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Gandgarh was an Afghan Victory, it was changed to Sikh victory for the outlined reason that the previous contributors were banned socket accounts, for this purpose he changed the battle result? It was at 21:16, 13 July 2023‎. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 08:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that multiple other editors have added in the 'Afghan Victory' part, which was the actual conclusion. Are you going to approach them about vandalism too? Lmao RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 08:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was my bad, I did not use adequate discrimination, but it was in the context of many edits which are unacceptable on Wikipedia regarding WP:NPOV. You make a lot of worthwhile edits, but it is important to use encyclopedic language. Remsense留 08:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kalu Khan Yousafzai. Remsense留 08:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will not respond to that, please realise that these pages can be viewed by anyone and save yourself some embarrassment. Now i'm telling you, stop tampering with a Wikipedia article and my contributions. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 08:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Aziz Khan Kaka has been accepted

Abdul Aziz Khan Kaka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Merry Christmas, and a happy new year)} 18:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More evidence that the Daoud emblem needs to be reverted. Your version was accurate.

1) Search up “Sardar Mohammed Dawood khan 1974” by Pamir Studio Tv (on YouTube) and skip to 10:55 (I apologize for the inconvenience, it won’t let me link you to YouTube) 2) This pin ==> https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/195745866178 3) Please feel free to zoom in on this Afghan government almanac from 1974. http://afghandata.org:8080/xmlui/handle/azu/15354 4) Same for the 1975 almanachttp://afghandata.org:8080/xmlui/handle/azu/15355 5) Check out these coins from the period https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/afghanistan-250-afghanis-km-979-1978-cuid-1044108-duid-1219976 https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces59044.html AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 20:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes perfect evidence, although the guy didn't really care about the truth regardless. I'm not so experienced with this website anyways, what can I do more? Thank you, and I'll vote in favour of and support any decision for restoration of the National flag of the Afghan Republic. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 06:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to get a moderator involved. I don’t know if this also counts as evidence, but my uncle served in the army under Daoud and he says this new emblem is “not the same” in his own words. AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 03:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, It's a browser thing. I'll keep that in mind. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 04:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Air Vice-Marshal Leslie William Cannon.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Air Vice-Marshal Leslie William Cannon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 11:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions

You didn't provide a source in support of this addition. And so is this one. Add a WP:RS in support of the subject's caste, otherwise it will be removed. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

blacklisted website from Wikipedia.

RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 10:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which one? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indianetzone

ttps://www.indianetzone.com/62/raja_habib_ur_rahman_khan.htm

If you can't access it looks like this

Full text: .txt RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 11:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a reliable source. Can you find a book source? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added the new book source which mentions his rajput family origin of Punjeri RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page number? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the ref says 156

search habibur on the google books search RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 13:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source says Chib. We'd need a source which proves that Chibs are Rajputs. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

its talking about this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chibhal RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, add that source to this entry. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kakazai, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The article even names the places where the Kakazai, also known as Loi Mamund (For example, see the Tribal Konar Map for "Wur" and "Mamund Kakazai" produced by the United States Naval Postgraduate School, Culture and Conflict Studies at https://nps.edu/documents/105988371/107571254/Kunar+Tribal+Map.pdf/a40becc4-2ff3-4943-93f5-6d03b7658c47) located within Afghanistan including Kunar/Konar. McKhan ^(talk) 07:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are no Kakazai people in Afghanistan, no one on wikipedia can show me any. It is the place of origin of a tribe whose members are only found in West Punjab, Indians too. I guess it could still be kept until more of this tribe is learnt of. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 10:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you can read Pashto, then see http://web.archive.org/web/20160303234815/http://www.scprd.com/navi_leekane_show.php?id=795, https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054104/http://www.scprd.com/paos_show.php?id=2242, http://www.tolafghanistan.com/%D9%BE%DA%9A%D8%AA%D8%A7-%D9%86%D9%87-%DA%85%D9%88%DA%A9-%D8%AF%D9%8A/ and http://www.tolafghanistan.com/app/download/5806295390/latifyada.pdf McKhan ^(talk) 16:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting listing. A tribe completely shifted to West Punjab and cannot be identified with by any people in Afghanistan, only the Mahmund tribe. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 09:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not "Mahmund" but Mamund/Mamond. "Mahmund" or "Mohmand" is a different tribe. Although it doesn't matter as per the Wikipedia guidelines, I know quite a few Kakazai (Loi Mamund) people in Kunar and beyond in Afghanistan, a fact which has also been noted by the authors of the articles I provided above along with the NPS map. Just like other Pashtuns, Kakazai lives in Pakistan, Afghanistan and beyond. McKhan ^(talk) 16:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello RevolutionaryPatriot. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but recent edits of yours to the page Yusufzai have edit summaries that are inadequate and inappropriate. Summaries should be helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did and the reason for the change. Edit summaries are not for venting or complaining about other editors. Please follow the guidance in WP:EDITSUMCITE in the future. If you are reverting an edit because it violates policies or guidelines, you should also be specific about the policies or guidelines involved. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is very helpful to point out, for other editors to know. Do you feel what you saw on that article is a frequent occurrence? I'm not sure why the decision for 1 week was chosen, when I already wrote that it has been going on for months, the user has edits going to other articles by months too.

He'll be back, but I guess thats his 1 week off break of writing his own history. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 08:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 23:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

RegentsPark (comment) 04:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indian MUtiny

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 11:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note only the most recent edit can be classified as an 'edit war', everything beforehand was me fixing the article. Just note, I was fixing the article. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 13:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, and edit that reverts any editor is a revert, I count 3 over the last 24 hours, and as I will report you if you do it again (as such this is my last comment, take it to the articles talk page and make a case). Note as well wp:3rr is not an upper limit, you can edit warring if you make the same edit 7 times in a week. Note as well that being right is not a justification for edit waring. Slatersteven (talk) 13:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Sutyarashi. I noticed that you recently removed content from Awan (tribe) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

In future, please also make sure to check references first before altering the content. Sutyarashi (talk) 09:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RevolutionaryPatriot. Thank you for your work on Shitakzai. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT. An easy to use redirect user script is User:Eejit43/scripts/redirect-helper.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 20:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Shuja Khanzada

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 22:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessarily changing transliteration

How is this edit of yours to Ziaur Rahman constructive? There are a multitude of ways to transliterate Bengali names. Wikipedia sticks to the transliteration by which the person is best known, unless reliable sources show that they changed their preferred transliteration at some point. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood as vandalism. Your change has been removed and archived in the page history for now. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So that readers know how to understand such a name. They will otherwise think Ziaur is a real name, which it is not. His name is Zia-ur-Rehman. His name is Zia. With this information they also know how to pronounce his name. It was put at the starting body of the paragraph so they make the link from then on on what this name means. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You must start using edit summaries

Other editors should not have to spend time figuring out why you’re making changes. If you can’t do that I may have to restrict you to talk pages. Doug Weller talk 17:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then they can ask me. In what context were my changes controversial/wrong that I didn't leave a summary for it? RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Abdali Airport

Hello, RevolutionaryPatriot

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username ToadetteEdit and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Abdali Airport, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 8 § Abdali Airport.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ToadetteEdit}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ToadetteEdit (talk) 15:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm HandThatFeeds. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Joseph Goebbels is proud is beyond the pale. Do not attack other editors again. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 12:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's true. Repeating and repeating till you comprehend no other narrative. Pretty sure many educators (both School and University) even in the United States would agree with what i'm saying, for the most part you are all just raised a certain way and it carries onto the way you interact on wikipedia regarding such a topic. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 06:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Talk:1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre) for a period of 1 week for Personal attack. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 16:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing articles directly

You were warned strongly about not using edit summaries above, with an explanation of how important it is. Your reply indicated that you weren't prepared to consider the convenience of other editors ("Then they can ask me"), and indeed you have gone on just as before: no edit summaries. As Doug Weller warned you might happen, I have therefore blocked you from editing articles directly for a month. You can still edit talkpages, including making requests for article edits. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. If I were you, I would do some editing of talkpages, with explanatory edit summaries, before appealing the block, to show willing. But that's just my advice; what you do is up to you. Bishonen | tålk 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Show me which edit I did that had no summary. I don't know what you're talking about. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 10:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't know what I'm talking about? Strange. For your over 100 edits since the warning, you have only provided an edit summary in one case. An automatic tag such as "Reply" isn't an edit summary you provide, explains nothing, and is altogether useless in itself. Your response to the warning above showed that you understood this perfectly well. Bishonen | tålk 10:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

And then there is the :Joseph Goebbels is proud comment as well. From what RP says about, there may be a NOTHERE issue also. Doug Weller talk 11:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once more, you fail to show me any edit summary. The only one brought up was Ziaur Rahman. Which by the way, Ziaur is not a real single word name, Zia is a name. My edit was reverted solely because the editors that did it are unfamiliar with that topic area culture. A Bengali/South Asian editor wouldn't have reverted my edit.

I don't know if we're looking at the same records here, i've had a scroll of my contributions and everything I do is so minor, and you can see I have lines written in my edit summaries whenever it mattered to do so. Are you making a mistake or something? RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have explained fully, and I don't understand what it is you don't understand. Again, you can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator (= not me, and not Doug Weller) by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 13:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

What is your issue with comprehending what I wrote? I am saying my edits are minor, myself and millions more editors will probably continue not leaving edit summaries when we fix a link, adjust an infobox and change a spelling.

Your comment is dated after Doug Wellers, so my assumption would be what he wrote is your explanation.

I didn't believe at first that the act of adding text to an article warrants an edit summary, though by that logic I'm not sure what makes a "minor" edit in the first place. I'm well aware and respect the both of our intelligence enough to say that's not the reason you did this, perhaps you did it because you object to certain edits of mine you feel threatened by or something? Regardless we both know you don't consistently give month ban to editors for this reason, or even as so much as give a warning, just happens to have been done to me.

There is no need for you to bring up unblocking with an uninvolved administrator. I'm just inquiring on what you did by asking you about it, I haven't asked you once to unblock me have I. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 13:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, they aren't minor. WP:MINOR says what is minor, you are, for instance, adding text. Not a lot, but still not minor. By the way, did you accidentally edit logged out here?[1] It looks to be you, and I can remove the IP address if you like. It does give location. Doug Weller talk 13:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope not mine RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 13:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the help page Help:Edit summary. If you'd show even a little awareness of why for example this or this (especially since it's a pretty inappropriate, and unexplained, addition to the very first sentence) requires an edit summary, and would undertake to use explanatory edit summaries in the future, I'd consider unblocking you. Bishonen | tålk 11:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]