User talk:Saraheperry2/sandbox
Comments on Bibliography
[edit]Sarah: There aren't many references in the spreadsheet that deal directly with conservation, probably because this species does not appear to be threatened. As a result, you've looked at peripheral papers, which is appropriate. The IUCN redlist website is always a good first place to look because this will indicate the status and known threats, as well as conservation actions. You should reference this site. Njclum (talk) 17:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Comments on Outline
[edit]Sarah: Given that most of your citations are peripheral to your subject, I think you've done a good job of extracting potentially relevant information. Ideally, an outline would gather the material in an organized form that would reflect the structure of your draft.Njclum (talk) 17:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Comments on Rough Draft
[edit]Sarah: Excellent job!Njclum (talk) 17:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)