User talk:SawyerHewitt

November 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John Paul Jones (musician). Block evasion by User:Gustavo Picanço, recently blocked as User:Zapho653. Binksternet (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just because my edits are similar to the users that you appointed it doesn't mean I am them. Also, there were actual mistakes in many of the articles. Take for instance Jeffrey Hammond's, whose place of origin is the same as his birthplace, therefore there is no need for the topic origin to be added in the infobox. SawyerHewitt (talk) 03:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also added links in the Jethro Tull that made the article about progressive rock be accessed, which you reverted. Therefore there is nothing wrong with those edits except apparently for the fact that I made them. If it was someone else doing them, would you revert their edits as well just because their edits resemble edits by blocked accounts or IPs? SawyerHewitt (talk) 03:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:EVADE, every edit you make in violation of your block may be reverted regardless of whether the edit is constructive. You are not welcome to edit anything at all on Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 04:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. So if someone else made those edits, you would be OK with it, or you would just do the same thing? SawyerHewitt (talk) 04:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]