Jump to content

User talk:Shefali wiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shefali Razdan Duggal, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/5630/t/4281/content.jsp?content_KEY=2619.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Shefali Razdan Duggal, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Andy Walsh (talk) 06:04, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your undeletion request

[edit]

Hello, I will try to address your concerns concisely.

On the issue of copyright, I understand what occurred. For you to use any of that copyrighted text here, we need permission to be "officially" granted. For instructions on how to do this, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials, specifically the heading "Granting us permission to copy material already online".

Now the stickier part. We strongly discourage conflict-of-interest editing, which is what you are attempting. The main reason is that Wikipedia strives to be neutral. I'm sure you can understand that it is exceedingly difficult for a subject to be neutral when they write about themselves, as it is for a company that had been paid to publish the material. So, even if you grant permission for the copyrighted text to be used, it is highly likely to be drastically altered, trimmed, or even deleted as promotional material.

I understand that you've been paid to do this so you're probably going to go ahead with it—but please bear these things in mind, especially that you cannot control the content once it is published here. --Andy Walsh (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 20:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shefali wiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This account is not being used for advertising. This account was created to make a specific article. If I've said anything that I'm not supposed to, I will be more careful in the future. Shefali wiki (talk) 17:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

While single purpose accounts are not forbidden, accounts that do nothing but try to force particular content that is not appropriate into Wikipedia are. If you can't see how that applies to you then I'm afraid we will have to leave you blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.