User talk:Srcevatreno

Multiple accounts

Hello, I have blocked the WillBond (talk · contribs) account, as you are not supposed to contribute using multiple accounts. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Srcevatreno (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The user Mattythewhite (talk · contribs) has blocked me, he said that the reason is "contribute using multiple accounts", but he's wrong! I have used two different accounts, because one (WillBond (talk · contribs)) is MINE, and the other Srcevatreno (talk · contribs) is my sister's account!, I think that the real reason of the block, is an aggressive plot against me, due to a Personal dislike and aversion against me! ( this "Personal dislike" is due a - proper- edit I did on a Always Learning (talk · contribs)'s work on the "Early Life" section in the page of the footballer Radja Nainggolan), so this is not a block due to encyclopedic or practical reasons; is just a personal aggression against me, an aggression started and made by the user: Always Learning (talk · contribs) , (with the collaboration of Mattythewhite (talk · contribs)) and on the bottom of Mattythewhite (talk · contribs)'s talk page you can find and read some of what I'm talking about! where is clear the aversion about me! here I report a part of the improper text on the user Mattythewhite's talk page:

== Updates / Others ==

1 - Radja Nainggolan: no further proof needed that it's one guy operating two accounts, WILLBOND replied on the page of the other account, SCREVATRENO! Furthermore, on the mentioned article, he proceeded to revert me again on the trans_titles and the dates of refs, also urging me to leave the article alone because he knows what he's doing. I have re-messaged Mr.Bond, telling him i thank him for him improvement of article and that i did not erase anything, merely cleaned the EARLY LIFE section up.

He says he speaks Indonesian fluently, so i've suggested he provides translations for the refs which are in Indonesian as a means of teamwork. Let's see where he'll head to (like i don't know). I thank you for reinstating the message he removed, but please drop a line there when you can, about the technicalities which he does not (or does but does not care) understand.

2 - User:Icarusgeek: regarding the cat/subcat issue, not one word of reply (one more giving me the treatment of silence extraordinaire, WHY? He's 100% active as of today), not in his page, not in my page.

3 - i apologize for my foul language (again!) in regards of the situation of the Bruma vandal, i just lose it in these situations. Since i (i? We ALL know) the person(s) doing this is (are) not retarded or a three-year old, they are just doing it to: 1 - aggravate us well-intended users; 2 - act like a dictator in a totalitarian state with dystopian coating ("I will censor everything negative, i only want positive things to be said about my subjects").

But please, reply to my question that concerns the issue above, because i was in no way doubting your best (admin) judgement, i'm really at a loss as to why some punishments are harder than others, when the crime is the same in its gravity. I can't remember if you really answered this doubt of mine last year, otherwise i wouldn't be nagging you again about it of course.

Kind regards --AL (talk) 15:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*You chose to block one of the accounts, i better prepare for some old-school insulting, hope to be wrong (which may be the case since he still has one left). Don't know why but this situation, which happened four or five years ago, came to mind, when i told User:Etzo to please not remove club categories just because a player had left X or Y club, and his response was "You're playing God on Wikipedia, that's not nice". What the hey?! We have since made amends though. --AL (talk) 18:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for taking so long, only now read your message better and saw your request about B.Corinthiano. Have already shown you that in the past mate, but i'll gladly do it again (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/177.0.204.119) --AL (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WELL IS THIS OR NOT THE "FREE ENCYCLOPEDIA"? WHY I MUST TO BE UNJUSTLY BLOCKED BY PERSONAL (AGGRESSIVE)THOUGHTS OF OTHER (USERS)PEOPLE?, well, if I will not be soon Unblocked, if necessary, I will have to take legal action, against the two users.

Decline reason:

So you're saying that you're not sockpuppets of each other but rather meatpuppets, however this does not change anything. And blaming the others is not helping your cause either. Max Semenik (talk) 10:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Whaat?! You say i don't like you and am working against you? How, when i never even met you in my life? I have already said "thank you" for improving Nainngolan's page, i only CLEANED IT UP and did not REMOVE anything, you have done a very good job improving the player's page, i contributed too and did not remove anything you added, you did (the translations, the languages and the dates on the references, i repeat, let that be clear), but all in all it was a good teamwork, we should BOTH be happy about it instead of these accusations.

Speaking about the accusations, i spoke to Matty about the two accounts because it's not allowed on WP for a user to have two accounts (ANY user, including you, Matty and myself) and both sets of contributions were 100% similar, so i thought this was a case of sockpuppetry. I spoke to Matty and it was HIS choice to block you, i did not ask him to do it OK?

And now you threat me with legal action? I really want you to show me EXACTLY, in the point #1 in the message i sent Matty which you copied to here, where i was unkind and aggressive to you, because i can't see it anywhere. I again, apologize for not knowing the other account was your sister's.

Attentively --AL (talk) 19:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Srcevatreno/WillBond, I highly recommend you read this page before making any legal threats. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that English is not your first language, so maybe you misunderstood some of the words i wrote. But it's not enough, in my opinion, for this attitude towards me and the legal threats. Sorry for any inconvenience if i offended you. --AL (talk) 21:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Antonio Vojak may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

vojak.html|title=Antonio Vojak Značenje|trans_title=Antonio Vojak's Meaning|publisher=Znacenje.info)|work=www.znacenje.info|language=Croatian}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]