User talk:TheRithik

Welcome!

Hello, TheRithik! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 18:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheRithik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my actions were perceived as advertising or self-promotion, and I sincerely apologize for any disruption this caused. I now fully recognize that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that values neutrality and notability above all. In future contributions, I will ensure that my edits comply with these principles and avoid conflicts of interest. I will focus on improving Wikipedia in a constructive and policy-compliant manner. I kindly request reconsideration of my block so I can contribute positively. Thank you. TheRithik (talk) 08:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please be more specific than this general statement. What did you do wrong? What will you do differently? What edits do you intend to make? (Such as what articles or topic areas) 331dot (talk) 12:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request Reason:

I now understand that my previous edits violated Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Specifically, I realize that my edits were promotional in nature, which is not aligned with Wikipedia’s goal of maintaining neutrality. I apologize for this oversight.

I have since reviewed the relevant policies, including the guidelines on conflict of interest and notability, and I fully understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view and adhering to notability standards.

Moving forward, I plan to focus on contributing to articles that are unrelated to any personal or business interests. Specifically, I will concentrate on expanding and improving articles related to [insert topics unrelated to any conflicts of interest here, e.g., open-source software, public domain historical events, etc.], ensuring that all contributions are properly sourced and meet Wikipedia's neutrality and notability requirements.

I kindly request that you reconsider my block, and I assure you that any future contributions will comply fully with Wikipedia’s content policies.

Thank you for your consideration.

I would discuss unblocking you, but with you, not a chatbot. Try again in your own words and without the bot, please. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 16:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting unblock

I have understood the reason for my block, the article that i published is more like advertising and promotional which is against the Wikipedia polices, I had learned from my mistake as this is my 1st article kindly please accept my apologie and unblock me

Thank you for considering my request

Firstly, it appears pretty clear that you are being compensated to edit, either directly or by being asked or expected to as a duty of employment. Is that correct? If so, why were the required disclosures not made? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly no one had paid me anything i had made this article out of my interest i heard about this company this is a aerospace startup company were they are working to build the EVTOL, when i talked to them i felt there journey inspiring and i want to write an article on there company as my 1st article but as this is my 1st article i made the mistake of overseeing the polices of Wikipedia and used some words which are more likely advertising and self promotion, Now i understood clearly about the policy's next time when i write an article i will look over my words, and my source for the article carefully

Not sure I buy that, but given that you assert that, if you were to be unblocked, it would be on condition that you do not do any more editing about Agmay whatsoever. Do you have anything else you're interested in editing? If so, what? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i accept your condition and i won't do any more editing on Agmay, yes i am interested in editing more on the technology side like how the new technologies are entering into the markets, how these technologies are changing the human needs etc. TheRithik (talk) 20:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked your account per that condition. I will also note that creating an appropriate new article is quite difficult, so I recommend gaining experience editing existing articles before you try a new one. Once you think you are ready, use of the draft and articles for creation process initially is probably better than jumping straight to creation in mainspace. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding, i will follow your advice and work on some existing articles, once again thank you for unblocking me TheRithik (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade:, this editor appears to have reconsidered his acceptance of your simple and clear unblock condition by re-creating a new draft at Draft:Agmay and submitting it. Any objections to reapplying the block? Sam Kuru (talk) 10:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now reblocked, thanks for letting me know. As to you, TheRithik, appeal instructions are as above, but don't bother asking me again. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 11:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Agmay has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Agmay. Thanks! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 09:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agmay (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agmay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheRithik! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, TheRithik. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Agmay, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]