User talk:Xxcupcakeloverxxo

Welcome!

Hello, Xxcupcakeloverxxo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Aimee Ayingcha Cowell, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ben Ben (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aimee Ayingcha Cowell

The article Aimee Ayingcha Cowell has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ben Ben (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Nak Soo Fah Tawan(Aimee&Emma).jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nak Soo Fah Tawan(Aimee&Emma).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aimee Ayingcha Cowell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aimee Ayingcha Cowell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimee Ayingcha Cowell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ben Ben (talk) 09:28, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Aimee Ayingcha Cowell, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 01:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aimee Ayingcha Cowell

The article Aimee Ayingcha Cowell has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Go Phightins! (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Aimee Ayingcha Cowell

A tag has been placed on Aimee Ayingcha Cowell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 02:29, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 02:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can provide significant new, reliable sourcing for this biography, please do not reintroduce material that was deleted after a deletion discussion. The article as it stands does not meet Wikipedia's requirements for biographies of living persons. Acroterion (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Destiny: The shadow of tear

The article Destiny: The shadow of tear has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased films do not meet the future films policy.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ubelowme _U ^Me 15:15, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Destiny: The shadow of tear

A tag has been placed on Destiny: The shadow of tear, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Very little context, may be a hoax (cannot find refs) etc

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 02:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merely changing the name does not make the article acceptable. Please either provide appropriate references that support the subject's notability and biographical information, or stop posting the articles. Acroterion (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]