Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Foaming grasshopper

Foaming grasshopper

Original - Foaming grasshopper from south africa

Reason: It's pretty. Also perhaps this will inspire an article.
Articles this image appears in: None. We need one!
Creator: User:Guest9999

Retract Support as nominator The comments are right, it is blurry. I didn't check the full size version. It is pretty though. I don't know how you close a nomination. Ariel. (talk) 01:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Blurry. ^8thstar 02:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Blurry. Rudy Breteler (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ineligible. Must be in an article. Speedy close. --jjron (talk) 03:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Samsara noadmin (talk) 11:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What species is it?--Svetovid (talk) 12:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close too few pixels on subject, blurry, no article. Snowball's chance. de Bivort 13:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I was able to improve the image somewhat by sharpening and downsampling. However, while the original crop was

of sufficient size, the downsampling was rather necessary, and the image is now clearly too small imho. Samsara (talk • contribs) 21:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Doesn't appear in an article and thus fails criteria #5. Cacophony (talk) 03:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose First, nothing in the picture is in focus, not even the grasshopper. Second, it doesn't appear in any article. the crop and sharpen does not help either, because it is too far out of focus for a sharpen to help. Clegs (talk) 19:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose both by Clegs. —αἰτίας •discussion• 12:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose per everything already said. Juliancolton ^{(The Giants Win!)} 21:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 08:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]