Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kayleigh Pearson

Reason: After checking the criteria I believe that the image meets the standards set for a Featured Picture.
Articles this image appears in: Kayleigh Pearson
Creator: Jimbo online

Support as nominator ----Jimbo^[online] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, busy background, poor lighting. -- Coneslayer (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agreed. Not bad for a user-shot photo in the article, but not really a FP-quality portrait. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 19:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above comments. Clegs (talk) 23:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per above. Noodle snacks (talk) 06:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "After checking the criteria I believe that the image meets the standards set for a Featured Picture." I don't. To busy, taken from too high an angle and flash is too strong. Capital photographer (talk) 07:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Obvious fail here, but that is not to say that I didn't thoroughly enjoy this picture. smooth0⁷0₇ (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mmm. Oh, uh ... yeah. It's really not FP quality, just a standard snapshot-esque photo. ¢rassic! (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the points mentioned by Coneslayer, Diliff and Crassic. —αἰτίας •discussion• 20:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted . --John254 18:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]