Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lava tube
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 May 2012 at 19:12:17 (UTC)
- Reason
- Good quality, impressive and high educational value for lava tube
- Articles in which this image appears
- Lava tube
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
- Creator
- Frank Schulenburg
- Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose I really don't like the sodium vapor lamp lighting; it takes away from the EV by making it look completely different than it would in natural light. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 01:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Wouldn't it look entirely undifferentiated black without lights? 75.41.109.190 (talk) 14:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't looking for a photo with no lighting (that would be silly), I wanted one with white lighting; as it stands now you can't tell the actual color of the walls. I know they're black, but a FP is supposed to show that they're black. That's the EV criterion. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 00:26, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- 75.41.109.190: The photographer could e.g. light paint the walls with a flash to provide white light in this case. JJ Harrison (talk) 01:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't looking for a photo with no lighting (that would be silly), I wanted one with white lighting; as it stands now you can't tell the actual color of the walls. I know they're black, but a FP is supposed to show that they're black. That's the EV criterion. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 00:26, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Wouldn't it look entirely undifferentiated black without lights? 75.41.109.190 (talk) 14:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 22:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)