Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2015/11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2015

01 November 2015

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – user re-changing page title even though notified about Template:Requested move and warned. Gizmocorot (talk) 13:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Persistent IP vandalism, changing data figures, without newer references. Richard Harvey (talk) 13:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, other registered users try to explain to them what they are doing is incorrect, however they keep persisting. Vaselineeeeeeee (talk) 15:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – I recently changed the image size, but I just found out that 3,700+ transclude this template. I've not applied to be a template editor yet. George Ho (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 21:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone keeps adding unsourced speculations about upcoming events. Carniolus (talk) 13:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. to give you and the other edit warrior a chance to discuss, which I note neither of you have even tried to do. If edit warring resumes after the protection expires, you can both expect to be blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection Persistent IP vandalism, most probably student based. Richard Harvey (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow persistent vandalism over the last 2 weeks. Perhaps if protected for a month, they will go away. . Onel5969 TT me 21:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 01:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jared Preston (talk) 20:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection. Was protected back in 2012 and has been edited quite slowly since. A new user came in to IRC today wanting to make constructive changes to the article, but couldn't due to the protection (and yes, I know, they can submit a request, but that's not quite the same as getting to do it yourself :) ). Protecting admin Qwyrxian is inactive. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – RfC closed (by me), yet edit warring continues. Please protect with the preferred version™. Elvey(tc) 19:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Could you link to the RfC? The only one I see on the talk page still appears to be open. Elvey. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism that resumed as soon as last semi expired [1][2]. Brianhe (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Brianhe, every edit you disagree with is not vandalism. NeilN talk to me 18:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I realize that. This was weird, with a user claiming that their proprietary latitude/longitude information shouldn't be published on Wikipedia, and they even made a DMCA takedown of information from their website at Internet Archive WebCite (apparently claiming by the way that WP is not a scholarly/fair use) which I was unaware of on this last iteration, hence the label "vandalism". By the way I also engaged them [3] with the comment that if it's that important, they should make a case for oversight -- all the info they don't like is till in the article history. In any event, I'm going to put down the stick now and let this article become whatever it will become. – Brianhe (talk) 21:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Brianhe, I believe it was the link they were objecting to, saying it linked to a copyright violation. Lat/Long are obviously not copyrighted so all that is needed is a source. --NeilN talk to me 04:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not to beat a dead horse but the source I used was was the Zaqistan website itself (author Zaq Landsberg). I believe that one of his associates decided to not only remove the page from his website, but also complained to WebCite that Wikipedia's use of the archived page was a copyright violation by a non-academic work (IANAL but I understand from their FAQ that such a claim by the site owner is required to remove a cached citation). It's this last part that disturbs me and I think sets a very bad precedent for effectively denigrating Wikipedia's importance as a neutral public resource in the eyes of third parties like WebCite, and censoring its content. — Brianhe (talk) 05:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistent re-creation. Fuzheado | Talk 09:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. indef by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 13:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war. I've already restored to the last known good version prior to when the edit war began. —Farix (t | c) 11:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. a couple days by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 13:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP editor using various IPs continues to chronically make the same massive illiterate edits. Many of them come from similar IP blocks, but not all. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 11:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has frequently been a magnet for garbage edits. Lately, however, it's been dogged by WP:BLP violations.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 13:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Move discussion is ongoing but has been moved unilaterally twice already. As a new article, can we move protect at the status quo (which most sources are using) for a few days to get consensus?Lihaas (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Persistent vandalism – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 18:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 18:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three sockpuppets and an edit-warring IP, in the past week. McGeddon (talk) 19:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 19:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive activity involving restoration of contested content resumed after protection expired. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

02 November 2015

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The title of this article is tempting users and IPs alike to vandalize the page with content that is just what the article is about - gibberish. Pending changes to prevent these changes from being made public. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 17:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated namecrufting with BLP issues. John from Idegon (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Highly visible and stable template that should be Semi-protected. --Moxy (talk) 21:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 21:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection Persistent vandalism by unregistered vandals. 117.199.174.115 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. previously banned using 117.199.163.52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Persistent vandalism of same pages, BLP violations; last blocked 1 November for 31 hours. 2015. Also used 117.199.163.52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) previously to vandalise same pages. WikiBulova (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both eh.

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent defamation, continuing after end of recent protection. JNW (talk) 20:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. JNW, no need for a full. NeilN talk to me 20:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To prevent a borderline editor war from IP address, who insists on keeping page created for a concert tour that fails to meet notability standards. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Content dispute, not vandalism NeilN talk to me 16:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two editors have been edit-warring for the past month, each reverting the other dozens of times with no attempt to discuss on the talk page. Either the page should be protected, or both editors blocked, until there is some discussion. RolandR (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm half-tempted to block, but I'll leave a note this time. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Amortias (T)(C) 20:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent copyright violations, IP different each time. Jevansen (talk) 20:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Consistent recreation of AfDed hoax article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 10:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The Drover's Wife, not a hoax and the article has more sources than the one deleted at AFD. NeilN talk to me 15:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. De728631 (talk) 19:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive, non-helpful, and/or vandalism by IP editors. It was previously protected for one week from October 19 to 26, however, I believe a longer duration is needed. Drovethrughosts (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 28 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Until end of first half of season. Samsara 19:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Turnbull35. clpo13(talk) 17:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. two weeks by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 18:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NebY (talk) 18:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NebY (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by unregistered users.CFredkin (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. clpo13(talk) 17:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. NeilN talk to me 18:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 18:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator AlexiusHoratius. NeilN talk to me 18:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 18:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please. Thanks K6ka. DeCausa (talk) 18:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Let me know if you want me to extend the length of protection.) AlexiusHoratius 18:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Claims that he is a KKK member based on allegations by hacker group Anonymous. GABHello! 17:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, IP hopping. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 10:20, 2 November, 2015 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator six months. AlexiusHoratius 17:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like we prot-conflicted, and both prots were granted. It was previously sprotected for 3 months, so elevating to six makes sense to me as problems already resumed back in July when the previous protection ran out. Feel free to disagree and revert me. I've watchlisted it anyway, so revisiting in two weeks is no problem either. Samsara 17:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Six months is fine. AlexiusHoratius 17:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit-warring on a BLP against consensus, to obfuscate the status of fringe, negative conspiracy theory claims about a living person. There exists longstanding consensus on this matter and the user in question is refusing to engage in talk page discussion; rather, is simply engaging in a stale revert war. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 11:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. NeilN talk to me 15:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Three different IPs adding unsourced BLP claims in the past few days. McGeddon (talk) 13:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GB fan. NeilN talk to me 15:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP violations, repeated addition of unsourced and promotional content. After the primary account was blocked, editor keeps adding the content back as an IP. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 13:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Meembers of the DDi and their supports, as well as an occasional person opposing them have edited the article, either adding uncited or unsupported material or removing cited annd referenced material. . Murry1975 (talk) 13:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pokechu22 (talk) 01:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 11:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing that violates the manual style of television concerning verifiable addition of episodes, as outlined by Wikipedia policy. livelikemusic my talk page! 03:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 11:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated IP attempts to emphasis he subjects' conviction against clear consensus. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting indefinite protection. Page has been long-term protected for months due to high-levels of IP and anonymous editor vandalism, and whenever page's protection ends, the same kind of edits immediately resume, like clockwork. Therefore, I believe an indef. block will keep from the addition of original research, not supported by verifialble sources. livelikemusic my talk page! 03:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry talk 05:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unexplained blanking of medal templates by IP address. The same IP has been doing this randomly since 2012 (previously used sock puppets whenever similar articles are protected from IP edits). Wolcott (talk) 06:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent anonymous IP Vandalism . FNQ (talk) 08:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent target of vandalism. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 09:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Cahk (talk) 11:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 11:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: There has been vandalism for years; last one is August 2015. Never had protection for life. George Ho (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 05:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – some vandalizers just keep editing. SzMithrandir (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TL22 (talk) 03:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Two large RfCs currently ongoing. CFCF 💌 📧 00:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, This dispute is not appropriate for protection. The matter is being discussed at the talk page, and I see you are a participant there. When a consensus version materializes, protection can be applied if needed. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism related to the 2015 World Series. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. NeilN talk to me 06:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Unsourced content added (contradicting the existing sources and content) in an apparent personal grudge against one or more parties mentioned in the article. The nature of the content change has been included in the article Talk page Miimno (talk) 06:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To stop the edit warring. Miimno, if challenged I doubt the ancestry.com reference would be considered a reliable source. NeilN talk to me 06:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for attending to this request. The protection will give time to find better sources than personal knowledge or those currently provided. Miimno (talk) 06:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent IP vandalism in the wake of the article subject's recent death. Safehaven86 (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, There are a relatively small number of problematic ip edits; there also are helpful ones, and given the attention the article is receiving, the bad one's should be quickly reverted. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 01:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocks for all the vandals would be divine right about now. . GABHello! 01:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. NeilN talk to me 05:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:Nimishabothra continues to repost long repetitive diatribes of text after they are reverted. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 03:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Gizmocorot (talk) 13:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm seeing a lot of editing, but only a tiny fraction of it is out-and-out vandalism. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Today, since the evening only, following vandals: [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] User:Gizmocorot (talk) 21:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but that is out of 250+ edits in the ast 24 hours, the majority of which were made in good faith, witht he few actual vandals being quickly reverted. Beeblebrox (talk)
In retrospect, better no protection, IP vandals tiny fraction w.r.t. good faith ip contributions... Gizmocorot (talk) 22:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has faced repeated vandalism since last semiprot expired. Article covers one of the most anticipated video games of the year, to be released November 11th. Requesting semiprot through at least November 18th. -- ferret (talk) 16:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism shortly after last protection listed. Subject is a BLP with firm political views, which is causing sectarian abuse on the page. '''tAD''' (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. William Thweatt TalkContribs 22:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes isn't helping prevent additions of a "Poot Lovato" hoax. Previous semi-protection was for one month. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:25, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: There have been reverts lately, vandalism or not. Georgie says "Happy Halloween!" (BOO!) 02:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 22:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 19:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 22:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sam Sailor Talk! 23:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of speedy templates from article on non notable pet. Perhaps create protection is necessary. 2601:188:0:ABE6:7955:2C17:8456:5620 (talk) 14:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could be a possible redirect to Augie Doggie and Doggie Daddy. tutterMouse (talk) 16:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Now deleted, only created once, no opinion on re-creation as a redirect. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - Constant editing and reverting facts despite admin protecting nearly identical content on other pages, such as UH-60 page. Unsourced changes in designations against consensus and precedent on all other similar articles. Removal of facts against consensus and even against admin decisions on similar articles. 2600:1005:B015:551B:D102:A5B9:8A01:370E (talk) 18:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is a block evader, rangeblocked (see Special:Contributions/2600:1005:B045:17C9:E508:6330:3D4:2C77) for repeated disruption on multiple articles. Thomas.W talk 18:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So instead of letting admins review and protect the article as before, you want them to ignore and ban the other user? Sounds like you KNOW you are wrong.
And reverting is allowed if the other members are ignoring the guidelines, or vandalizing. As an admin already locked the information in another entry as legitimate, you and others cannot somehow attempt to quote IMAGINARY guidelines as if the admins dont exist. Do you think you are really making a valid edit if the admins have already stepped in to protect the information from removal on other articles?
You and your brigade have shown blatant disregard for guidelines, INABILITY TO EVEN READ WHAT HAS BEEN POSTED, making false accusations, ignoring admin decisions on other articles, or precedents on nearly every article of its type. You and others have repeatedly quoted non-existent guidelines.
And one member even mistakenly posted a message on the wrong account, revealing his sock puppet.
As the guidelines state, two wrongs do not make a right. You and the other members are equally responsible for your own actions. You cannot complain about others following admin decisions in other articles by ignoring the admin decisions completely and making up your own guidelines. Do you think the admin will just come in and do a complete 180 because you imagined something which is not even stated in the guidelines?
And ALL mobile devices change IP every time they connect to another tower. You cannot go around accusing EVERY mobile user of being an IP skipper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1005:B015:551B:D102:A5B9:8A01:370E (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Per above NeilN talk to me 21:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article was semi-protected a week ago, and does not appear to have had any recent vandalism. . Sahib Chaggar (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The disruption stopped because of the protection. NeilN talk to me 21:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edits by block evading IPs, per [10]. 2601:188:0:ABE6:7955:2C17:8456:5620 (talk) 19:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The diff doesn't substantiate the allegation. Anyway, we have never protected the reference desk and the talk page at the same time and there's no need to start now.

Request unprotection of reference desk per above. 188.222.173.187 (talk) 20:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.38.76 (talk) [reply]

Already protected. It wasn't when the request was firstposted, but it is now. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. The Avengers (talk) 00:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Belongs to the group Hazarika maz. The Avengers (talk) 00:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Created by the sock of above. --The Avengers (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The teams is going bad now and a lot of angry supporters vandalising. Qed237 (talk) 13:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 1 week, PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 22:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - removal of properly sourced and attributed court records. Previous reverts being repeatedly undone 2601:58B:0:50C0:DD62:60B:3B27:3857 (talk) 18:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please read WP:PRIMARY NeilN talk to me 22:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced changes contrary to consensus by IP hopping vandal. SummerPhDv2.0 21:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced changes contrary to consensus by IP hopping vandal. SummerPhDv2.0 21:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of unsourced or poorly sourced material and plot bloat by ip-hopping vandal. Has been directed to talk page and reverted by several editors, is apparently not interested in collaboration. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 15:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A roving ipv6 editor in range 2602:30A:C0FF:DDA0::/64 wants to write an article on this subject and is trying to do so by overwriting an existing article with the same name to do so - persistent. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. – Michael (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03 November 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is subject to repeated and long term vandalism. Currently contains abusive and crude comments. Needs long term protection IMO. Egghead06 (talk) 16:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and pending-changes protected for 3 months MusikAnimal talk 19:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper keeps removing soured content and refuses to discuss on talk. Dbrodbeck (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to request this myself. They've broken 3RR with four reverts in the past 24 hours, from three IP addresses, and have been warned about 3RR in the past. --McGeddon (talk) 17:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; mis-renaming of one title based on a single promo interview. Title not renamed, and current recurring IP edits are purely vandalism at this point. oknazevad (talk) 16:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandals have returned once again now that the previous page protection has expired. Primefac (talk) 17:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. There was also an attack yesterday. CLCStudent (talk) 18:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)\[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and pending-changes protected for a month MusikAnimal talk 19:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - A weird target of persistent sluggish vandalism from seemingly all around the globe for several years. Staszek Lem (talk) 05:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've watchlisted. This will be a better way to keep progress going on that page, which needs help. Samsara 10:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of attempts to inject failures of WP:RS. Is also under WP:BLP and might need a lengthy protection term. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 11:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. MusikAnimal talk 18:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. --Non-Dropframe talk 13:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected by Liz. tutterMouse (talk) 16:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. clpo13(talk) 15:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 18:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be rather active for some reason. William Avery (talk) 17:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Extensive protection log, and disruption resumed as soon as the last one-year period expired MusikAnimal talk 18:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Arman ad60 has persistently and extensively gutted this article, removing entire sections of sourced content they claim is "vague and dirty", without talk page discussion and even after previous reversion. Please apply pending changes protection to this sensitive article while we try to sort this out. . General Ization Talk 02:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. First, this is a content issue. Second, we do not introduce any kind of protection against one user. Second, Arman ad60 is an autoconfirmed user and has been registered for three months, so that PC protection even technically would not help.--Ymblanter (talk) 03:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Very well, thanks. The issue is now being discussed at ANI. General Ization Talk 03:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jevansen (talk) 10:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jim Carter 11:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It looks like a school set book somewhere in the County of Riverside, CA and the kids are having (too much) fun.  Velella  Velella Talk   23:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 23:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I am wondering if this is the first time an AfD is requested for this? I nominated this to force some improvement to this article and expected this to be nominated by a group of well-reasoned editors but all I get is this subject getting upset about his Wikipedia article getting AfD and this anti-bullying "campaigner"'s horde of WP:SPA users coming to this nomination branding me and other editors a troll not forgetting that he is using his Twitter account to encourage others to save his article and making an attack on this nomination as well that he is wishing karma upon us. Donnie Park (talk) 23:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Only the AfD one is. Donnie Park (talk) 01:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. for AfD. AlexiusHoratius 02:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. for Kevin Healey (autism activist). AlexiusHoratius 02:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random IP addresses (all beginning with the same few numbers) keep adding Joker, Catwoman, Talia al Ghul, John Blake and Bane to the section "Recurring cast and characters", when they have each had only single film appearances in the trilogy. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user/sock continues to vandalize page. Wildthing61476 (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. NeilN talk to me 19:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This article and Horus are being vandalized by an anonymous vandal using multiple IPs in order to "make (them) more kid-friendly" by deleting important sections.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This article and Set (deity) are being vandalized by an anonymous vandal using multiple IPs in order to "make (them) more kid-friendly" by deleting important sections.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A very persistent IP from Oxford reinserts original research in violation of WP:CIRCULAR and WP:SPS. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GABHello! 00:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems as if the kids at freep or 4/8chan are targeting this BLP. Dave Dial (talk) 01:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 01:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ever since the discussion was had to remove the large and incorrect list of tables of winners, there have been IPs attempting to re-add the content. I'm getting tired of reverting them every third week. Primefac (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by multi-accounts user. Kvardek du (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User blocked as well. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been the target of an IP editor in Brisbane, Australia. I'd like to request semi-protection as I could be considered "involved" because I reverted their edit. Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Article was semi-protected several years ago, and does not appear to have had any recent vandalism. . Robert McClenon (talk) 18:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see some reverts of copyright violations by one user. George Ho (talk) 02:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
HJ Mitchell? --NeilN talk to me 14:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have a limit on how long a request can hang around? Pining HJ Mitchell for a second time anyway in case he missed the first. tutterMouse (talk) 19:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No strong opinion on this either way. I rarely remember protection I did more than few months ago. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Given that HJ Mitchell doesn't mind I'll give it a try. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 22:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection Edit warring over American Airlines route from Boston to Cancun. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Dispute over inclusion of Azerbaijani people. It's been discussed before on the talk page but has now flared into an edit war. clpo13(talk) 17:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A registered editor applies a template to the article and discusses on the talk page. An unregistered editor repeatedly removes the template with no discussion, only an edit summary. Suggest semi-protection as less draconian than blocking. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of uncited information regarding a sequel to the film, which has not been announced in any way, shape or form by Disney. Almost all edits coming from IP addresses, so semi-protection for a short time (maybe 2 weeks) should prompt them to go elsewhere. McDoobAU93 20:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There has been surge of disruptive editing at this article by SPAs and IPs in the last few days. Probably because the new film has just been released. I think temporary semi-protection is required to keep the article stable. Betty Logan (talk) 21:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of factually incorrect information by IP's and anonymous editors, as well as original research not founded by cited reliable sources. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of the spring preimere airdate without a source. Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 14:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has been the subject of IP genre-warring for years, i.e. the frequent removal of reliably sourced entries. I feel it is time to semi-protect the page for an extended period because short-term protections and individual blocks have had no lasting effect. I am somewhat involved in maintaining the page so I won't touch the tools myself. De728631 (talk)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has not been protected before. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04 November 2015

Full protection: Long-standing content dispute, users revert rather than discuss at the talk page. Ymblanter (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There has been a number of IP's adding unsourced content to this page, including removal of an aircraft type from the table (A340-500) Me and another user keep on having to revert unsourced content from IP's and some other users, and I've had to send out quite a few warnings. . Class455fan1 (talk) 17:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like a content dispute to me, and warnings on user talk pages are no substitute for a real discussion onthe talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. --Non-Dropframe talk 19:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 20:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU (talk) 21:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism over past several hours from multiple accounts, mostly IPs. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For a featured article, that's really not much at all. I'd rather keep a front page article unprotected as long as possible. GedUK  13:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor User:123.16.240.205 is repetitively reposting the same massive text after being reverted. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 10:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm out of practice so I'm not declining it, although I'm inclined to, but have you tried talking on the talk page of the article? Or discussing with the IP editor? It seems to me that what they're trying to add is not vandalism, nor is it incorrect. fish&karate 12:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, Protection isn't necessary if it's just one IP/editor. Actually engage them on conversation rather than templating their talk page. If they continue, then report them to AIV or 3RRN GedUK  13:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP cruft of adding false chart peaks and certifications. Its not just one IP which is doing it. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 14:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The article was protected for a week after the Big Bang Theory sitcom made a joke about this specific Wikipedia article being wrong. Protection has expired and IPs are again editing the article to either match one character's "It says right here on Wikipedia..." line, or other character's verbal corrections of it. McGeddon (talk) 16:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandalism started within 24 hours of protections end. Longer please. John from Idegon (talk) 17:17, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Professor at Hamline University has his Wikipedia article modified in inappropriate ways by several IPs that can be traced back to his university (which is to say, it's likely one or more of his students). Please semi-protect the article for some time. --bender235 (talk) 17:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done MusikAnimal talk 17:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and sockpuppetry by user:Simpleabd. See page history. clpo13(talk) 09:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jim Carter 12:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've speedy deleted the page for G5. GedUK  13:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect: Angela Beesley Starling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). -- Taku (talk) 23:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. No rationale given. bibliomaniac15 07:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I gave no rationale because there is no rationale for the protection in the first place. -- Taku (talk) 10:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the logs there's plenty of rationale, little more digging shows there's been several AfDs for articles relating to this person, the most recent one being the one which actually resulted in protection. If you do want unprotection then you may need to write up a draft which'll confer notability reliably as it's unlikely it'll be unprotected otherwise. tutterMouse (talk) 11:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Geraldo Perez (talk) 09:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like a perfect candidate for PC; low level but persistent. GedUK  13:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Prisencolin (talk) 09:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent changing of template. Other users have also expressed discontent of how the template continues to be changed and redirected to other pages etc. This needs to be protected, users have tried to communicate with Alexander Iskandar (talk · contribs) on their talk page but they never reply. (124.181.75.61 (talk) 10:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Use the talk page to reach a consensus. Once you have that, it can be enforced if necessary. GedUK  13:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 24-hour protection just expired and it seems as if we will have to protect this page a while longer (in focus due to 200th anniversary). : Noyster (talk), 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism recently from at least 3 IP's, vandalism is BLP violating. 109.77.176.49 (talk) 10:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully just drive through. GedUK  13:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Check article's revision history for persistent vandalism record. Edward (tc) 12:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how it goes with a month first. GedUK  13:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ged UK: Okay, thank you! Edward (tc) 19:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent level of IP vandalism of an article with such insignificant name IMO indicates targeted vandalism; unlike relatively infrequent random vandal hits all over my watchlist. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Suggest you ask Samsara. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed after protection was lifted. Areaseven (talk) 01:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Suggest you ask Salvidrim!. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Don't. The Buddy(l/r)oid issue is a long standing dispute that Ryulong continues stoking by proxy despite his ban and for which the "l" side claims to have consensus, which I don't see. This does not meet any definition of vandalism and if edit wars persist, the warring parties should be the targets of enforcement, not the article.  · Salvidrim! ·  06:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of SPA IP disruption, edit-warring, and tag-teaming, despite TP warnings. Seems to be obvious COI trying to promote recent book(s), etc. ETA: Both of the tag-teaming IPs have admitted they are the article subject. Softlavender (talk) 07:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC); edited 07:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recently unprotected, vandalism comes along. George Ho (talk) 07:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. I've just gone back to the indef it had before. With that history and what's happened since protection came off, I don't think PC is sensible and it didn't work last time it was on. GedUK  13:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recurring addition of hoax content and misinformation from anons and nuisance users. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/addition of unsourced information from IPs. Please re-protect. Thanks! Katzenlibrary (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Absurd edit war over a {{NPOV}} tag. The user adding it hasn't explained in detail on the talk page why the tag is necessary, and other editors have removed it accordingly. I'm requesting page protection to force an actual discussion on the talk page instead of warring over the tag. clpo13(talk) 18:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like it already on the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:IP 5.68.249.54 (see their lengthy SPI) keeps reverting any changes to the article, whilst ignoring MOS and other formatting guidelines. Three times in the past four days. Was advised by User:Courcelles that "Liberal use of semi-protection is justified" in the case of this IP. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I am disappointed that even after four reverts the IP still had a red link instead of a talk page. I now left them a message. If they continue reverting without discussion, they should be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 03:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Frequently used and substituted template. George Ho (talk) 22:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by CambridgeBayWeather. tutterMouse (talk) 06:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page can only be editors by template editors or administrators if unprotected since the page's title starts with "Template:Editnotices/". Steel1943 (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected bibliomaniac15 07:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected bibliomaniac15 07:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 04:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 04:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The bot is mistaken, Ym did create protect it. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected, it'll consider semi-salted pages as unprotected unless tagged as create protected, would need to rattle Cyberpower678's cage about that. tutterMouse (talk) 06:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated removal of sourced material by a couple of IPs who seem to be the same person and have at least one more article in common. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 02:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection Repeated POV-pushing by editors who are ignoring WP:UNDUE and WP:LEAD. 107.10.236.42 (talk) 02:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Additions of unsourced/poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I seem to have been hit with a bit of vandalism. Can I get a bit of protection?. reddogsix (talk) 05:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Activision Blizzard has announced a deal to acquire King. Like most any high-profile acquisition, anonymous IPs are jumping the gun and calling the deal sealed and making other unconstructive edits. It's necessary to apply semi-protection for at least a few days, until the crowd disperses, per say. DARTHBOTTO talkcont 05:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get a minimum page protection on this. I tired of someone continually changing stud to spud? Thanks! --MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 22:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Keith Okamoto (talk) 23:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring/disruptive editing IPs. Gizmocorot (talk) 23:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – New apparent sock puppet popping up to repeat the work of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheoDaviesLewis/Archive . Nat Gertler (talk) 23:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes or semi-protection: As a highly visible page describing a recent catastrophic event, this page has been subject to constant disruptive edits that include, but is not limited to, vandalism. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 14:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, too frequently edited, and most of the IP edits are constructive.--Ymblanter (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes or semi-protection We have an IP-hopping editor who repeatedly changes the legal status in the infobox, in spite on consensus on the talk page that the change is incorrect, and refuses to contribute to the discussion. Looie496 (talk) 18:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The Millennials article had to be protected earlier today after an IP editor passed 3RR on it; that same editor is borderline 3RR here as well, having blanked a paragraph they didn't like once, and then rewritten it in the same way four times. Since the editor is frequently changing their IP and cannot be blocked, article protection seems the next option. McGeddon (talk) 20:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Recently, a hoax has been started by fake news website MSMBC that Steve Burns died in a car accident. This is not true, but it has been added to the page repeatedly. Maybe semiprotect this page while the hoax goes around?. Rchard2scout (talk) 21:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since recent unprotection. Player is in excellent form and is attracting high traffic. '''tAD''' (talk) 21:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection reinstatement: after it was removed for the second time, one among the recent WP:SPAs resumed reverting without taking part in the ongoing discussion, like the previous times. LjL (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Keith Okamoto (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent link spamming to krabiinternationalschool.com. Paul_012 (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Persistent edit warring by multiple IPs that are seemingly the same user, as they insist on adding unsourced rumour material. DarkKnight2149 04:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 04:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cdrtools (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection: Several seemingly involved editors edit warring over poor quality sources that don't support the added wordings. Long history of conflict-of-interest edits and non-neutral content from several parties, including the author of the software. We could use some time to discuss proposed changes at the talk page first. Diego (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 01:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please reprotect for a while, like mid month. School that was in the news last week for incident involving the arrest of a student. John from Idegon (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 03:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP disruption. Persistent addition of hoaxes, historical WP:OR, persistent warring] and no responses or reactions upon talk page messags and warnings. Several single purpose IP's operated by one user. [11] - [12] - [13] - [14] - LouisAragon (talk) 03:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes, the IP edits are infrequent.--Ymblanter (talk) 03:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism - Yesterday semi-protection ended and it is already been targeted by IP vandals. Prior to previous semi-protection it was a frequent target of vandalism by IP users. This would be appropriate for a timescale of months as the election ramps up. ShadowDragon343 (talk) 03:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced attempts to change the word Devar to Vanniyar. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 10:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Not a lot of activity, but it's the same unsourced, trivial crap that gets added. I wouldn't mind semi (naturally) but I'm going to review it if the protection granting admin gives it pc. . Sam Sailor Talk! 13:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent copyright violations and promotional content, persisting after most recent protection expired. I think this is from the school's marketing department, and looks like a block evasion using multiple accounts. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 21:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Please see here for background. This is the only article out of the ones mentioned that hasn't been semi'd. There are still BLP violations being added to the page. APK whisper in my ear 22:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 10:20, 2 November, 2015 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

05 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: aka "Kevin Healey Strikes back"; since my last request which I would like to thank you all for, this autism/anti-bullying activist have posted a link for people to vandalize this requested page in his continuing quest to wage a hate campaign with his WP:SPA friends against me by leaving a link in his change.org (see his twitter page) an twitter page, despite saying that he was going to leave it alone, now he thinks "its boring" that he and his socks can't trash his own AfD page. Donnie Park (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP}} User didn't know they were writing on the wrong page. If this persists we can reconsider semi MusikAnimal talk 19:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry I see the AfD is semi'd. Still going to decline for now until further disruption is observed. I've got it on my watchlist MusikAnimal talk 19:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alright, got the full picture (sorry it was obvious to me at first). All things considered I see justification for semi MusikAnimal talk 19:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
...because he left a link encouraging his SPA followers can post there rather than at AfD. Regardless of this but thanks anyway. Donnie Park (talk) 19:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 19:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Main page has been PP also. Wgolf (talk) 21:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 21:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption of SPI page by socks. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The IP in question has already been blocked, no-one else has edited it. GedUK  12:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP problems (blank edit-summaries, refusal to engage at talk page, etc). Thx.Anythingyouwant (talk) 12:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Those aren't really reasons to protect a page. The IP has certainly left plenty of edit summaries, though also not on all edits. The talk page doesn't appear to have totally reached consensus yet either, so there's not a position to enforce using protection. GedUK  13:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll look into dispute resolution. Thx.Anythingyouwant (talk) 13:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP problems (lack of dedicated contribution from experienced Wikipedia members. Relatively high rates of IP edits with inappropriate deletions/insertions and/or incorrect references. Issues with ideologically motivated edits, in other words, a lack of neutrality by IP editors). Thank you for taking time to consider this issue.ScholarBlue (talk) 18:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Doug Weller. MusikAnimal talk 19:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Autobio. APK whisper in my ear 06:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. GedUK  12:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Infrequent but obvious target for years for any young lad wanting to demonstrate his love. Could we at least give it PC?. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. let's see how that goes. GedUK  12:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued high level of IP vandalism. MasterMind5991 (talk) 11:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unregistered editor has contributed heavily to article. Copying a lot from school site which is understandable. I have tried discussing various policies, and protocols with him including WP:POV, WP:BOOSTER, Project Schools, etc. but get no answer. His English is quite good but probably not his first language. Suggest blocking all unregistered users from two days to two weeks. . Student7 (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. There is only one IP editing and those are few. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism for the last six months. Jack | talk page 19:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Repeated recreations after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss International 2016. No reliable sources to convince AfD should be overturned. . The Banner talk 23:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've spent some time looking at this. Miss International 2015 was created in August 2014 (more than a year before) and is going to be held tomorrow. Holding off protecting in case sources emerge for next year's event. NeilN talk to me 04:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism;– Persistent vandalism for the last six months by Fsociety.DavidWestT (talk) 00:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 04:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has been under attack by miscellaneous IPs who ignore the 1RR limit. Request semi for a few weeks. Zerotalk 01:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 02:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Inappropriate IP edits inserting unsourced/poorly sourced/contentious negative material. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NorthBySouthBaranof, you need to be careful with your reverts. Some admins including myself would not consider that a BLP violation. NeilN talk to me 04:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN:, it is unquestionably a BLP violation. The edit intentionally misrepresents the sources, because the sources do not say "King says" his racial heritage is something, they state it as fact in the source's voice. It is not a POV to be attributed, it is a sourced statement of fact. Misrepresenting the sources to weaken the sources' statement of the fact of his racial heritage is clearly is intended to depict the subject in a negative light re: the long-ago discredited and dropped claims that King was lying about his race. Intentional misrepresentation of reliable sources to depict a living person negatively is the very root of what the BLP policy is meant to protect against. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:44, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Seconding that it is a BLP issue. Also I would question to applicability of the currently used template. Please replace with something more neutral. Artw (talk) 04:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Further discussion here: User_talk:NeilN#Shaun_King_.28activist.29 Both the protection and template are appropriate. --NeilN talk to me 05:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to two week semi. --NeilN talk to me 05:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yes it has, bot. NeilN talk to me 05:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. APK whisper in my ear 05:48, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive and unsourced edits from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 20:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

fully protected: High level of IP vandalism after previous semi-protection expired. Content has been repeatedly deleted and unsourced content simultaneously added in its place, apparently as a personal grudge against one or more parties mentioned in the article. The replaced content contradicts verified sources and other material in the article. Miimno (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Supdiop (T🔹C) 23:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 23:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:47, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruption to page under construction by IP's with addition of original research not supported by reliable sources. livelikemusic my talk page! 01:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:48, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is being subjected persistent vandalism. jojo@nthony (talk) 05:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Maintenance tags keep being removed for no apparent reason. Adam9007 (talk) 15:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done A valid enough request, but upon reviewing the situation it was clear it could just be deleted, which I have done. `Beeblebrox (talk) 21:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Six months? Maybe it will be notable by then and a non-COI person will create it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 01:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. The creations have spanned over six months NeilN talk to me 04:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; Bureaucrat page. Jmenard-cc (talk) 01:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism in the past 24 hours. APK whisper in my ear 21:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism/disruptive editing.--JayJasper (talk) 21:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs edit warring. Debresser (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06 November 2015

Semi-protection: Recent spike of IP vandalism. Samsara 00:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent spike of IP vandalism. somebody vandalises article please protect if from editing. Aliluyeva (talk) 09:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected MusikAnimal talk 20:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 19:59, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 17:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 20:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from unregistered users. RenRen070193 02:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Done AlDub and Maine Mendoza semied one month. NeilN talk to me 15:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: – Second time requesting this within a week, having had my first request denied a few days ago. An IP continues to revert my edits, leaving uncivil edit summaries, and falsely labelling them as vandalism. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To force discussion NeilN talk to me 15:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Persistent moving. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 15:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the page was unprotected on 17 Oct, it's been one IP edit after another that's had to be reverted. — Maile (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Nflfantasytest (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. No obvious vandalism since then. Samsara 10:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is Page of Dyan Castillejo are got them for some Place of Long Term Pokémon Vandal by anon IP - 112.198.90.235 (talk) 06:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP user blocked by Materialscientist. Samsara 10:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent influx of IP vandalism this morning. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection request by OTRS: Please refer to OTRS ticket #2015110410001335. I will ask for unprotection as soon as the matter is resolved. Asav | Talk 15:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asav, you're going to have to expand a bit (if you can) as most admins don't have OTRS access. I've looked at the article and reverted the BLP violation made by what I'm assuming is the subject of the article. Is the reverted version the one that needs protecting? --NeilN talk to me 15:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but OTRS correspondence is confidential. I'm certainly aware of your dilemma, and have asked an admin with OTRS access to review the ticket. I'm asking to have this version protected. Asav | Talk 17:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Being looked at elsewhere NeilN talk to me 05:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Schoolchildren must be covering the American Colonial/Revolutionary War period in their history classes - recent spate of persistent vandalism from various sources. Shearonink (talk) 22:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been subject to repeated removal of sourced content without explanation by IPs. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 04:59, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 05:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Full-protection: Per WP:Deceased_Wikipedians/Guidelines#On_the_userpage. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) WER 00:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected by Titodutta. tutterMouse (talk) 06:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by anonymous users. Thechased (talk) 03:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Allegedly, one of the Duggars had a baby today - IPs are repeatedly adding that bit of content but without a source or are adding it with unreliable sources. -- WV 04:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cahk (talk) 01:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over 4 days. Accurizer (talk) 02:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 02:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: User request. cyrfaw (talk) 13:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected NeilN talk to me 14:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently under mass attack. Widr (talk) 21:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 164.116.142.16/28 blocked a week. They've attacked other articles - need to do some cleanup. NeilN talk to me 21:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Extended to 3 months to match Gilliam's blocks of some individual IPs in this range. --NeilN talk to me 21:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Lowercase version of Champak bora is also PP. Wgolf (talk) 21:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected, both versions. Bishonen | talk 21:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No longer needed now that the PlayStation 4 is out. Rigsofrods (talk) 00:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked Mr. Stradivarius? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have a feeling that it would still suffer from vandalism even though we also have the PlayStation 4 now. But I suppose we could try unprotecting it for a little while to see if it still needs the protection. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected GedUK  13:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07 November 2015

Semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring, high level of persistent Sockpuppet and IP vandalism, discriminatory behavior towards certain segments of the ethnic group (please see talk page and history log). Vdr11 (talk) 19:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editor note: Reporting user seems to be POV pushing. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Editor note: I think @Mlpearc: is getting very a head of himself. Please do not refer to me as engaging in POV-pushing. Perhaps you should review the policy yourself, POV pushing "does not apply to talk page discussions" which is where I was pushing my POV. "Calling someone a "POV-pusher" is uncivil and pejorative", especially as I have made it clear that discrimination is occurring consistently which was why I was reverting changes. Thank you and have a nice day. Vdr11 (talk) 21:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing edit war/dispute. samtar {t} 19:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gabe Almeida

Indefinite create protection: Repeated negative BLPs. Originally at Gabe Almeida and Gabe almeida. User claims he will create others. clpo13(talk) 19:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 19:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. APK whisper in my ear 09:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @AgnosticPreachersKid: Although I have blocked the IP for making legal threats, this is obviously not vandalism. They have used the talk page and are protesting the restoration of unsourced and poorly sourced material. NeilN talk to me 11:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - part of the Chitral and Pashtun caste/tribe dispute and claims it is in Afghanistan - Named accounts blocked, now using dynamic IPs - Arjayay (talk) 14:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 2 months, PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 16:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only registered users can edit . ChuckNoll vs Vince Lombardi 16:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected Only semi; full protection would mean only admins could edit. GedUK  17:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs adding unsourced criminal accusations and nonsense. Nat Gertler (talk) 16:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 1 week, PC 2 months. NeilN talk to me 16:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pending changes isn't helping prevent ongoing additions of original research. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Continuous unsourced value changes. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent insistence that two men should be listed because of described circumstance rather than because the sources support the term "autodidact" or the concept of being self-taught. Binksternet (talk) 04:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continuous vandalism and unnecessary edits, particularly to the plot and cast sections. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 08:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Anon doing battleground over content disptue. SlightSmile 01:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 01:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by user and IPs from Indonesia as can be seen on the page history. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 04:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Will Smith Monica (talk · contribs) and 1.152.96.170 (talk · contribs) are the same person vandalizing articles (changing dates and other "minor" acts), including the article I'm requesting be semi'd. APK whisper in my ear 06:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The IP has been blocked and the other account has stopped, so this may be a moot point. APK whisper in my ear 07:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done: Closing as protection no longer required. Deryck C. 09:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chamith (talk) 07:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Eponymous editor has been spraying this rubbish everywhere he can. We've had it as a draft, a sandbox, on his user page and it seems to keep popping back up. . Fiddle Faddle 08:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mike Rosoft. Euryalus (talk) 09:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of inaccurate anon edits that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 21:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sorry to bug you, but there is an ip editor who is currently trying to insert some pretty trivial information. He's canvassed outside WP to get SPA editors to comment on the article (which none of them have ever edited prior to today). It's wasting both my time and the time of another editor (who I think may be an admin), who have this page on our watchlists. Onel5969 TT me 21:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 22:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Lots of unregistered and newly registered users adding unsourced and very poorly sourced reports of this person's alleged death. —Granger (talk · contribs) 02:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article was created, with a notability tag placed on it. It has since been determined the article is not notable, and redirect to an appropriate place. However, users keep undoing the "blanking" and fail to add any content to make the article notable. Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:29, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. per above MusikAnimal talk 20:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An ip-hopper has been edit warring over the same wording for some time. Temporary semi protection for a week may encourage him to move on.   — Jess· Δ 05:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What vandalism? I dispute that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B066:FAA4:15B8:C210:2893:8B18 (talk) 06:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalism is incorrect. I clicked the wrong button when filing the report. The summary I wrote after is correct.   — Jess· Δ 10:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like discussion was only started after the most recent set of reverts. No further activity in several hours now. Samsara 10:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above MusikAnimal talk 20:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone keeps messing with the DOB. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 09:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@EauZenCashHaveIt: What's the source for the current birth date? --NeilN talk to me 14:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: That is not the point, although I have gone ahead and removed it altogether. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 19:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@EauZenCashHaveIt: Well that is kind of the point as the reason for protection would be the changing between equally unsourced DOBs. --NeilN talk to me 19:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Removing the DOB should stop the edit warring. NeilN talk to me 19:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant genre changes. The IP addresses do nothing but just keep vandalizing or changing genres to the page and lying about it being a "typo" in the edit summary. . Second Skin (talk) 22:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I sometimes wonder if we should avoid declaring genres. It just seems to be a major point of contention on so many articles... Samsara 22:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page was locked 3.5 years ago. Carrie just released a new album so the page needs to be unlocked. The editor who locked it has locked their talk page so I cannot write them. WTF ? One can lock their discussion page, so how are we to discuss? 173.66.63.102 (talk) 09:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Courcelles: Samsara 09:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Samsara. Courcelles posted that he she it is on break. So how else does the page get unlocked? 173.66.63.102 (talk) 10:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected I've unprotected in good faith given the wikibreak of the protecting admin (on their user talk - [15] [16]). Will keep an eye on the article. As usual, please source all your changes per WP:BLP, WP:RS etc. Thanks. Samsara 10:32, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Because of a particularly disruptive IP (not only on this article). Alex2006 (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 17:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP-vandalism. Jeppiz (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. MusikAnimal talk 22:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been evidence on the page history about persistent vandalism by IP addresses and new users whose main aim is to vandalise the page. Some have even made slanderous edits. Aha... (talk) 19:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 19:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for effecting the protection Biblioworm. Aha... (talk) 19:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection, or at least PC protection. This article used to be quite stable, but this individual is currently highly visible in the media, has apparently complained about factual inaccuracies in the article,[17] and there is now a long series of reverts surrounding these facts, in addition to an increase in vandalism. I think a period of protection will help straighten the article out. I'd rather not do it myself, otherwise I would. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Dynamic IP keeps inserting chunk of nonsense. Jeppiz (talk) 20:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 20:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: I'm not sure why, but it looks like more than one IP have been going after this BLP article – for example: diff. I can't revert again, or I'll be getting close to edit warring. But I think temporary semi'ing this one may be in order. --IJBall (contribstalk) 17:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Biblioworm 17:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous long-term vandalism, disruptive editing and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users. Page has already been protected 14 times in three years. 81.129.158.95 (talk) 18:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. --Biblioworm 19:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Telsa

Permanent full protection as this user is believed to be deceased. See this diff at ANI. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. I protected the user page, but not the talk page, since I believe the talk page should be left open so that people can add condolences, if they wish. Biblioworm 20:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 21:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done NeilN talk to me 16:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stewartvinrese and its archives for more. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remove create-protection: Template /sandbox pages generally should not be protected. Alternatively, if IP-sock-abuse is still an issue create the page and semi-protect it. I would like to play around with some versions that have a different color, in case the deletion discussion for the main template results in "keep". Note that the template itself is currently semi-protected and I am not asking for that to change. Protecting admin DoRD last edited in October so I'm requesting the change here. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected--Ymblanter (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs from Durham or educational networks based there continuing to promote ideas by a Duke University (in Durham) IT worker, Manuel Rosa - recent additions are original research - IPs keep changing and rarely discuss . Doug Weller (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect – Incessant disruptive IP edits. This page has been semi-protected longterm in the past for the same reason. In fact, we've been blocking this guy since 2006 [18] Bretonbanquet (talk) 14:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism by IPs . Cheetah255 (talk) 15:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dismas|(talk) 15:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is being vandalised again, happened twice today. jojo@nthony (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protect: IP edit warring with numerous people. Requests to discuss on article talk page go unheeded. Kingsindian  03:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 03:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@NeilN: User seems to have returned with a different IP, making the same edit. Kingsindian  04:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Admins working before the advent of smartphones had it much, much easier. NeilN talk to me 04:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Including BLP issues. Doug Weller (talk) 07:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – by multiple sockpuppets of User:AKACHUBEAR. Zanhe (talk) 07:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., all socks are on their way to be indefblocked--Ymblanter (talk) 13:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Human3015TALK  09:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High visibility page - target for spam. Request temporary protection until 12/November. . KH-1 (talk) 12:41, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war over use of the term "American football" throughout the article. Multiple reverts over the past couple of days. clpo13(talk) 18:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I notice that the article has been semi-protected since 2010. That will not automatically restore when the full expires. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IP addresses. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. NeilN talk to me 03:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Can be un-SALTed if needed. JMHamo (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism today, several different IPs. Jeppiz (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 02:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  TOW  14:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IPs, V4 v6 adding false info. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Balkan history articles

Temporary semi-protection: Same as Stephen Tomašević of Bosnia (above). Persistent vandalism by a delusional and indefinitely blocked sock-puppeteer, Bosnipedian. Surtsicna (talk) 21:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Only for registered users can edit. ChuckNoll vs Vince Lombardi 19:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Declined ChuckNoll vs Vince Lombardi please read our protection policy and also fix your signature. It needs a link to your user or talk page. NeilN talk to me 20:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 21:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unregistered IPs, adding false information that has the intention of vandalizing the article by somehow relating a fake LGBT group to the club and trying to generate homophobia with it. IPs usually don't add good information for the article and due to this page being from one of the biggest clubs in Brazil, it seems prudent to keep updates only to registered users. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 1 week, PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 23:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Same shifting-IP editor that was warned about and broke 3RR over at Millennials has now reverted three editors here. McGeddon (talk) 18:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 20:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need edit semi-protection due to edit-warring IP-hopping editor. McDoobAU93 19:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protecting purely to cool things down, but this looks to me like a legitimate content dispute / edit war MusikAnimal talk 20:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. - HafizHanif (talk) 20:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. NeilN talk to me 21:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 15:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 15:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article is being flooded with coverage of a single event related to the subjects resignation. JCO312 (talk) 16:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Or a pending changes protection would also be good. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sam Sailor Talk! 13:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 14:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This GA appears to be a vandal magnet and needs semi-protection. Having to consistently revert vandals is wearing us out. . Atsme📞📧 14:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - only one IP active in last few weeks - report them at WP:AIV if they continue. AlexiusHoratius 14:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP-hopper repeatedly giving undue prominence to a fringe view on mediaeval universities. A view very far away from the mainstream. Thomas.W talk 17:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Higher level of IP vandalism.--RenRen070193 09:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continuous addition of BLP violations without sources. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 16:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, lengthy protection log. Traffic for this must-have game is likely to be high during the Christmas season '''tAD''' (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PC for a monh or two. This has been a long slow removal of maintenance templates. At first I thought it was good faith but misguided. However, they now make edits like, this. It was recently semi for a week but as soon as it expired they were bak. PC would be great. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 15:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 15:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Active IP-vandalism today. Jeppiz (talk) 16:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by user using multiple IPs. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 10:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seemingly a target of a sock: For example, Special:Contributions/166.177.187.161. Stickee (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of the page following the compltion of the 2015 season yesterday. IPs and new users are constantly changing the result in the table and protecting the page for a week should allow this to pass. NapHit (talk) 13:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – this recreating likely from the first article TV5Ozamiz instead with indenfinite Kean Rabuyo's article. Oripaypaykim (talk) 13:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 14:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant disruptive editing. Possible target from vandals, as seen in the page history. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant IP vandalism and ignoring of given reliable sources and editor notes. - adamstom97 (talk) 07:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection : The edits here have a substansial IP vandalism. Please check [19] , [20] and [21]. Nonsensical info added though not needed! D'SuperHero (talk) 12:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the edits are infrequent, let us try pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page has been repeatedly targeted by Maelbros IP socks. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page has been repeatedly targeted by Maelbros IP socks. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – dynamic IPv6 adding unreferenced, likely bogus info. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article has been repeatedly vandalized by the IP-hopping "Pokemon vandal" since November 5. -WayKurat (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: a registered editor has persisted in making edits that cite a 2012 article for statements added about data analysis conducted from 2013 onward, thus muddying the page. I've tried three times to engage the editor through talk pages to discuss the fact that, while the statement is likely correct, "likely" doesn't work for Wikipedia and we need a source cited that supports the statement (and we can't cite a 2012 article to make statements about data analysis conducted the year after it was published). Since the editor seems to resist discussion of the issue, I can only recommend that the page be locked to prevent further disruption. I'm open to other solutions as well. ComicsAreJustAllRight (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Additions of original research. Has previously been semi-protected for up to three months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP article being ambushed with vandalism, following his actions in the Broncos/Colts game. DPH1110 (talk) 06:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous recreation of redirected content which previously had AFD consensus. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 19:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy - This is Dyan Castillejo Page are got them for Place of Long Term Pokémon Vandal - 112.198.77.129 (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: additional request to that of Jorge Lorenzo above as these are being as much vandalized for the same reason. Donnie Park (talk) 01:00, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Previous semi-protection was for three months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Although the tour already ended, fans repeatedly want to add fake dates and 'extend' it to 2016 and also changing revenue numbers. They've been already warned, however, they persist. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP has been showing ownership over NOW articles, and continues to edit even after multiple warnings. ilovechristianmusic (Tell Me Something!) 18:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An editor appears to be making numerous unhelpful edits without logging in; either partial protection or pending changes might be helpful. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, almost every pending change that needs reviewing is vandalism. The1337gamer (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 00:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It is pretty obvious from reading the news that Mr. Lorenzo is not going to be flavour of the month considering the number of vandalism coming into his page. Donnie Park (talk) 00:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increase protection to semi; IP vandals have been targeting this page. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 19:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Since the vandalism seems to be mostly by one IP, I've blocked it for 72 hours. Biblioworm 19:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The page has been a target of Jericho900's sockpuppets. Israel's Son 22:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I've gone for indefinite, since it seems to have been a target for many months now. Biblioworm 23:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – May also be sockpuppetry by User:Janagewen. clpo13(talk) 22:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 23:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Chrisnemelka (talk · contribs) blocked by Hut 8.5. Biblioworm 18:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden bout of vandalism this month. I don't have any context as to what caused this but I do know that when I got here the population was listed as -21 and the article had said that for nearly a week.  — TORTOISEWRATH 18:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Biblioworm 18:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit warring. A few IP users have been engaging in agenda-driven vandalism and removing sourced content. Musashiaharon (talk) 22:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 22:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10 November 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unsourced changes after previous protection expired. — AYTK talk. 19:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent influx of IP vandalism. Wildthing61476 (talk) 20:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:22, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@MusikAnimal: Vandalism started in September, which is why I suggested three months' sprot for now. Samsara 20:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! Protection conflict :) I like to start off low and work my way up, but you were there first, so I've restored it to your chosen expiry. I help maintain Twinkle, and will see if I can make it catch conflicts like this MusikAnimal talk 20:42, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP keeps vandalizing various NOW music album articles, even after being explained to, and being warned. ilovechristianmusic (Tell Me Something!) 21:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Constant copyright material being added/vandalism. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 15:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 15:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing by removal of sourced content and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users for the past month. 81.129.158.95 (talk) 17:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 20:23, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2 weeks. 28 changes by 13 users ([22]) Only one was constructive. For a low traffic page, it gets vandalized a lot. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous shorter semi-protection. Samsara 18:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 19:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I'm tired of seeing vandalism in my watchlist Incendiary Iconoclasm 15:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sadly, not much going on other than vandalism and rvvs since about July. Samsara 16:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The third protection in quick succession (see protection log) expired a few days ago, and the same IP-hopper in Dubai is right back at it again, just like after previous short-time protections. A longer protection is requested this time since shorter protections aren't effective, and it's not a simple content dispute but fringe-pushing, an IP-hopper who is repeatedly adding material that is far away from the mainstream opinion. Thomas.W talk 16:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Block evasion by User:Barrellmaker, using a sock account (User:Veritas Victor) and IP 188.222.104.218. Binksternet (talk) 18:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Block evasion by User:Barrellmaker, using a sock account (User:Veritas Victor) and IP 188.222.104.218. Binksternet (talk) 18:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Palestine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    As of October 10th, 11:57 (UTC), the edits below have been made by various IPs and reverted. There has only been a single IP edit that has not been reverted during this time. This seems to be an ongoing issue, so I would like to ask for indefinite semi-protection or pending-change protection, but happy to have a "trial period" to see if this will benefit the page in the long-term.
  1. IP edit reverted: 22:03, 10 November 2015
  2. IP edit reverted: 06:14, 10 November 2015
  3. IP edit reverted: 20:28, 9 November 2015
  4. IP edit reverted: 08:06, 2 November 2015
  5. IP edit reverted: 19:52, 5 November 2015
  6. IP edit reverted: 13:06, 5 November 2015
Cheers, Drcrazy102 (talk) 12:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I'm tired of seeing vandalism in my watchlist Incendiary Iconoclasm 15:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term vandalism from various IPs adding rowspans. Ebyabe talk - Border Town01:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – He's reportedly fallen into a coma with "catastrophic organ failure".[23] An IP just changed his status to deceased without confirmation, so big BLP issue developing. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't think a single unsourced edit is enough to justify protection. Feel free to re-add the article here if the unsourced additions continue. Biblioworm 05:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: This is a sports event that will be held on Sunday 15th (i.e. this weekend) in Melbourne, Australia. The time difference means it will commence when it is still Saturday 14th in the United States. Therefore, there has been consistent changing of the dates, despite there being an explanation in the article and several comments in the code. The changing of the dates is bound to continue for at least the rest of this week and probably most of next week also, so I am requesting temporary protection for 10 days (until five days after the event has finished). AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Try that as I see there are some good IP edits. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  07:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I've actually decided to protect it indefinitely; it's been semi-protected for long durations in the past, but it still continues to be a common target for vandalism. Anyone who disagrees can leave a message on my talk page. Biblioworm 07:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Slow edit war between two IPs. One wants date of birth as 1987. Other wants date of birth as 1991. One Year till the dispute is over. The Avengers (talk) 09:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slow enough fro PC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Richard Harvey (talk) 09:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Another one slow enough for PC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper geolocating to Albania repeatedly increasing the number of aircraft etc in order to make the Albanian Air Force seem stronger than they are (numbers that are not in any way supported by the references). Thomas.W talk 09:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP changing stats without reason . Vin09 (talk) 03:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 05:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The edit warring continued immediately upon the expiration of the previous protection. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:23, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 05:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Of 50 edits in the last ~55 days, only 2 have been constructive (a typo correction and conversion of ‘http:’ addresses to ‘https:’); all others have been vandalism and reversions, with almost half of all edits and more than half of the vandalism coming from IP users). Wikierroneous 05:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 05:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "someone" is peeking on this article, with high frequency vandalisms from different IPs. SzMithrandir (talk) 23:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 60 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! (with my new signature) -- SzMithrandirEred Luin 04:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism and disruptive editing. '''tAD''' (talk) 02:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 03:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  15:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Musa, where's the recent vandalism? --NeilN talk to me 15:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman 23:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A WP:SPA IP user persistently edits the article by infringing on many WP policies&guidelines like WP:OR etc. and deteriorates the quality. Please also roll-back to this latest stable version: [24] Logos (talk) 20:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have not committed any of the described acts. --192.222.158.210 (talk) 23:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the above user is attempting to justify unexplained content removal. I have left the appropriate warning on his/her page. I have as well initiated a discussion about the content on the talk page, although such is not required in this case. --192.222.158.210 (talk) 23:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. User not IP hopping and previous set of edits was 15 October, so not high frequency. Samsara 23:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Additional comment due to edit conflict: please avoid aggravating each other - instead find common ground and resolve the differences, if necessary as suggested above via DR. Samsara 23:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection would provide this user enough time to cultivate some key wp policies & guidelines. He has no idea, but plenty of boldness. Logos (talk) 07:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Someone related to this BLP has constantly edited this article under new accounts and adding unsourced crap everytime[25][26][27], The editing isn't a constant thing but hopefully if for either indef or a longer time It would stamp the sockpuppetry/coi editing out, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 23:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 6 months, PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 02:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thanks Neil :) –Davey2010Talk 03:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Last vandalism was a few weeks ago. George Ho (talk) 23:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Biblioworm 23:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article can't go more than a few days without vandalism, and there haven't been substantial contributions in the past month[28]. –Sparkgap (talk) 02:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Template used in every WP:FFD nomination, and also used in Twinkle. Edits to this template have the possibility of creating several issues if not done right. Steel1943 (talk) 03:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely as high risk. Samsara 03:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism: since page protection was removed on the 2nd, page has been vandalized by IP vandals almost every day, most of whom appear to be the same anonymous vandal insisting on inserting in and edit-warring to protect original research nonsense.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 00:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Administrator still grieving; protection going to expire in a few days. --George Ho (talk) 00:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – + frequent vandalism. Denniss (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:40, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It would appear the subject of this article directed his fans to add something quite unencyclopedic to his bio. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing resumed after protection expired. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 18:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last 25 or so edits have only been vandalism/vandalism reverting dating back to only the last week or so. A month protection was applied in April-May 2015 so perhaps a month or two here would help push away some of these IP vandals. Gloss 22:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 22:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article is under attack of several sockpuppet-vandals (see: [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], all in the last 24 hours). Vanjagenije (talk) 23:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 23:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. VQuakr (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page seems to be vandalised by IPs on average about once a month, sometimes more often. I think it is likely to continue to attract vandalism (by those offended by this book) into the indefinite future. Given that, I think semi-protecting the page would be wise, and reduce the workload on other editors who have to clean up the mess afterwards. (And I've noticed, some minor errors had crept into the article, due to mistakes made in fixing vandalism.) SJK (talk) 21:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I think whatever is done here, it needs to be indefinite/permanent not just for a few weeks or months. If you don't feel indefinite semi-protection is appropriate, can we do indefinite Pending changes protection instead? SJK (talk) 21:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Biblioworm 22:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This user has been banned from Wikimedia projects, and now several IPs are leaving harassing messages on his Talk Page. See here for more information. Andrew327 21:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 21:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 22:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11 November 2015

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism and sock puppetry. Currently a bunch of different IPs and users have vandelized the page and have had their edits reverted. ipadguy (talk) 9:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent disruption since last 6-month semi expired in May MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you from ipadguy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ipadguy (talkcontribs) 18:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – After the main account was indeffed here, IPs have shown up to make the same edit. Note that none of these users have joined talk page discussion. Requesting long term semi as this has been going on for months. NeilN talk to me 18:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doesn't look like you're involved, if that was a concern :) MusikAnimal talk 18:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@MusikAnimal: It was, since I participated in the content discussions. Yuna seems to have legions of devoted fans so I couldn't say for sure if this was block evasion or just other fans picking up the baton. Figured I'd let someone else decide what to do :-) --NeilN talk to me 18:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection My talk page was semi'd indef a month ago due to IP pestering. I'd like to unprotect and see if it's manageable now. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Biblioworm 21:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The first entry on this dab page makes it a vandal-magnet: nothing significant will be lost if IP editors can't edit this (otherwise very stable) page, and time of other editors will be saved. PamD 16:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in vandalism from unconfirmed accounts. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, including replacing the entire text. oknazevad (talk) 17:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last month, I requested indefinite pending changes protection to this page, which was granted since the vandalism on this page started again after it was in pending changes protection for a year. At this point, and looking at the recent edits, I don't think that non-confirmed editors are providing any non-vandalism edits anymore. Thus, I am now requesting indefinite semi-protection. (Note to answering admin; if granting this request means that the new level of protection will eventually expire, just decline this request: expiring protections have not worked for this page at any point in the last two years.). Steel1943 (talk) 06:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's only been one period of semi in the past and it was only for 10 days. We should try shorter periods before indef'ing. It's simply the philosophy. We can always re-protect if needed MusikAnimal talk 18:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Multiple IP addresses removing the infobox image with no reason given, as well as one sockpuppet created in order to replace it with an image lifted from the internet (which has since been deleted for a copyvio). Peacock-and-snake (talk) 09:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Peacock-and-snake, please discuss with the user. It's a single IP so they should get the message. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, kelapstick, thanks for your reply. However, I'm a bit confused as to why you only mentioned one IP. So far, 213.130.115.162, 94.200.20.251 and 94.200.20.179 (who is, indeed, responsible for most of the edits) have all been involved. There is also the newly created Enterthevoid8888 who made exactly one edit, the removal, and hasn't been active since. It's the 5th time it's been removed in roughly 2 weeks, using 3 different sources (if you count 94.200.20.251 and 94.200.20.179 as being the same). I've also asked them repeatedly to at least provide a reason for removal, which they have so far failed to do. I don't think I'm being unreasoanble when I see this as disruptive but if you think that I'd best engage with them directly for the time being, I'll do so. Peacock-and-snake (talk) 12:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am looking at the last week. --kelapstick(bainuu) 13:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: At least two IPs persistently adding atrociously sourced, sexually demeaning content to this BLP. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, Some IPs are changing his ethnicity continuously. Need protection for couple of days. Ferakp (talk) 01:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing, lots of recnt activity. Murry1975 (talk) 12:54, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Six Months. Galaxy Kid (talk) 12:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Deepawali1983 (talk · contribs) blocked by MusikAnimal. Samsara 14:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One year. Galaxy Kid (talk) 12:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Six months. this and this. Galaxy Kid (talk) 12:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If that doesn't take care of it, pending changes may be a good option for this article. Samsara 15:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  10:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained content removal by a couple of IPs over the last three days. samtar {t} 11:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Ymblanter - I see you may have forgotten to tag {{pp-vandalism}} so I've done that, is that okay? samtar {t} 11:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure it is ok. I thought bots eventually do that.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm almost certain they do.. in truth, I wanted to see what the option in TW did! samtar {t} 11:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  11:41, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – It seems that a few IPs have been canvassing Wikipedia pages, including this one, and adding unwanted links to Invmail under the See Also or External Links sections despite numerous talkpage warnings and reverts by other editors pursuant to WP:EL and other policies. This appears to be a recurring thing now and I would reccomend a short semiprotect as IP hopping is being used. These links have also been added to Hushmail, Lavabit, and ASmallWorld.

Diffs: [39] [40] [41]. BlAcKhAt9(9 (talk) 00:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Kids are causing trouble again... Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 01:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: {{brk}} is a shortcut (redirect) to {{break}} which is a highly visible template that is already fully protected. I have added a shortcut to the template {{break}} via a template redirect called {{brk}}. Please "fully protect" the {{brk}} template redirect (shortcut). Thank you. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 08:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:50, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most likely my request would be rejected. This page will face vandalism again: as compared to other young Bollywood actresses Sonakshi Sinha has extra weight. . Galaxy Kid (talk) 09:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the revision history of last two years and tell me how many times vandalism was reverted. Galaxy Kid (talk) 09:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism from IP and new editors. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 09:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:54, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Land Before Time movies

Temporary semi-protection: IPs are repeatedly inserting the same edits that a user has already been blocked for twice. Meters (talk) 23:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and user reblocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:54, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the comments on my talk Mlpearc (open channel) 02:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Socks blocked. NeilN talk to me 04:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Between the recent edits on this article, File:Jeff dye cropped.JPG, File:Jeff Dye.jpg and File:Jeff-dye-2015.jpg, I'm suspecting some sort of meatpuppetry. Unfortunately, it seems as though the "meatpuppet editors" have figured out how to get autoconfirmed status as the article is currently semi-protected. Steel1943 (talk) 04:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I'm watching it and will protect further when they escalate. So far they clearly violate fair-use guidelines, and thus may be reverted. If they come up with a licensed image - fine. Materialscientist (talk) 04:41, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A leaked or possibly pirated version of an upcoming album by this subject has been posted to a European social media site. Editors continue to add content to repeatedly, and one created an article for it, which had to be deleted (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invincible (Deuce album). To prevent the addition of this copyright violation, protection should be to prevent new editors and anons from editing. The last protection was for a week (I believe), please protect for three weeks (or longer). Something should come to light within that time. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Walter Görlitz, let's try this. If there's too much reverting please let me know. NeilN talk to me 05:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deal! Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection requested. A constant disruptive editing by IP, not agreeing to abide page discussion consensus. Temporal semi-protection for 2 weeks and for 2 months provided only a temporal relief.GreyShark (dibra) 17:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Apparently under perennial discussion, with some support for both sides. Samsara 18:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes does not work. IP's are here just to vandalize. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Block could have been appropriate earlier in the day, but IP looks stale now. Samsara 21:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks started edit-warring almost to the minute previous protection expired. Dr. K. 22:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 23:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs adding unsourced material after warnings. A couple of days protection would help. Ebyabe talk - Health and Welfare22:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 23:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Is this mostly an issue with 100.36.126.123? If so, I'd suggest issuing escalated warnings to the user and report at WP:AIV if it persists. —Bagumba (talk) 20:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Please revert the "protection downgrade" from permanent protection template protection. This page is cascade-protected; a cascade-protected page with template protection creates a misleading "edit" option on the page when no one (except admins) can actually edit it. Steel1943 (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 19:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No significant vandalism/edit warring in over 2 years. Sıgehelmus (Talk) |д=) 15:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel J. Leivick: Are you active? Samsara 18:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Protecting admin last edited in July. Replaced the indef semi with 1 month pending protection that will ease into unprotection. NeilN talk to me 19:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 19:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 19:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, removal of sourced contents and addition of unsourced contents by an user account dedicated for promotional purposes only. MahenSingha (Talk) 10:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm not seeing vandalism here. I do see persistent editing by users (possibly SPA?), but I don't think protection is needed at this time. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 10:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Edit Warring. 169.230.155.123 (talk) 10:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Absolutely not necessary. No edits to constitute vandalism, or even the need to consider protection here. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 10:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., apparently, wrong page--Ymblanter (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One year. Long Time edit warring by IPs. . Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a debate between two IP users about her powers. --Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For whatever reason, this page is facing long time vandalism. Check the protection log. Indefinite is the only solution. . Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. I think semi is a bit too much, but pending changes seems reasonable. At the very least, the vandalism won't be visible to general readers if it isn't approved (and of course, no good reviewer approves vandalism). Biblioworm 17:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The "Rick Carlson" edits resumed immediately after the previous page protection expired. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ccdude93/Archive. The IP addresses are usually not consistent enough for a block to be effective. EricEnfermero (Talk) 17:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit longer than earlier semi-protection. Samsara 17:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chance to re-evaluate the problem without changes being visible to the public. Samsara 17:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One month. Same IP user is coming back to express his love for the actress. The language is not in perfect English. . Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent release of immensely popular actor. The article is already being damaged by his lovers/haters. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:54, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – I have already protected this page because the unsourced death contributions were happening now. However, I'm asking for an admin to review my protection because I used to work for Samsung and I know Lee Kun-Hee's family so I have a conflict of interest. No reliable news source is confirming his death and the page has only just come off protection from the same rumours being added a few months ago. . 5 albert square (talk) 14:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator 5 albert square. Good call - I'd say that was the most conservative thing possible given the situation. If it persists upon expiry, I would endorse putting it on pc-indef. And if PC alone doesn't cut it, don't hesitate to add semi for a few weeks. Samsara 16:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Claims of death, but no one has any sources to confirm. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kudpung. Samsara 16:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Marston (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Recent death - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see little to no vandalism right now. NeilN talk to me 05:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection - increased edit-warring by IPs over the past several days.GreyShark (dibra) 13:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar. Samsara 15:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruption. IPs constantly add unsupported sales figures as well as chart peaks.--Harout72 (talk) 13:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – apparently its silly season. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 15:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done kelapstick(bainuu) 15:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistant vandalism. There is no constructive editing from the IPs, and most of the history is only reverting. (And please do not say the default comments!) 115.188.191.246 (talk) 00:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. (The bot which archives requests needs the default templates so that it knows the request has been answered). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it's just I did not want the "not enough disruptive activity to justify protection", "pages are not protected pre-emptively" comments. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 09:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Those comments mentioned at the top are the comments I did not want because they are vague because they do not explain why. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 09:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and edit-warring. Ebyabe talk - General Health08:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remove pending changes protection: The vandalism was minimal and occurred over 20 months ago. This article is lightly edited and well-watched. Posted request two weeks ago on the talk page of the admin who placed protection. [42] No reason given for continued protection. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F05D:49AD:7B3C:978C (talk) 03:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: From the article's edit history, it seems that there were some reverted edits from an anonymous editors in June and July of this year, and October of last year. Also, this request seems more like an attempt to bypass protection based on a content inclusion dispute; see the last two sections on Talk:Bowhunting. Steel1943 (talk) 06:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the last sentence - that's incorrect. The disputed text was agreed upon and added weeks ago. As for the rest, a few instances of revertable text do not justify indefinite protection, especially on a non-BLP article. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F05D:49AD:7B3C:978C (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected I don't see why the PC protection should be removed. It's the least restrictive form of protection we have, the protecting admin has not given permission to unprotect, and the recent dispute doesn't convince me at all the unprotecting would be in the best interests of the article. --Biblioworm 20:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The protecting admin has not even responded to the request. Protection is not intended to prevent routine editing disputes, as happened recently. The protection had no impact on that dispute, though note that the protecting admin was a part of that dispute. Protection is not intended to prevent routine editing disputes. The reasons for pending changes protection, per WP:PCPP, are: persistent vandalism, violations of the biographies of living persons policy, and copyright violations. "Persistent vandalism" doesn't mean a few times a year. Indefinite protection is entirely inappropriate for this article and is a violation of the clear policy language. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F05D:49AD:7B3C:978C (talk) 22:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The film's immense popularity means that the article has been severely vandalised, with most vandals going unnoticed. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 24 of the 25 IP edits in the past five months have been vandalism. These edits (and their reverts) have constituted almost all editing to this article in this period. Psychonaut (talk) 07:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – It's a promotional article, repeatedly recreated by it's author. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:51, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The semi-protected edit requests to the talk page are at least as disruptive as the trolling. Please remove the protection to stop the disruptive edit requests. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it better to have trolling on the less-visible talk page rather than the more prominent main page? Biblioworm 07:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the OP. @Future Perfect at Sunrise: Also see similar request below. Samsara 14:23, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Turns out this has been discussed with the protecting admin, and declined. It expires in three days anyway - maybe we can live with it for that long and spare ourselves further meta-discussion. Samsara 16:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Discussion stale. Samsara 20:41, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Please remove semi-protection. The semi-protected edit requests that go to the talk page are as disruptive as the trolling (which can be ignored or blocked). Robert McClenon (talk) 20:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See question above. Biblioworm 07:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Per above - stale. Samsara 20:41, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP-hopping vandal

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP-hopping vandal changing release dates slightly so they don't match sources given. Eik Corell (talk) 14:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (all of them) Samsara 05:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism vidhyahere (talk)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 01:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)\[reply]

Temporary semi protection due to persistent vandalism. Since the last protection expired this article gets hit on a regular (maybe not daily but close to it) basis. MarnetteD|Talk 03:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CAPTAIN RAJU (talk) 21:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you point to some recent vandalism please? It looks more like IP's are pointing out that you're making mistakes (mistakes you've been acknowledging). Why would you want to prevent people pointing out mistakes you've made? --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined NeilN talk to me 01:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - IP editor(s) reapetedly edited the page and caused a large amount of destruction including saying kaitlyn jenner was the head coach and saying the band sucks amoung many other comments and the page is now in need of temorary semi-protection asap please. Bc5297

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Biblioworm 22:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If it makes a difference, Bc5297 got the article link wrong. It should be Texas Longhorns football. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, I declined the request for the correct article, not the misspelled redirect. --Biblioworm 22:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism from IP and new editors. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 23:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 01:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. KH-1 (talk) 04:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the page became unprotected, the IP was back to add the same unsourced biographical info. Dismas|(talk) 22:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dismas, I've also blocked the 2604:6000:f842:e400::/64 range for 3 months. Let's see if that stops it. NeilN talk to me 01:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate it, Neil. Dismas|(talk) 02:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Unused, about to be moved to project space after TfD. Alakzi (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 02:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Sony has already announced their PlayStation 5. Sooner or later this future console may meet the notability guidelines and will have its own article. It was deleted 3 times in September 2008, the first 2 times as A1 and the third as G3, when the PlayStation 3 was just released (I think). TL22 (talk) 00:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Biblioworm 02:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Youth rugby league club redirects

Full semi-protection of redirects: An IP user keeps removing the redirects and attempting to create article stubs against the consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby league#Unsourced Australian club stubs RugbyXIII (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Friend (or GF?) of Justin Bieber. Maybe. IP edits the last month are useless. Some of them need revdel. Basically all in November. Sam Sailor Talk! 21:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive edit warring without discussion. 81.129.158.95 (talk) 01:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war from last night still on going. Lerdthenerd wiki defender 13:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{RFPP}} MusikAnimal talk 18:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@MusikAnimal: Are you aware that the supposedly still-ongoing edit war has stopped (except for an editor who realized and reverted himself) pending two debates on noticeboards,[43][44] in which an administrator (the only class of users now allowed to edit the article) is implicated? LjL (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm protection still seems justified, given the number of editors we are working with. I wouldn't worry about the one admin in particular taking control somewhere they are clearly involved. Protected edit requests can be made and implemented accordingly MusikAnimal talk 18:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Edit warring had stopped, though. We're all talking, in three places (talk pages and two noticeboards). Why did the article really need to be locked down so tight? LjL (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Back down to semi. See the talk page. Thank you for your understanding MusikAnimal talk 19:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@MusikAnimal: So by editing articles, I can stop them from having full protection applied? Or any admin, for that matter? Please clarify, as the rules for editing fully protected articles are quite clear afaik. Samsara 19:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if I follow you? Articles are subject to full protection when multiple confirmed accounts engage in edit warring. It is a means purely to prevent disruption (edit wars make the wiki look bad!), not protect the "right" version. Fully protected articles can only be edited by admins, but any admin in their right mind will not edit it if they are involved in the dispute. Mind if we take this to Talk:Killing of Cecil the lion? RFPP isn't really meant for discussion MusikAnimal talk 19:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think the "not having discussion" horse has bolted. LjL complained in multiple venues that I am the only recent editor to the article who can still edit the article, and insinuated that I would do so. However, the rules for editing protected pages are quite clear, and there could be no reasonable assumption that I would contravene them. LjL used his allegation as the reason for requesting unprotection, and you honoured the request, which can be seen as confirming his allegation that I would edit a fully protected page to my "advantage", but more worryingly it creates a new precedent where any page that has been recently been edited by an admin cannot be fully protected. This does not seem to be in the spirit of the policy. I just also saw that another admin view on this has already been posted. Samsara 19:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like we're jumping to conclusions. To justify my actions (which I think are being questioned?), I assumed you wouldn't edit the page while it was protected, which I believe I made clear. The fact you were involved played no factor in my decision making. LjL's argument for unprotection was that the edit war had ended, or at least that was my interpretation. The idea that any page that an admin has recently edited can't be fully protected is, as you know, completely false, and I hope LjL knows that too. I don't see how that conclusion can be drawn from this. I was merely trying to reach a compromise of opening the article up for editing (ideal) and controlling the edit war (a must). MusikAnimal talk 20:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying. Samsara 20:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think it was the combination of one admin being involved in the edit war and the fact that the edit war seemed to have stopped that, put together, gave me a sense that the protection was unjustified and sent the wrong message. LjL (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@LjL: An admin being involved in the dispute has nothing to do with requesting protection/unprotection, ever. Do not worry about that. MusikAnimal talk 21:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced content. MYS77 13:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mostly 203.82.80.3. If after sufficient warning disruption persists, report to AIV MusikAnimal talk 18:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Indefinite Persistent vandalism - Semi-protection fell off after a short stint of full protection. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 23:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 01:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection due to incessant IP vandalism (see [45]). Quis separabit? 00:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And PC for 6 months. NeilN talk to me 01:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a controversial and contradictory information., war edits. Zeit23 (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 22:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Unregistered editor persists in removing template and will not discuss. Article was semi-protected in the past. Longer semi-protection needed. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 21:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor edit warring to insert a fringe view of years for defining generations; tendentious editor who has caused a requirement for page protection across multiple articles on generations, such as Millennials, Generation X, etc. IP editor changes IP almost daily, so requesting a block would not help. ScrpIronIV 21:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 21:54, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incoming attack from newly-created users. Need semi-protection until the trolls are starved off. McDoobAU93 14:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 2 weeks by Ohnoitsjamie. tutterMouse (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Not sure if Talk pages are usually protected, but in this case we have multiple IPs (but almost certainly the same person) continually re-adding a small section on why she's obese (diff). If it was a sensible discussion, I'd leave it, but it's just there to belittle her. Bromley86 (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. They aren't usually, but I have semiprotected it for four days in the hopes that the IPs lose interest. Handing out some warnings/blocks may helps as well. kelapstick(bainuu) 19:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks kelapstick. I was going to add the warnings, but as the IPs are cycling fairly quickly I figured it was a case of "don't feed the trolls". Bromley86 (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a target lately for disruptive edits . Murry1975 (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute, principally driven by anon IPs. No discussion on talk page yet and protection (even full protection) should get it going. McDoobAU93 20:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi protection - an IP has declared their intention to continue to disrupt. [46] and kept their promise [47]. potentially related to the disruptive IP that has led to the protection of other Bruce Lee/Concorde articles [48] -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  14:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One Month. Galaxy Kid (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  14:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Repeated attempts by an editor (who was blocked twice last month for edit warring) to add incorrect, biased and poorly-written text; discussions are ongoing, but they continue to make the same changes. It would be good to have this page locked as I have reached 3RR (if you include reverting the cut & paste move they attempted at the start). Cheers Number 57 17:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 18:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request on own space. Jetstreamer Talk 17:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Biblioworm 18:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from 2 IP address. Requesting 1 week semi-protection. Ferakp (talk) 00:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's still not enough to warrant protection. It's also debatable whether it's vandalism. GedUK  13:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IPv6 unreferenced additions and section deletions. Same IP making similar changes that led to List of Mr. Box Office episodes being protected. . Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, It's one IP mainly. The other IP edits aren't really distruptive. Report the main IP to AIV if they continue GedUK  13:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NebY (talk) 08:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  13:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Retaliatory vandalism for removing persistent vandalism from User talk:DeCausa. NebY (talk) 08:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  13:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Was protected before but same disruptive editing continues, requesting longer duration. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 15:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 16:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. I've changed this to indefinite. Looking through the logs and page history, the article seems to be an endless target for vandals. Biblioworm 17:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial subject. check protection log. Indefinite protection will stop vandalism, but can't stop content dispute. Still indefinite is required. Galaxy Kid (talk) 13:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. GedUK  14:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  14:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting due to vandalism shortly after release of RPP. Donnie Park (talk) 14:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I thought I'd done them all, but missed that one. 1 month to match the rest. GedUK  14:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 23:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of Janagewen (see SPI) persistently evade block to post on this page. General Ization Talk 03:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 09:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. GedUK  13:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Zero useful edits by IPs/non-confirmed for three weeks. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has seen persistent vandalism by several new accounts in the past week, doesn't seem to stop. UCaetano (talk) 10:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. GedUK  13:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting temporary, but long-term temporary, like 6 mo or a year. Fringe POV person(s) with multiple IP's and throwaway accounts. Started back up when my previous 1 month protection expired. . Floquenbeam (talk) 12:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two days. Galaxy Kid (talk) 13:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since this page appeared in WP:ITN and as I previously mentioned in the last RPP, the vandalism/POV pushing has reappeared again due to the controversial nature of the season finale. Also requests for Marc Márquez and likely an extension for Jorge Lorenzo and see how it all goes whilst this remains in ITN. Donnie Park (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP repeatedly adding claim that these two actors are married to each other, without any references, or any indication on news sites that the claim is true. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent IP attempting to create a non-notable article. Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An IP has been edit warring for the past week by changing the name of a weight class without consensus. They have been invited to join in the discussion at WikiProject Boxing, but no answer from them and yet more edit warring every few days. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've warned them for edit warring, if they continue please report to WP:ANEW. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporal semi-protection: the page "July 2013 Latakia explosion" is a redirect, created by merging an article per standard procedure. Currently a changing range of IPs, which is likely identified with a banned sock master, is constantly recreating the article.GreyShark (dibra) 18:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indefinite, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: requesting protection due to persistent vandalism. TeriEmbrey (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 21:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi protection due to persistent vandalism (see [49]). Quis separabit? 02:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Xavier12121108 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Samsara 05:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: requesting protection due to persistent vandalism.--RenRen070193 13:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RenRen070193 (talkcontribs)

Declined Don't see a need here. Samsara 17:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: requesting protection due to persistent vandalism. --RenRen070193 13:51, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Declined Don't see a need here. Samsara 17:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Numerous IP editors, presumably fans of the game, have been coming to the article since the game was released to change the reception section from a sourced statement of "positive/favorable reviews" to "critical acclaim". Typically, critical acclaim is reserve for games with an average of 90+ for reviews. This has been edit warred on for several days now. -- ferret (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sergecross73. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Dynamic IPv6 unexplained, dubious changes in dates. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. History of protection. '''tAD''' (talk) 02:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Used in the interface (MediaWiki:Sp-contributions-footer-anon). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Used in the interface (MediaWiki:Sp-contributions-footer-anon). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 19:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Used in the interface (MediaWiki:Sp-contributions-footer-anon). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Callanecc: Just checking ... semi-protected? Steel1943 (talk) 23:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's only got 300 transclusions, my cut off for TE is around 1000. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Two days. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The vandalism seems to be several days apart. Biblioworm 17:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With Friday the 13th already here in some places and coming up elsewhere, this page is sure to be hardly hit by vandals (as it has been in the past, such as March 13). We should start making it a habit to protect the page every time a Friday the 13th comes up as that is obviously when the vandals attack (most). <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 21:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, removal of referenced information without consensus. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It looks like they're quite determined, so I've protected both for a week. Biblioworm 22:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14 November 2015

Not done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism. Has escalated with the recent Paris attacks. FallingGravity (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Semi. I don't know if this was protected the last time I asked, but it's under attack again by an IP deleting the ISO name of the language. They used to demand "sources" (which were already in the article) and then would delete them when I added them to the lead. Looks like Baganda is fine for now, but it's suffered the same problem. — kwami (talk) 19:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs vandalising the page in local language. Galaxy Kid (talk) 03:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 81.174.176.189 (talk) 12:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:22, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – A BLP about a porn actor that is vandalised virtually every day by IPs and new user accounts, vandalism that most often is of a very immature kind. Thomas.W talk 12:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 13:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's IP vandalism, and some IP disruptive editing. Widefox; talk 20:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw a lot of activity, but no obvious vandalism and few plain reverts. Can you be more specific? --Stephan Schulz (talk) 20:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Context: 1. it's a 1RR - so tricky for editors to not accidentally go over with this current event. 2. The 99% unconfirmed dead issue means there's two valid states that flip-flop [50] [51] 3. [52] 4. it's sustained - have another look. Widefox; talk 00:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll second Widefox's request, as I've been reverting a number of IP changes along these lines. Current Talk position, stated by an editor who has been following the Emwazi situation for a while and who (as far as I can see) has been correctly applying BLP/accuracy with respect to the numerous reports over the past year or so, is that it's unconfirmed, so shouldn't be in as a fact yet. Makes sense to me. Bromley86 (talk) 00:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Ping User:Stephan Schulz Widefox; talk 01:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I took a second look, and have the impression that many users are over-involved and in danger of breaking 1RR. I've fully protected the page for 12 hours (almost certainly the WP:WRONGVERSION) to allow people to step back and take a breather (and maybe simply for new news to help solve the dispute - we have no WP:DEADLINE). --Stephan Schulz (talk) 10:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Non notable autobiography and business promotion by persistent disruptive account. Have requested block. 2601:188:0:ABE6:A43C:AFE6:B4B2:A1D7 (talk) 08:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring from SEVERAL IPs and anonymous users. 81.129.158.95 (talk) 09:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Relentless edit-warring by dynamic IPs and new account adding unsourced birthdays. Dr. K. 04:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

tons of vandalism recently by different accounts/ips Brj312JXa0An1mO (talk) 04:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP's constantly adding/re-adding inaccurate info and changing info. LLArrow (talk) 04:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to have become a target of IP editors. Can we get a lock in place please?. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Anons are currently edit warring as they insist on making non-constructive edits, such as the addition of unsourced trivial information, redundant subsections, and WP:ANTAGONIST violations. DarkKnight2149 14:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued re-instatement of page that fails to meet the notability for concert tours persistently, by both registered and non-registered users. livelikemusic my talk page! 20:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection due to incessant vandalism (see [53]). Quis separabit? 03:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing by removal of sourced content and edit warring from IPs and anonymous users. 81.129.158.95 (talk) 18:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 23:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP editor is edit warring to perform a cut-and-paste move. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Or WP:ANEW NeilN talk to me 23:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 23:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive edits. MarkYabloko 08:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 23:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of musician name. Binksternet (talk) 14:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 23:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A party that is engaged as a defendant in a lawsuit (SRepetti) has committed vandalism and serious BLP violations. A view of the public logs shows that Srepetti tagged the page and then an anonymous user almost immediately made defamatory edits to the page. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zude as that establishes the connection. Please see http://courtcon.co.palm-beach.fl.us/pls/jiwp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?backto=P&case_id=502015CC006370XXXXMB&begin_date=&end_date= as it documents that SRepetti is the defendant in current litigation. SelgeBrown (talk) 02:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SelgeBrown, both your behavior and that of Srepetti has been atrocious. NeilN talk to me 03:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP edit-warring with several editors. RolandR (talk) 00:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A significant amount of recent vandalism and serious BLP violations. A view of the public logs shows that the page has had to be protected a number of times in the past due to persistent vandalism and violations of the biographies of living persons. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A significant amount of recent vandalism and serious BLP violations. A view of the public logs shows that the page has had to be protected a number of times in the past due to persistent vandalism and violations of the biographies of living persons. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once semi-protection was dropped, the number of illegitimate edits and revert has skyrocketed with a lot of vandalism/unsourced information being added. NottNott talk|contrib 19:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Effect of semi-protection would be negative as IP users are developing the article and undoing vandalism. Samsara 20:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Misgendering and misnaming the lead singer. clpo13(talk) 00:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 month. NeilN talk to me 00:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism related to the November 2015 Paris attacks. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

temporary semi-protection more Bruce Lee/Concorde trolling. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:12, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting 3 week semi. Various users, mostly IPs, keep insisting that one episode in particular is in S3 when the sourced production/episode code clearly indicates that it is a S2 episode. Discussion has taken place, no logical counter-argument was presented, yet editors keep asserting their POV [54][55] Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs claiming he was killed in the November 2015 Paris attacks. No confirmation one way or the other. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: POV edit-warring by multiple IPs (presumably the same individual) against several registered editors. RolandR (talk) 14:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Swarm. NeilN talk to me 23:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 19:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 19:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or at least pending changes. Things are happening very quickly on this page and it is hard to separate the good edits from the bad at the moment. MarnetteD|Talk 23:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cyclonebiskit. NeilN talk to me 23:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive edits from non-confirmed editors. Steel1943 (talk) 02:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP edit warring and other unconstructive edits. Everymorning (talk) 19:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent vandalism of celebrity bio, BLP violations. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 23:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Increase in IP vandalism this week. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 23:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: IP hopping vandal has been targeting the page since its creation. This vandal is particularly persistent, so I would suggest a reasonably lengthy period of semi-protection (up to several months). IgnorantArmies (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Semi 2 weeks, PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 19:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 19:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Diannaa. NeilN talk to me 19:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. clpo13(talk) 20:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indef. AlexiusHoratius 20:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WadeSimMiser (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'd appreciate it. And I would add User:Cliftonian and talk:Jesus as both are vandalized by the same dynamic IP vandalizing my page. Jeppiz (talk) 15:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Harrias. NeilN talk to me 18:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WadeSimMiser (talk) 15:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Harrias. NeilN talk to me 18:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: From indefinite semi-protection to unprotected. Protection was applied on October 1, the article is far quieter now, little justification for continued protection. Protecting admin has done about 60 edits since I requested unprotection on their talk page. I have a non-trivial edit that I need to do so I can move on. Thanks. 72.198.26.61 (talk) 16:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Unfortunately, given the sheer number of edits and that this is a current and developing event I don't believe that unprotection would be the best idea at the moment. Until then you can make an edit request on the talk page. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, that's a departure from what has been my (2+ years) experience with semi-protection in articles like this. I've found that we try to remove protection as soon as there is no known threat, to err on the side of underprotection. Remember, the protection was applied on the day of the event, over six weeks ago. Like I said, relatively quiet now - 100 edits in the past month - 18 this month - 0 in the past five days. We can certainly re-apply protection fairly easily if unconfirmed users suddenly descend and wreak havoc. And, no, I can't make an edit request because, as I said, my edit is non-trivial. It's not "please insert this text after this text".
Will another admin take a look at this please? 72.198.26.61 (talk) 13:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cascading protected templates

Indefinite full protection: Please revert the "protection downgrade" from permanent protection to template protection. This page is cascade-protected; a cascade-protected page with template protection creates a misleading "edit" option on the page when no one (except admins) can actually edit it. Steel1943 (talk) 19:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Steel1943: Can you explain why this template requires "full protection," when "template protection" -- edits limited to administrators and template editors -- has obviously been adequate protection since 2013? I believe situations such as this widely used template are exactly why template protection exists. Qualified template editors may still make revisions, and editors may make edit requests on the template talk page. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template editors cannot edit a cascade-protected page, even if the page has template protection. Steel1943 (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I now understand your request: you want to remove the cascade protection, leaving only template protection, correct? BTW, weirdly, I edited your request for Template:Birth date and age, not this one, but my edit posted here. I have encountered this problem from time to time in the past, when the displayed "edit" button for one section opens an edit dialog window for a different section on the same page. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dirtlawyer1: Actually, the exact opposite. I'm requesting that "full protection" be "technically" put back on the template since having a "template protection/cascading-protection" combination causes a glitch with Wikipedia's interface, giving template editors a "edit" option on the page when they actually cannot edit the page. I have no opinion on wherever or not the cascading protection should be removed. Steel1943 (talk) 20:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Steel1943: I think this is unnecessary. What if the templates are removed from the list of cascading protected items? Then we'll get another RFPP to downgrade to template protection. We're not changing anything by fully protecting it. A misleading edit button is trivial. NeilN, any thoughts? MusikAnimal talk 21:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When I saw the mass nominations I stopped and asked Fuhghettaboutit what they intended. [56] Waiting for an answer. --NeilN talk to me 22:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • (edit conflict) @MusikAnimal: I have to respectfully disagree with this for a couple of reasons. For one, this method, and this point, seems a lot more effective than requesting an interface update, given my experiences with that (cannot find a diff for the life of me right now though.) And two, if cascading protection is also meant to move protect a page, that is bypassed when a page has template protection/cascading-protection; I have the template editor right, and for some odd and probably unintentional reason, I don't have the ability to edit these pages, but I can move them. If cascade-protection is supposed to do what it is intended to do, placing template protection on it as well causes several software hiccups. Either we fix the problem (the interface) or we put a bandage over it until the problem is fixed (fixing the protection settings issue, though it's more like weakly stitching the wound per the "page move" issue I states above). Not doing anything, such as declining these requests, is like saying we refuse to do anything to fix a problem. Steel1943 (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, this is more of a flaw (or a bug) in the MediaWiki software (feel free to file a phab report). There must be tons of other templates under cascading protection that still have edit buttons. Should we protect all of those too? What if cascading protection is removed, say when the templates are no longer on the main page. Now the high-risk is gone so I have to unprotect all those templates. I'd rather the reason for protection live on the parent template or page, where the cascading protection was actually applied. MusikAnimal talk 22:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(e/cx2) When the template editor right was first established, I started changing a bunch of templates from full protection to allow template editors and admins to edit but received pushback here. I'm not sure, but it seems we may have never have had the discussion about lowering the protection level of many templates to allow the template editor right to function. Anyway, I was unaware these templates were using the old cascading protection method. Certainly it does not make sense to have a template say it can be edited when it can't. But the question seems to have become which direction to go: remove them from cascading protection so their current protection level actual matches, or restore full-protection so they aren't falsely advertising the ability to edit by template editors.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly have no strong feelings, just wanted to share my 2c. My main point is there must be a lot of templates that falsely advertise that they can be edited. It's not just these that have cascading protection. And from a programming perspective, which I know doesn't really apply, I like to think of the single cascading protection on the parent page as the "refactoring" point, whereby the protection functionality exists and can be managed in one place. To be fair, a lot of these templates are probably also used in the MediaWiki namespace and should be fully protected anyway, but for those that are not, protecting them individually doesn't make much sense to me. You still can edit it, who cares if there's an edit button? If you went to make an edit but can't, make an edit request and we'll do it for you MusikAnimal talk 22:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment unrelated to the discussion above (sort of): I've tried a few times to reorganize this section so that the discussion about these templates, as well as the other templates related to this discussion, are "pulled away" from the other unrelated requests so that other admins can answer unrelated requests without having to scroll through this, but I've now received 4 edit conflicts, so I have to give up. Steel1943 (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes let's do this. I will try too MusikAnimal talk 22:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright! Done, minus the requests to lower protection. Does Twinkle not let you mass-request protection and format it like this? Or is that yet another thing I have put on the to-dos? =P MusikAnimal talk 22:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @MusikAnimal: Twinkle does not. In fact, I don't think it is capable of mass-nominating any group of pages since it performs the functions only on the page that is being viewed (and the respective noticeboards/user talk pages as a result). That, and it's a bit helpful to use when editing with the desktop version of Wikipedia on a mobile device. (I was "cherry-picking" through Category:Wikipedia fully-protected templates from the top alphabetically to see which ones needed protection fixes of sorts.) :) Steel1943 (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't seem to be the right forum for discussion of the meta issue, so unless others chime toward a consensus in that we should be removing them from cascading, and since it was an undiscussed change at the time done, in a few hours I'll change them all back to full protection.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Fuhghettaboutit: No opposition here. Just don't forget about Twinkle's batch protection feature! (Use it on this page and select the appropriate page). Cheers MusikAnimal talk 01:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@MusikAnimal, Fuhghettaboutit, and NeilN: Either way, before this entry is archived, is there any agreement that we may need to move this discussion elsewhere to determine a complete resolution to this ... Especially considering that this list is just "(symbols)-C" on the list? Steel1943 (talk) 02:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, hmm, I suppose If there were to be discussion it would be at Wikipedia talk:Template editor (maybe advertising at the pump), but it seems to me this discussion is just a prompt for a different discussion (if at all). Who cares about these few templates. The issue is whether there should be some mass lowering of protection to allow the template editor right to be more functional.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Fuhghettaboutit: Agreed. If anything, this list is proof that change needs to happen on the template editor front. Steel1943 (talk) 03:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, move the discussion. Basically, I'm in favor of anything that make editors' lives easier but doesn't give admins RSI protecting/unprotecting :) --NeilN talk to me 03:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copied to here. --NeilN talk to me 18:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 18:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – 3 Times in one day and 1 earlier today. Angry Bald English Villian Man (talk) 07:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The talk page is being recrated by a bot as the main page is being recreated. I've blocked the user responsible for that so let's see what happens now. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:54, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopping anonymous user (identifiable by style of edit summaries; distinctive errors such as "hes" instead of "he is") repeatedly changes introduction from "American" to "English American" based on the fact that this performer notable as an American was born in England, even though WP:OPENPARA says "previous nationalities or the country of birth should not be mentioned in the opening sentence unless they are relevant to the subject's notability". Have quoted WP:OPENPARA in edit summaries repeatedly; IP has called me a "fucktard", told me to "stfu" and cannot seem to get his head around the fact that birth in England doesn't necessarily make one a British citizen anyway. Requesting semi-protection. —  Cliftonian (talk)  08:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (rangeblock). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hopping insertion of an external link to a fan site that is a supposedly "official site" for a game that is no longer supported by the manufacturer. This has been going on for years.. Meters (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (2A02:C7D:637B:A400:0:0:0:0/64) Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps making massive changes to page affecting whole article. This is chronic. Also targeting sister page Monica Geller. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 06:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I've rangeblocked 75.120.64.0/18 for a month so I'd rather see whether that has an effect before protecting articles. Could you please let me know if it continues. Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper doing major page damage for the past month; also targeting sister page: Rachel Green. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 06:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I've rangeblocked 75.120.64.0/18 for a month so I'd rather see whether that has an effect before protecting articles. Could you please let me know if it continues. Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent and recurring target of sockpuppets, mostly belonging to Lpkids2006. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:04, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how that goes first. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Will expire in three or two hours. I couldn't contact the administrator when the expiration is so soon. --George Ho (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal. General Ization Talk 23:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Page was already protected, but it's only through updates subject to review. That still allows some IPs to vandalize as some tried. I'd like to ask for semi-protection for only auto-confirmed users. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 00:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mark Arsten. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on a BLP. Everymorning (talk) 02:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: to Indefinite full protection: please 112.209.86.65 (talk) 05:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Steel1943: Could you please tell me about this template? It's linked from a bunch of places but not transcluded anywhere. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 23:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Callanecc: I just tried to figure it out as well; I'm still scratching my head; if I had to guess, I'd think the clue is in Template:Admin dashboard somewhere. However, I suspect that the template is used in the ".js skins" somewhere since I don't believe that the aforementioned template is transcluded in all of those user pages. In fact, I suspect my request should be denied, and this template cascade-protected (though I cannot find this template linked on a single "MediaWiki:" page.) Steel1943 (talk) 02:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's my thinking, I've got no idea what it's supposed to do, or whether it might be obsolete, MusikAnimal do you know? Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think I ever got the ping... anyway it looks like this is supposed to be substituted, which must be why there's no transclusions. I assume it is the CSS counterpart to {{InstallUserScript}}, and since some user scripts have an accompanying CSS file, this template might be in the installation instructions. Per the current protection rationale, a malicious editor could add code in here that will end up in a user's personal JS, and steal cookies, etc, but I'm not worried about template editors doing that. MusikAnimal talk 18:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – So that template editors may edit. Steel1943 (talk) 23:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trolling by banned user again. TL22 (talk) 20:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 22:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Frequent IP edits to a highly viewed page (21591 views in the last 30 days). // Posted by larsona (Talk) // 00:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Biblioworm 00:40, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism on the first table that concern the section "Total population" and "Regions with significant populations" by changing or deleting data. Tsarisco (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, frequent reverting of removal and addition of images (currently being discussed at: Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 13#File:Abd_el-Krim_khattabi - from Commons.jpg). Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 05:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 05:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Same editor that caused North Vietnamese parliamentary election, 1946 to be fully-protected yesterday is also causing problems on this template. Cheers, Number 57 16:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 21:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP edit warrior. Debresser (talk) 16:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - only one IP and stopped a few hours ago - report to AIV or relist here if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 22:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 6 incidents of vandalism in the last week or so. The page was semi-protected for six months, to see if that would fix the problem; the protection expired on 15 October, and the vandalism has reappeared. It seems to me a longer period of semi-protection is now required. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. If six months won't do it, I'm not sure if any other temporary duration will, so I've semi-protected it indefinitely. Biblioworm 00:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kim Zolciak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • Indefinite semi-protection: I don't know why this article subject is the sporadic target of so much vitriol, but it's a regular occurrence, and now this current batch of anon IPs is violating not only WP:BLP but also WP:SYNTH by saying, in essence, "The subject is a liar because I've checked and the university doesn't give that kind of degree" — even though the anon IP's OR contradicts an RS third-party source, the well-regarded newspaper the Hartford Courant. Looking at the anon-IP edits cumulatively, it looks like the work of acquaintances with axes to grind. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit-warring, vandalism by dynamic IPs from Spain. Dr. K. 22:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP content removal and maintenance tag removal since last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One year. Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated additions of poorly sourced or unsourced material by IP users. DPH1110 (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Challenge season articles have historically been plagued by unsourced spoiler vandalism and additions of poorly-sourced content until the end of their initial run on MTV; three-month semi-protection should cover the duration of the season. DPH1110 (talk) 19:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:21, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two days. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persisting insertion of POV regarding the Subway guy. Protect until situation with him vs criminal activity clarifies please. John from Idegon (talk) 16:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One year. Protected previously. IP vandals come back regularly. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long time disruptive editing. Check History. So many reverts by Users. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 22:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16 November 2015

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Mr.vivek0305 (talk) 06:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC) Vandalism is being observed on this article. Various users have tried to conflict the article, I request the article should be semi-protected (temporarily) before anyone else does this.[reply]

Declined Non-autoconfirmed users are making useful edits here. Please deal with vandalism on a case-by-case basis when it happens, reporting to WP:AIV. Samsara 17:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip vandal. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 17:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing unsourced/poorly sourced changes. Previous semi-protection was for one week. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Non-autoconfirmed users making good edits, frequency of unsourced edits not high enough to justify collateral damage. Samsara 17:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary unprotection. Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 17:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: The user Inaayaimranaslam is constantly vandalising the page Imran Aslam (entertainer) by moving it constatntly.Please have a Look at these links, [57], [58]. Page must be move and vandalism protected. D'SuperHero (talk) 14:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 16:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 16:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. The usual. Disruptive edits etc. SlightSmile 18:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, BLP violations.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit-warring by IPs on the leading ethnic description. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Heavy vandalism activity on 4th, 5th and 9th of November. In addition, the majority of the revision history between 12 October to 16 November consists of forth-and-back reverts, with no significant changes. It appears this article has reached such maturity that there is no significant genuine editing activity on it; at least, not those than can be seriously disrupted by a permanent Pending Changes (PC) protection. Let's active PC and get rid of vandalism forever. Fleet Command (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Volume on those days is too high for PC, and there's not enough recent activity for semi-protection. I've watchlisted and will apply protection, warnings or blocks if the IP editor makes a re-appearance. There are plenty of active page watchers, anyway. Samsara 14:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent promotional edits and copyright violations by several IPs. 2601:188:0:ABE6:2C7F:6EC8:FD4E:9E3B (talk) 14:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal changing Ips to post nonsense. Galaxy Kid (talk) 14:42, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Slow but constant vandalism and disruptive editing. Galaxy Kid (talk) 14:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much of recent vandalism and has a large history of protection log. Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Indefinitely. Major topic unlikely to ever be out of the line of fire in the foreseeable future. Samsara 17:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andyjsmith (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor (whom I have already reported) disrupting the page. The page also comes under attack from IP's on regular basis. Plz semi prot for a month. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 12:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Check this protection log. This is a very popular Mountain which will bring vandals. The edit History of November is full of Disruptive editing. This article is not about a recent event which will face temporary vandalism. Rocky mountains will always be taught in School Geography. . Galaxy Kid (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:03, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – check log and too much vandalism recently. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP has been repeatedly adding false information to the article for weeks. PM800 (talk) 01:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. (one month pending changes) by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 12:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Several articles targeted by IP hopping sock

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from IP hopping sock of banned user (I removed the earlier reports I just made to include them here instead) Jeppiz (talk) 12:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

which user? I am not a banned user. I am not a user of this wiki at all. I am only an ip editor, and i am not a sock! Sock of who by the way? Jeppiz is a liar meat puppet of user:decausa.--176.204.38.78 (talk) 12:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. on all of these. AlexiusHoratius 12:50, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two Ips of the same range making serious vandalism as this and this. Galaxy Kid (talk) 14:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals. Buffaboy talk 05:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same participants have picked up the same edit war now that the last full protection has expired. VQuakr (talk) 06:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: No problem if another admin wants to protect again but I warned editors there would be blocks if edit warring continued after the last protection expired. Monochrome Monitor is now on a two week ARBPIA topic ban and 7uperWkipedan is on the edge of a block. NeilN talk to me 06:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Let's see how NeilN's solution works first. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Sock puppetry . Zippy654 (talk) 07:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The accounts weren't autoconfirmed so the current protection level will work, plus it's been more than two weeks since the last account edited the page. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, presumably by the same individual under multiple IPs. Dave.Dunford (talk) 10:21, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2 weeks of silver lock requested. Anon IP's have been having a field day on this article. . FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 12:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Philip J Fry talk 10:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. two weeks by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 12:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Sockmaster blanking the talk page in including unblock Declines. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 22:55, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User now warned not to do it again. If they continue their talk page access can be revoked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I had to revert some long-standing IP vandalism that was obviously vandalism. Those pieces of vandalism had not been noticed by any user, not even ClueBot NG. Please semi-protect. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 01:03, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't like this sort of default comment. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 01:05, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
From the link: "This level of protection is useful when there is a significant amount of disruption or vandalism from new or unregistered users, and/or to prevent sock puppets of blocked or banned users from editing..." --NeilN talk to me 01:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But the piece of vandalism had not been removed since October 6th 2015. That is significant vandalism. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 06:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There were also lots of other edits that stack from the vandalism from October 6th 2015. Still then, no one had EVER noticed but the IPs. That is a significant amount of disruption. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 06:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by unregistered users.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 9:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP continuously adding the same content without any source. Spc 21 (talk) 11:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:38, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism regarding the album's critical reception. This has been going on for more than a month. Strawberries1 (talk) 03:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – seems to be a target of vandals all of a sudden. Was he on the news recently or did he do something? Anyway, Silver lock plz. . FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 08:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and revenge reverts by a sock puppet. One set of IPs is adding nonsense WP:HOAX material to the article [59] based on a source which does not appear to exist [60], and now another IP (a sockpuppet) which has a grudge against me in particular has jumped in to restore that IPs hoax edits, simply because I am one of the editors (there are others) who has removed. Seriously, can someone please deal with this?  Volunteer Marek  08:50, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hotspot for anti-Ahmadiyya Holy warrior IPs. Brustopher (talk) 10:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 14:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Someone keeps adding unsourced speculations that there will certainly be a "Tangled" sequel. Carniolus (talk) 22:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Someone keeps adding unsourced speculations that there will certainly be a "Tangled" sequel. Carniolus (talk) 22:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Someone keeps adding unsourced speculations that there will certainly be a "Tangled" sequel. Carniolus (talk) 22:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Subject page's creator has already blanked the page. JesseRafe (talk) 02:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 02:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – On-going content disputes with editors with entrenched views edit warring over a long period. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite is too long. I can re-protect the page for a longer period if the edit war resumes after the protection expires. Biblioworm 01:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism since the Washington Post report.[61]―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 02:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 02:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes: Persistant addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 01:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And PLEASE do not say "Not enough disruptive activity to justify protection". It is way too vague. 115.188.191.246 (talk) 01:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Looks like a lot of edit warring, including repeated removal of sourced content. COI is also apparent, perhaps from several opposing accounts. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP adding fake info to article. Long-term. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 01:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Restarted after last protect for this expired. Same person in dynamic IPv6 range (2601:646:8F01:84FF::/64) adding unreferenced and likely false info. Persistent for a long time. This article looks to be a particular target. A range block would also fix this. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 2601:646:8f01:84ff::/64 blocked for 3 months NeilN talk to me 20:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Over 1300 transclusions. Steel1943 (talk) 22:38, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Samsara 00:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – No reason for this to ever become an article, and it's a natural target for vandals. Kharkiv07 (T) 23:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. NeilN talk to me 23:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Block expired and edit warring about section removal started again. Please protect and warn the warriors. Denniss (talk) 13:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. One editor blocked for violating WP:1RR NeilN talk to me 18:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High visibility as currently on reality TV show. Article attracting disruptive edits and vandalism. Egghead06 (talk) 21:38, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 60 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Someone keeps adding unsourced speculations that there will certainly be a "Tangled" sequel. Carniolus (talk) 22:19, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 60 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 19:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – 1+1 is too tempting as a target for disruptive edits - this happened to 1+1 (channel) while it was at the base name. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 19:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (A bit slow but every edit I saw was vandalism.) AlexiusHoratius 19:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – school tag team targeting this at present.  Velella  Velella Talk   19:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 19:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continued following release of RPP. Donnie Park (talk) 17:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry and IP vandalism. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – This lack of protection for this subpage of the protected template Template:AFC submission appears to be an oversight. This sub-template is widely transcluded and there is little utility in making it readily edited. LukeSurl t c 15:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Samsara 17:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 16:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by more than a handful of new usernames DVdm (talk) 17:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IPv6. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism throughout the month. One IP in particular (1) keeps vandalising the fight record table, doing so again today under a different IP (2). In fact, they've been at it since July (3). Mac Dreamstate (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Just in good faith. Generally though, for dealing with a single user that doesn't seem to have a lot of IPs available, blocks and block warnings will be more effective. We shouldn't semi this for six months over just one user. Samsara 17:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal changing aircraft role without discussion. As it is not "obvious" vandalism, and IP is hopping, protection is requested. One of the three IP's did break 3RR, but had not been warned before fourth reversion. As soon as the 3RR warning was placed, changed IP. ScrpIronIV 16:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 60 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Low-intensity but persistent and long-lasting vandalism of ip editors. Suggest at least a 6 months semi-protection. Wolbo (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To avoid a potential edit-war from editors insisting that page qualifies, despite it failing to meet criteria for notable concert tours. livelikemusic my talk page! 04:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, The only place that can decide whether something does or doesn't meet a notability guideline or the GNG is AfD. This doesn't seem to have been there, and the sources provided would be enough to pass Speedy Deletion. I can't see a reason to protect this article at this point, not least because the most recent editors would be unaffected by a semi protection. If you don't think it's notable, take it to AfD. GedUK  12:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continued reverting of edits by user, Gunkarta, which appears to be pushing a political agenda by removing information about a protest and replacing it with information stating there is no serious issue between the two countries. The user is also twisiting politicians words that are present in the source and adding their own opinion "stating that anyone who raises such matters is immature, and such issues should not be blown out of proportion". (137.147.182.33 (talk) 06:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Declined, Semi protection would mean that he could edit it, and you couldn't so that doesn't seem sensible from your perspective. Start a discussion on the talk page rather than constantly reverting, or the whole thing will be protected and not necessarily on your preferred version. GedUK  12:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Anonymous users repeatedly removing summary of Nail salon series controversy. Jsg68x (talk) 12:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Several established user involved in extensive reverting back and forth. Better to let them talk it out on the talk page. Jeppiz (talk) 19:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Hopefully the warning will do enough. Relist as necessary. GedUK  12:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – UFC fanatics keep removing content just because the article won't be like any other pages about UFC matches. George Ho (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, The discussion is underway, and the reverting of that section(s) seems to have stopped, so I'd be reluctant to protect it at this point. Relist if it starts up again GedUK  12:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 03:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, @Donnowin1: The majority of the IP edits seem to be constructive, or at least not obvious vandalism. Relist with diffs if that's not the case. GedUK  12:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism via fan fiction. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ged UK, why pending changes? This editor is repeatedly adding false information to the article, and is IP-hopping and edit warring while he or she is at it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 12:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Brain fart. Fixed. GedUK  13:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ged UK, LOL. Thank you. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deryck C. 13:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Prisencolin (talk) 12:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Prisencolin (talk) 12:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 22:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two Swiss aviation fans think that every minor detail is notable and are edit warring to keep in in the article. The Banner talk 09:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Editor repeatedly moving it away from standard naming format. Number 57 12:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. GedUK  12:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: For obvious reason. I don't have to explain the reasons. Pending changes will allow IPs to edit this page. Vandals don't come here at high rate but most of the edits are nonconstructive and gets reverted. Last 50 edits tell the tale. . Galaxy Kid (talk) 12:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected. I've revdeled some of the recent edits as well. GedUK  12:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3 months semi-protection: Disruptive editing, the jumping IP from Oxford is back after page protection has ended and violates WP:CIRCULAR and WP:SPS. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - doesn't look like they're jumping around too much anyway, can probably report them to AIV if they continue and get an effective rangeblock if needed Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One user is coming back again and again with IPs to express his love for the actress. 1, 2, 3, 4, . Galaxy Kid (talk) 07:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals will never stop. They mostly go unnoticed. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar. Samsara 11:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Note: I am separately opening up a SPI on this [[62]] as it involves too many IPS. Multiple IPs keep adding in writeups that include "we can see that", "we can establish that ", We can however see quite clearly that", "We should move away from this dichotomy", "We want to bring to light a more complex history", "we would like to present the event". I've tried to discuss this on the talk page, but the IP replied that he/she should be allowed room to "get creative with history" [[63]]. Due to the way these additions are being presented, I am a little dubious of the impartiality of the sourced writeup, so will be trying to get my hands on these books to verify them as well. Just need some time to verify them. . Zhanzhao (talk) 04:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Six months. Alex Rider is a popular spy kid novel . The edit history is full of disruptive editing, though it didn't happen all in one day. Galaxy Kid (talk) 14:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined The rate of incoming vandalism is low enough that PC1 isn't necessary, especially since there's nothing like major BLP concerns involved. Vandalism that does occur can be handled easily enough at this rate with just ordinary rollback. Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated disruption by Morganbutler and other IPs. . Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - plus at least one user is autoconfirmed, so semi wouldn't do it anyway. Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One Month. Religious topic. Slow but continuous vandalism after a gap of few days. Galaxy Kid (talk) 14:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 01:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruption in the last hour or two - being raised in Tasmania, being traded for a tuna sandwich, etc. EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!05:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new accounts blanking sections. Stabila711 (talk) 05:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since protection expired on November 9th, this article has been vandalized consistently. NYBrook098 (talk) 02:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since protection expired an hour ago. PM800 (talk) 02:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; people watch a game on tv and log onto Wikipedia to share their snark. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was earlier protected on 18 Oct and upon expiry, the page is being vandalized again. Kindly protect page again for a longer duration. Thanks. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 12:03, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Persistent vandalism – Continuous disruptive editing and edit warring by removal of sourced content for the past two weeks. 81.132.254.126 (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Elockid Message me 22:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Popular article. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elockid Message me 22:03, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the RPP have been unlocked, this article have been vandalized consistently. Donnie Park (talk) 01:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Serious BLP violations, albeit in good faith, regarding recent media speculation about the subject's health. Chase (talk | contributions) 01:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you locked Kim Zolciak. So Tenebrae is superior and can got the page lock. Why not discuss? Tenebrae said "I have an axe to grind" accusing me of negative things about Kim. I think this is ludicrous that one can make accusations and based on that the page is locked. All that I added was and is sourced from interviews, medical licenses, her show, ROdney Ho, court records, and RHOA. My edits have sources and I explained why they needed to have the information. I disagree with the lock of the page. I feel Tenebrae is trying to alter the page to not have information about Kim that she does not like. She has kids with 3 different men, she does not like that but that is the truth. Tenebre also threatened me so for you all to act in his/her behalf seems bias. I would like for you to look. The edits I made were sourced. I added specific information and when Tenebrae said NO i went backed and added sources, which were then called not good enough but they are. For example, as I stated in my edit summaries the house being bought/rented was a plot line of the show and in the media as Kim gave interviews saying she was being slandered; she threatened to sue Kendra Davis for defamation. So Tenebrae wasnt the rented informationout it is is factual and sourced. What I would like is the page unlocked. I will re add my edits. On the discussion page I will explain. Someone from here please mediate the discussion page so there will be peace. All that I added was sourced. What violated BLP. Tenebrae does not like that I put in the rented house and her kids having different fathers but this is factual and sourced. Tenebra accused me of haivng axe to grind, says I know Kim and do not like her. I think Tenebrae knows Kim and is trying to whitewash the article. Since 2011 Tenebrae has been doing so. If you are close or know or represent or work for the article's subject it is not right for you to edit is a rule. I ask that you reconsider. 173.66.63.102 (talk) 15:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're not bothering to read the pertinent policies you're violating, I'll give you a tutorial based on your edits. You wrote here that:

She claims to have studied nursing at the University of Connecticut; however University of Connecticut grants four year BSN/RN degrees; Zolciak's license is as a LPN, a two year technical school degree.

First, Wikipedia doesn't use accusatory, POV words like "claims". Second, Wikipedia forbids making a POV argument by synthesizing original research. Third, your original research directly contradicts a professional, third-party source, the well-regarded Hartford Courant. The source says she studied nursing at the University of Connecticut; therefore, your removal of the U of CT alumnus category here was inappropriate, as was your edit summary that said, "also we need concrete proof she is a U of Ct alum." No: We need verification from a third-party reliable source, which the Hartford Courant indisputably is.
You say here that her daughters came from two different relationships. But the cited source, a journalistic blog by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, contradicts this: "She was married to a man named Dan Toce from 2001 to 2003 and has two children, presumably his."
As for your claim about "whitewashing," I was the editor who added the information here about her affair, at age 17, with a Hartford police officer. So, no. Wanting to stick with reliably reported facts from journalistic sources and respecting WP:BLP is what we're supposed to do.
I could go over other of your edits, which include disallowed reference citations to personal blogs and tabloid gossip sites, and additionally include medical details that have nothing to do with that for which she is notable. You need to please stop these non-encyclopedic, nonconstructive edits. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Both parties have notified me. I leave it for a second opinion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq

(talk), Sunasuttuq 19:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC) Supervisors, please tell Tenebrae to refrain from posting me. After the threat there is no need to now try and back track. I feel this is happening because in truth tenebrae IS connected to Kim thus the whitewashing.[reply]

As far as the article, the links are legit sources. Tenebrae just does not like it. It is Kim's life. As Nene said, she should have closed her legs to married men ! She had kids with many men, accept it! We do not whitewash Madonna so why is Kim whitewashed.

Cambridge, YOU locked the page. For you to now say you leave it to second opinion, where was the second opinion when you locked the page ? Behaviou liked this shows wikipedia is not a collaborative place. 173.66.63.102 (talk) 20:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected The IP's post above amply demonstrates why the protection is justified. NeilN talk to me 15:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 19:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The most recent edits from IPs don't look like vandalism to me, and it seems the situation has calmed down in terms of bad edits. I've suggested rollback to you so that when vandalism does occur, you have an easier time clearing it up. Samsara 20:42, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - most edits from IP addresses are vandalism. Qpalzmmzlapq (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism after Ireland game tonight. JMHamo (talk) 22:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two Years. Favourite target for kids. Check edit history. Current Pending changes protection unable to stop vandalism. Only wasting time of others. Galaxy Kid (talk) 14:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes is working fine. You're able to see the bad edits because you're logged in. If you log out, you'll only see the latest accepted version. Katietalk 18:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: Speedied four times so far under CSD A7, with increasing frequency. Swpbtalk 21:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Elockid Message me 22:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NawlinWiki. Samsara 22:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. Samsara 22:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs that were also associated with the coordinated vandalism on Lady Colin Campbell. WayfaringWanderer (talk) 21:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elockid Message me 22:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One month. Galaxy Kid (talk) 14:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Likely collateral damage, several IPs contributing positively. Samsara 14:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continuous disruptive changing of information from bouncing IP adding same players who've never played. With tournament long over, page shouldn't be changed. Embele (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated instances of abusive vandalism and editing to include personal information of the article's subject. Christasker85 (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 11:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 64.53.164.248 (talk · contribs) blocked by Samsara. Samsara 13:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

screw you samatar I do what I want!!!!:)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations from unregistered users. Strongjam (talk) 17:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Likely collateral damage given positively contributing IPs. Samsara 13:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: There has been new information released about the incident, and there is discussion going on in the talk pages. As information continues to be released by the Russian government, continued good-faith, but potentially false, edits WILL be made to this page; a buffer might be a good idea and alternative to semi-protection. . ~ Preceding post created by larsona //Talk// 01:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Pending changes protection should not be used on pages with a high edit rate. Likely collatoral damage from semi, with IPs contributing useful content. Samsara 12:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection Continuously created with no success. Anarchyte 10:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Kevin Gorman (talk) 16:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Pages are being redirected (edit warring) without consensus or valid deletion/merge/redirect discussions. As one of the pages has survived an AFD before, unilateral redirects without discussion are not appropriate. (Or any other option that prevents redirects basically) Only in death does duty end (talk) 09:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of One week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kevin Gorman (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reinstate semi-protection: once again, it was lifted, and immediately after lifting, the most insistent SPA who previously kept reverting it reverted it again, of course without any talk page discussion, even though there is a long discussion about the matter, in which these SPAs never took part. Is there a better option than continuing to re-activate page protection? Please direct me to better venues if you think there is one. LjL (talk) 15:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lectonar semi-protected for 1 month. I have blocked the autoconfirmed editor for a week. NeilN talk to me 15:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: High level of vandalism from users, some of which have been auto confirmed such as User:34joey. CLCStudent (talk) 16:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 34joey warned. NeilN talk to me 16:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Content fork of The Game (rapper) with stealth title, created four times in three hours. Norvoid (talk) 16:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Edgar181. NeilN talk to me 16:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The article has been vandalized several times this week by Jajadelera. Pinging the monitoring admin Northamerica1000. Israel's Son 07:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 120.29.65.0/24 rangeblocked for 3 months. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 14:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing content dispute with IP. samtar {t} 14:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: In the last few weeks there has been a sudden upsurge in alterations to the number formatting in the article. This could be due to the release of the new James Bond film, but given the high rate of IP edits it could be sockpuppetry resulting from an ongoing discussion on the talk page. Betty Logan (talk) 04:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or pending changes. Systematic anon changes to major detail by IP hopping editors, apparently one each of Pashtun origin and Balochi origin in disagreement over racial content. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent persistent vandalism IPs and socks. Philip Trueman (talk) 13:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Two creations in 4 years doesn't meet the bar for creation protection for me Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Need response, it's considerably high-risk. Admins please make it full protection. 112.209.86.65 (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The current semi protection is fine. NeilN talk to me 06:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create indefinite full protection: Nakon, request staff that template/article is considered high-risk, make it full protection whatsoever, change from indefinite semi-protection to full-protection. 112.209.86.65 (talk) 06:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remove create protection. I put a note on Spellcast's talk page, but it is not clear whether that editor put the protection in place back in 2008. I have a draft ready at User:Jonesey95/sandbox2. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected by administrator Spellcast. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: As per last time (13 Nov), high level of IP vandalism. Protection expired 17 Nov, disruptive IP editing happened immediately. Request for a longer period this time. Bromley86 (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - only one revert since protection expired - my bar is set a bit higher for talk pages and I'd prefer to wait on this one. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 02:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dr. K. 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The name is very popular. vandals come here often. Pending changes will allow constructive IP edits. Right now the edit history shows vandalism and disruptive editing is getting reverted. Though all disruptive edits didn't occur today. The page must be temporarily semi-protected for two months. Galaxy Kid (talk) 05:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 17:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:RFPP/sandbox|p}} Samsara 18:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Samsara, couple things. The page probably should not have been indefinitely fully protected and I've blocked one of the editors as a sock. --NeilN talk to me 18:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was just waiting for that to happen so that protection could be lifted again. Samsara 18:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Samsara 19:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 02:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 22:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now - heavy editing but most of it looks at least well-meaning if not always constructive. Re-list if situation worsens. AlexiusHoratius 02:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Every CSD template is a wrapper of this one. In fact, I'm a bit shocked that this only has semi-protection. Steel1943 (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 02:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent very high profile death. Many edits, not many of them useful. . Stuartyeates (talk) 02:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article was protected for a month (Oct-Nov '15) because of overly promotional crap being added as well as socking, Well they've returned[64] so IMHO I think indef's best but I'll leave it up to the deciding admin, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 02:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thanks Neil :) –Davey2010Talk 02:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: I'd like to see this page semi-protected for a bit too, as waves of vandalism from multiple IPs were seen on this page just a few hours after the last protection expired. Considering the subject is a living individual, at the very least, I'd like to see pending changes protection in place to hold back the bad-faith edits from public view. Mz7 (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: this article is already on semi-protection but some users like "NotAlpArslan" keep vandalizing the article by changing the data and deleting sources that concern the sections "Total population" and "Regions with significant populations" . Thanks . Tsarisco (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected one week by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 02:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent burst of vandalism from multiple IPs. Something about an "internet sensation"? Likely a meme or a forum joke. Grayfell (talk) 00:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated BLP violations from dynamic IP(s). StAnselm (talk) 00:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Just like the talk page that is Create protected indefinitely. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 01:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston has warned the user. Closing as:
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 17:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – 3 recreates within a month. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 20:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 20:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19 November 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Highly popular subject in school History books. check protection log. Check edit history. Galaxy Kid (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Galaxy Kid (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Note that this is for the redirect. Alakzi (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection – IP hopper adding unsourced and promotional content. --The1337gamer (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Warned user. Will keep an eye on article. NeilN talk to me 14:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism by some users deleting sources, putting senseless informations or deleting informations, and canceling rectified grammar errors...This article have just been put on semi-protection just few days ago but vandalism doesn't seem stop. Thanks.

Edit : I'm sorry I meant the article related to Morocco not Berbers

Declined Current activity does not justify full protection. NeilN talk to me 14:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two times twinkle gave wrong report of "temporary unprotection".--Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi seems more appropriate here, in my opinion MusikAnimal talk 18:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. 37+ cases of vandalism by 9 IPs over the last 2 days. —Laoris (talk) 17:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of content for no reason. JQTriple7 (talk) 10:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or Pending changes Anon sockpuppet of Humza452 Now moved to Sargodha article after Lahore article Protected, See above. Richard Harvey (talk) 13:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Let's see if that works first. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:42, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term Temporary (or Indefinite) semi-protection — This Korean boy-band article appears to be a current favourite for IP vandalism and a previous semi-protection from October expired. Wikierroneous 15:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – current level of pending changes is not helpful. check the edit history. Galaxy Kid (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pining the protecting admin User:NeilN. I think an indef semi is probably worthwhile. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 13:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced edits and vandalism that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 12:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 13:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Majority edits are getting reverted, though all edits were not done today. check the revision history. Galaxy Kid (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or Pending changes Anon sockpuppet of Humza452 persistently flooding article with oversize images. Many of which have been deleted on commons as copyvios. Richard Harvey (talk) 13:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'd like to see how shorter semi protections work. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Firstly don't all BLP's get semi protection? Secondly, this sees almost daily vandalism anyway, so please silver lock it indef. Almost 96% of the edits made by IP's have been reverted here either due to text/vandalism or just plain horsing around. Regards. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 13:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. There are some good edits so I'd like to give pending changes a go first. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 13:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Galaxy Kid (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Check edit history; how many reverts were made and protection log. Galaxy Kid (talk) 08:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Been a year after semi, but there is still significant vandalism, as seen in the history. Can we please have some protection, at least semi?. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 10:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent sock puppetry. An editor creates new accounts and disrupts this article. [65], [66], [67], [68], [69]. Zyma (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Check the huge-huge protection log. Current level of pending changes is not helpful as shows the recent edit history. Galaxy Kid (talk) 12:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Audie Murphy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection This article continues to suffer from "raids" by IP editors who edit entries without bothering to read the notes about the reasons certain entries are what they are. The IPs are NOT helping at all.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 20:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 05:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unsourced IP edits that need reverting. JMHamo (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 05:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Presidential candidate, persisting vandalism expected. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 00:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Katietalk 04:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking. JQTriple7 (talk) 08:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - putting longer on it than I normally would given the volume of vandalism given the topic. When it wears off, come back if it continues to be a problem please, or if you'd prefer it be changed to PC1 or something. Kevin Gorman (talk) 08:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Can the current protection please be extended beyond 21 November 2015 which it is when it's due to end? I am actually confused because yesterday someone without a login was able to edit the page. Not sure if the protection was only added afterwards. Anyhow, as with many pages to do with toilets etc., we get a lot of vandalism on this page. On this page in particular, some people keep insisting on adding vulgar videos of arbitrary persons taking a shit. We already discussed this on the talk page but they don't listen to adivce. EvMsmile (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And even articles such as Pornography, or Nudity. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Let's see what happens after protection expires. I have placed the video on the bad image list. NeilN talk to me 02:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
NeilN, please can you put that in your watchlist and protect whenever necessary? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:33, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwertyxp2000: Yes I will. And yes, you're probably right. I'm surprised it's been more than four years between protections. --NeilN talk to me 02:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full Protection: High level of IP vandalism. User repeatedly adds unsubstantiated and misleading claims, false citations including adding the word "terrorist" to make it appear that the organization has links to terror groups and alleging links to Nazi groups. 50.172.90.241 (talk) 03:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 03:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism for an article that is current TFA. Erick (talk) 06:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant blanking of valid discussion for the past week. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 23:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Djadjko (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 05:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism. There is plenty of disruptive edits in the past 50 edits. They all prove that the article should be semi-ed. Or at least pending change protected. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 04:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DWAD and its talk page

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sixth of March 23:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 05:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Katietalk 05:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Per WP:TPE. Alakzi (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 03:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 01:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for putting this request in, GABHello!! Someone seems to be going crazy on my talk page today after I stepped in to remove a dodgy video from the page about defecation. :-(
Already protected by administrator Diannaa. NeilN talk to me 03:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Too many damaging edits from IPs, could do with semi-protection until it subsides. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 03:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection High levels of vandalism recently Elisfkc (talk) 04:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gfoley4. NeilN talk to me 04:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... No vandalism after recent expiry. NeilN talk to me 04:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism by some users deleting sources, putting senseless informations or deleting informations, and canceling rectified grammar errors...This article have just been put on semi-protection just few days ago but vandalism doesn't seem stop. Thanks. Tsarisco (talk) 01:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Berean Hunter. I full-protected the article yesterday for a week and posted that on the article talk page.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 01:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socks of an extremely disruptive vandal. GABHello! 01:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 02:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Zolciak

Kim Zolciak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I asked Cambridge and no response given.

The page is locked but Tenebrae continues to edit. I feel Tenebrae reported the page so only his her edits would stand. 173.66.63.102 (talk) 18:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done See prior request in Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive NeilN talk to me 19:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The teaser of this movie was released today. Please semi-protect this page for one month. As the full trailer will be released within two weeks. Pending changes protection is wasting editors time. Galaxy Kid (talk) 10:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – This lack of protection for this subpage of the protected template Template:AFC submission appears to be an oversight. This sub-template is widely transcluded (it is used on every AfC submission and then removed after review, so the relatively low current number of transclusions belies its high importance) and there is little utility in making it readily edited. The protection of other sub-templates of Template:AFC submission should also be looked at by an administrator. LukeSurl t c 14:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Swarm 22:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continuous disruptive changing of verified information from bouncing IP adding same players who've never played. With tournament long over, page shouldn't be changed. Embele (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Whenever there is a TV show, Movie, Children's novel, historical event shown on National Geographic/Discovery channel; which is related to/based on Mummy, this page is targeted by vandals. See protection log. There were also disruptive editing. Kids will read this in school books and pay a visit here. Check the edit history. How many reverts were made. Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request semi-protection: persistent vandalism by non-confirmed WP:SPAs. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 21:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner talk 21:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Let's go with Swarm's duration. NeilN talk to me 22:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 15:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP blanking of article . Naoki (talk) 04:58, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like dispute has ended NeilN talk to me 15:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Persistent and recurring target of gross BLP violations, particularly from those who are fed up with the subject's alleged political atrocities. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 15:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High degree of recent vandalism from IP and new users. Drm310 (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 15:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One year semi protection. Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Restored the indef experimentally taken off in August 2015. NeilN talk to me 17:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 17:56, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism. This article is frequently edited, and I would like to cut down the edit traffic by the IPs, since the IPs do nothing but vandalism or disruptive editing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. I don't think there's quite enough recent vandalism to justify any sort of semi-protection; there was a brief increase in frequency recently, but that will probably die down soon. However, the article does seem to be a frequent enough target to merit pending-changes protection. At least readers won't actually see any vandalism, unless a bad reviewer approves it. Biblioworm 16:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 15:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by unregistered users, few (if no) edits made by IP users were constructive. High-risk page. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 15:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nobody's responding at AIV, so taking it here. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection until the current season ends in a couple of months. As often happens with reality-show articles, anon-IP fans enter uncited, purported last names of contestants. In this particular case, they are making claims involving minor children. Three times now in a few days, these WP:BLP vios have had to reverted. Experience shows it will continue as long as the show's season airs. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 40 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I had to use a very unorthodox duration here. Based upon the length of previous seasons (as shown by the table at the top of the article) I estimated the latest date that this season might end and protected the article accordingly (with perhaps a bit of extra time to spare, depending upon when the season ends). Biblioworm 15:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looking at the edit history with so many reverts, pending changes is not working. Galaxy Kid (talk) 04:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Biblioworm 15:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. Persistent vandalism and edit warring. Gamingforfun365 (talk) 06:28, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Indefinite is far from necessary. A week or two of semiprot would be nice to help filter out edit warring from IPs that are changing the reception section to sound more positive. Review scores are still in flux, but the talk page consensus is to follow sources which show a "mixed or average" reception. Multiple IPs change this back to "positive", and do not response to edit summaries or requests to use talk page. -- ferret (talk) 12:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sergecross73. NeilN talk to me 15:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive editing by multiple IPs (adding and/or removing material to promote their own barely notable pageants and/or make mentions of competing equally barely notable pageants less prominent, add utterly non-notable pageants to the list etc, etc...). . Thomas.W talk 09:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And PC 3 months. NeilN talk to me 15:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Appears to have been an infrequent target for "funny vandalism" for quite some time. I doubt there's much good to be found among IP and non-autoconfirmed contributions, so a semi would is perhaps merited, but I'll leave that at the discretion of the protecting admin. . Sam Sailor Talk! 09:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JohnCD. NeilN talk to me 15:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One person seems intent on anti-western slurs with no facts. Not helpful and not true. LordHello1 (talk) 11:05, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Per my message on your user talk page, this is a page where information from IPs can be useful given it is a current event, please report vandalism from IPs to AIV for blocking. Thanks, Thehelpfulone 11:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. DVdm (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:19, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Longterm vandalism by multiple IPs. 101.60.198.93 (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Funny vandalism" continued the day after previous semi expired. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 10:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumed after last protect expired. Dynamic IP socks of 1 chisper (talk · contribs) adding "Alejandro Cuello" to article - bogus credit, likely self-insertion per pattern of these sock accounts. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And PC 3 months NeilN talk to me 15:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection : Persistent vandalism by some individuals who change the sections related to Native languages, Ethnic groups and Official languages by removing citations and informations and replacing them with some totally false or senseless informations without putting citations, canceling modifications made to correct grammar errors and udapte related to the GDP nominal /ppp and per capita. This article is already on semi-protection but vandalism doesn't seem to stop . Tsarisco (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Declined again. Tsarisco, edits you don't agree with are not vandalism NeilN talk to me 22:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WayfaringWanderer (talk) 00:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Article just came off a three-month block in September. Zanhe (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. If the disruptive editing simply resumed after three months of protection, I don't think the situation would improve after the expiration of a longer temporary duration. (Some articles are just magnets for vandalism.) Therefore, I've protected the page indefinitely. Biblioworm 03:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: disruptive IP edits and sock puppetry.  Volunteer Marek  17:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • comment Both editors are warring about an unreferenced item in infobox which is not supported by article text either. Marek, as a long-term editor should know better how to stop edit wars in such cases without admin intervention: prove your point and done with it. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

' Everybody who does not agree with you is a sock puppet, right? Somebody needs to block you, once and for all. --62.157.122.132 (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is intentional "sockpuppetry". It is just this editor does not want to log in. Still, it is edit war to be stopped. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, no activity in 24h.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP disruptive edits, adding false writer names, false sources, false timings etc. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 19:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for the time being, most of the IP edits are constructive. If the situation changes pls re-apply.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: disruptive IP edits. Natg 19 (talk) 19:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 20:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:55, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GABHello! 21:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elockid Message me 22:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edits by COI account evading block. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two different (?) "new" editors are mucking with it; low-traffic article, without semi-protection it will be hard for established editors to avoid falling foul of 3RR. . Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:29, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Socks blocked.) Bishonen | talk 15:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's changing his name. Qed237 (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes: A very popular game with a big online fan base that has resulted in vandalism involving it. I think having Pending Changes to it might help. GamerPro64 19:53, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has been on going for over a month. Some of the vandalism actually remained after further reverts. Semi-Protection is necessary. NeutralhomerTalk03:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC) 03:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent promotional, unsourced and copyright violations. Have requested help at AIV, but it's Friday night. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 12:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 13:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – hoax fork created by sockpuppets four times in 4 weeks: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bobzz1133/Archive. Norvoid (talk) 12:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Deor (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All of the IPs have been unconstructive editing. Even though the last bit of vandalism was yesterday, there still may be more vandalism later tomorrow if not protected. Was semi-ed twice this year in the protection log. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, noticed another revert of vandalism today in the history. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A bunch of IPs most probably the same person restore the same unsupported change. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:17, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. One of them also made the assaulting edit a bio, so clearly is a hate campaign. 01:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constant vandalism especially by IP and new unconfirmed editors. Please block if for at least 6 months or a year.--Satdeep Gill (talkcontribs 07:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NottNott talk|contrib 09:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Benhen1997 00:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 3 days by Materialscientist. tutterMouse (talk) 07:54, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Benhen1997 00:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 24 hours by Materialscientist. tutterMouse (talk) 07:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect for two weeks while the TV show he's on finishes and the high level of vandalism goes away. JMHamo (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 08:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New account vandalism. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 21:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:Tomica and User:Lkaliba edit warring over silly things like which ENGVAR to use. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not edit warring, I am just reverting useless edits which are made by the aforementioned user. However, yes I agree on a protection of the page, because of the lot of IPs vandalizing, adding wrong content etc etc. — Tom(T2ME) 21:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Swarm 23:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by Ararat arev sockpuppets, using several IP addresses. A. Parrot (talk) 02:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And PC 6 months NeilN talk to me 02:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the last 48 hours. Aricialam (talk) 16:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like around 4 bad edits in a week. Come back if it gets worse. John (talk) 21:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two Months. there is a long time spammer who spams Komal Shaiyan in Bollywood movie pages. This user has a chronic problem. He is not going to stop. He did this in other pages also. He edits from a large Ip range. Blocking Ip won't help. This movie will release in December and the movie is being promoted by the producers. I request protection for two months. Galaxy Kid (talk) 09:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. John (talk) 21:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unexplained removal of sources in infobox - <ref name="nytimes.com">{{cite news|title=Electro Music Ambassador's French Touch|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/27/arts/27iht-pedrowinter27.html?pagewanted=all|newspaper=The New York Times}}</ref>|[[Electronic music|electronic]]|[[disco]]<ref name="rollingstone.com">[http://www.rollingstone.com/music/artists/daft-punk/biography ''Rolling Stone'' | Daft Punk biography]</ref>|[[Dance music|dance]]<ref name="nytimes.com">. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 19:47, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. John (talk) 21:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – PC appears to be a waste of time here. Sam Sailor Talk! 19:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 20:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Random information being added on BLP. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 20:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse from sexually-explicit photo vandal. GABHello! 00:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from sexually-explicit photo troll. Please lengthen protection if you feel it is needed. GABHello! 00:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Range of IP vandals both V4 and V6. Amortias (T)(C) 22:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After stating several several times, the 'Fandom' section keeps getting removed without any consensus on the talk section, and then keeps getting restored again. IP editors typically remove the section - is page protection the best course of action?. NottNott talk|contrib 22:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: BLP policy violations. KH-1 (talk) 22:43, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 23:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two Months. IPs coming for disruption. Galaxy Kid (talk) 09:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Okay i haven't corrected the article yet. I just saw IP users changing her Nationality. Creating her death date. Adding her Husband name although she is not married. She is an American actress whose Father is a Pakistani and Mother European. She is acting in Bollywood movies. check the protection log. This vandalism will continue for next 6 years. Some Pakistanis don't like her she has done Bikini photoshoot. Some Indians don't like her as she is of Pakistani origin, yet working in Bollywood movies. There are serious BLP violation on this article. . Galaxy Kid (talk) 16:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This page was brought to by attention over at WP:HELPDESK. There is a high level of SPA accounts editing a page which is currently subject to COI editing, subject has admitted to editing own page, and more. He apparently has brought attention to this page through the platform of his podcast, wanting to craft how is image is represented on WP. Since most of the edits recently are IP or SPA, I'd like a 2 week semi-protect to reduce further edit warring, and possible sockpuppet/meatpuppetry. ukexpat and I have jumpped into help work on this page. Tiggerjay (talk) 16:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I won't decide the time. The page gets vandalized after a gap of few days. The edit history shows many reverts due to disruptive editing by IPs. Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hoppers vandalize this page about once a day usually to say Betty's dead or that she is 300 years old. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 21:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 22:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent edit warring (involving breaking of basic article formatting) by an IPv6 that looks like it was a different IPv6 during the first two edits, so blocking might not do the trick. LjL (talk) 02:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2606:6000:CA80:1600:3C1D:A752:DC00:50CE (talk · contribs) blocked by MSGJ. It seems like there isn't very much IP hopping, so it should be manageable with blocks. If the user starts changing IPs, however, please report the article again. Biblioworm 16:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Repeated vandalism from registered account that has the sole-purpose of editing this page. Bangabandhu (talk) 17:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 17:56, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Absolute meaningless trash and rather frequent. '''tAD''' (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22 November 2015

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism also from some registered users. Singhtalk 06:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism of user page of blocked user account by anon user (suspect sock puppet). Optakeover(Talk) 18:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 21:28, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Being the new defence minister of Canada and a minority the page is constantly edited with the addition of racism and libel remarks. Attempts on his page to label him a terrorist sympathiser have appeared.

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:38, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the third time I'm placing request. Its getting really difficult with the continuous IP cruft and false additions along with the blatant vandalisms. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 19:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 19:10, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Persistent addition of unsourced (or poorly sourced) material to a BLP. Now being restored by a sockpuppet of blocked editor NoCal100 (talk · contribs). 107.10.236.42 (talk) 21:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. You can take your socking concerns to WP:SPI NeilN talk to me 21:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 21:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Yo Cyberbot, yes, I subsequently deleted it. NeilN talk to me 21:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated copyright violations. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year NeilN talk to me 19:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: A newly registered WP:SPA has appeared on this article and edit warring, because he is removing the content that he doesn't like at all.[70] D4iNa4 (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There have been four more reverts since I requested above. D4iNa4 (talk) 18:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 18:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. There's no point in continuing to leave this page open to IPs; the vandalism has been going on continuously for several months now, it was already protected earlier in the year, and I hardly see any constructive edits from IPs. Biblioworm 19:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Too much revert in edit history and old log. The Avengers (talk) 17:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Of the dozens of edits over the past two months, I see virtually no constructive edits from IPs (save two or three, perhaps), but overall I don't think the very rare constructive edits justify leaving the page unprotected. That's why we have edit requests. Biblioworm 18:03, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: To not allowed anonymous users to edit it ! There was more then 10-15 vandalism attacks in last 24 hours. Thank you!--Alexiulian25 (talk) 17:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (for the first article); Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (for the second article). The first one seems to be receiving much more vandalism than the second one, so I've protected it for a longer period. Biblioworm 18:14, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism from a user Wiki4u1234 and several unknown IP addresses – Arunvrparavur (talk) 5:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 18:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism and spam. Optakeover(Talk) 11:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 16:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some editor adds goal he did not score (it was determined as own goal) without any source. Qed237 (talk) 14:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 6 months . EdJohnston (talk) 16:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring dynamic IPs adding fancruft. Dr. K. 15:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 16:25, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page was completely vandalized in November. Pixorial Inc. assets are being bought by LifeLogger Technology Corp. and is subject to SEC approval since LifeLogger is a publicly traded company. It is critically important that we keep this page from being vandalized again during this process. We expect closing conditions to be met no later than May 2016.) E8-andres (talk) 06:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:25, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for 48 hours by Smartse. tutterMouse (talk) 15:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much in last few days. history. The Avengers (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 year. EdJohnston (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protection from IP edits

I removed disparaging remarks about a Madden Mobile user, so requesting protection due to perceived edit war. 65.24.43.157 (talk) 05:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 05:55, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tobias Bergemann (talk) 09:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 09:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the past 150 or so edits, all of the edits were simply just vandalism or reverting vandalism. More vandalism has spiked a bit more in the past two months. It appears that none of the IPs are there to be constructive, only to put the misery into readers with their vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 09:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. NeilN talk to me 05:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:302:D171:A990:DC08:7AC5:E4C0:A9B0 (talk) 04:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 05:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeing repeated deleterious edits by anonymous IPs. Themidget17 (talk) 04:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 05:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 03:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism by multiple IPs (presumably socks of each other...). Mike1901 (talk) 07:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. clpo13(talk) 07:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 07:14, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going disruptive editing by IP's that directly opposes factual information, based on the weekly airing of General Hospital. livelikemusic my talk page! 15:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going edit-warring of disruptive editing by IP's that directly opposes factual information, based on the weekly airing of General Hospital. livelikemusic my talk page! 15:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 02:59, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ararat arev vandalism

Semi-protection: Vandalism from IP socks of Ararat arev. A. Parrot (talk) 04:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:14, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same revisionist trolling. Needs protection for a good while. Crboyer (talk) 04:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Airplaneman. NeilN talk to me 05:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit warring by disruptive IP editors. When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 18:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 19:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Ongoing edit war over days/weeks, please make this a good long time so editors will be forced to discuss. AlbinoFerret 21:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We'll go a week the first time and see if that makes them talk. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – unsourced content being added to BLP. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from same IP range. I like the rationale--apparently a young local tried several times to add his name to the article, without success. Since then he's decided to torch the article. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP attacks over several days. --Snowded TALK 18:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't think a couple of recent reverts is enough to justify protection. Biblioworm 19:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High traffic article. High levels of IP vandalism since temporary semi-protection expired on 10 October. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The page has a long history of being protected, but apparently the vandalism just resumes no matter how long the protection is. Biblioworm 22:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:25, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:29, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Too much disruptive edits so far. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 07:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Okay, I accept all reverts were not done today, but please look at edit history and the percentage of edit reverts. The Avengers (talk) 16:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 16:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IPs are responsible for all the vandalism. The Avengers (talk) 18:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edits against sources from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 19:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I can only see one GedUK  12:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently released show, bringing some disruptive editing to the article. Favre1fan93 (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: For some reason the disruptive editing has increased recently. Honey is very popular. The Avengers (talk) 16:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question?-- When i request for pending changes, why the twinkle adds as "temporaray unprotection". This is third time.--The Avengers (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
MusikAnimal? --NeilN talk to me 16:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh boy. Looking into it! MusikAnimal talk 16:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. clpo13(talk) 16:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. clpo13(talk) 16:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High Level of changes to 'Elect' President, protect until December 10th. Tato1506 Talk to Me 12:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until the 11th, to take timezones into account, just in case. GedUK  13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Cheetah255 (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple usernames DVdm (talk) 14:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JamesBWatson. NeilN talk to me 16:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

indefinite semi protection comes under the ArbCom R&I ruling, never ending target of IPs attempting to WP:EVADE scrutiny. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP vandalism resuming only one week after the end of a one-year semi-protection. DPH1110 (talk) 08:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. '''tAD''' (talk) 12:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by someone swapping IP address in range 67.44.* . KylieTastic (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing unsourced additions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:59, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. WWGB (talk) 06:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Well this is some of what people vandalised - 1 2 3 Cha cha aye. Like bruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhh. Shout out to mr person. He got a hot mixtape it fire. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 06:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The page has been vandalized maybe once or twice in eight years - it's about as close to vandalism-free as you could possibly get. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: From full protection to no protection because it has nothing to to with its redirect target. 🐂Mr. Great Cow (talk · contribs)🐂 22:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No comment on the unprotection request, but the relation between Gay fish and Fishsticks (South Park) is covered in Fishsticks (South Park)#Cultural references. Prodego talk 23:49, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected It has everything to do with its redirect target, and we went through this discussion years ago. Katietalk 02:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. clpo13(talk) 22:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A user who has been blocked four times for edit warring with non-constructive edits at Joker in other media has decided to start doing literally the exact same thing at this article. Upon reverting, other IPs joined in on the edit war and began making the same edits. There have been two attempts to discuss this at Talk:Joker in other media and several on the user's talk page. This user isn't interested in discussion. DarkKnight2149 23:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Dynamic IP editor is constantly including a spam link to this article. Have previously warned _one_ of the IP here; also seem to be targeting this article as well. Mayhaps is prime candidate for spam blacklist but am unfamiliar with that process (ran WHOIS against it and all registration details are blank and bogus anyway). -- dsprc [talk] 00:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

edit: here are rest of offending IPs:

And IPv6 (problematic) in mess as well:

-- dsprc [talk] 00:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. To blacklist an EL, WikiProject Spam is thataway. Katietalk 01:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor using multiple IPs to edit war and push a POV. Tt(talk/contribs) 23:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done- one week by Bbb23 (talk · contribs) Katietalk 01:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Editor using multiple IPs to wheel war, refuses to engage in discussion. Tt(talk/contribs) 23:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request auto-confirmed only. Steady but intermittent stream of editors adding non-notable entries (and presumably themselves, friends or other script kiddies) to list thinking it makes one an elite h4x0rz. Some constructive but vast majority not. -- dsprc [talk] 00:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Editor using multiple IPs to post unsourced derogatory allegations. Tt(talk/contribs) 23:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is consistently targeted by a large number of IP users for vandalism. Since May 2014, of the 500 edits made, 86 edits were reverted and 28 more were "undone", totaling 23% of all edits. In other words, more than 45% of all edits to this article in the time period since May 2014 are either vandals at work or someone undoing the vandals. . — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 00:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. This was a rather difficult call; I was a bit uncomfortable with doing indefinite semi-protection, since the last revert was almost two weeks ago and there have been some constructive IP edits in the past. However, there is no question that it's a frequent vandalism target, so I don't think we should just leave it alone. Therefore, I decided to use the intermediate, less restrictive pending changes. Biblioworm 00:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of either poorly sourced content, or content that is not supported by a reliable source of an awards ceremony happening at the current moment. livelikemusic my talk page! 00:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One week. The Avengers (talk) 00:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With Kyle winning the Cup championship a few minutes ago, the vandals have come out to play. Zappa24Mati 01:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Another Ararat arev sockpuppet. A. Parrot (talk) 01:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 01:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection - Continuous editwarring by several users against talk page consensus. 81.132.254.126 (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One editor has been topic banned and now we have WP:ARBPIA3 to help out. NeilN talk to me 19:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of false information regarding settlement type. John from Idegon (talk) 21:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One week is a bit too short, and two weeks is a bit too long, so I chose the middle number (10 days). Hopefully the disruptive users will lose interest by that time. Biblioworm 22:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Melonkelon (talk) 23:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Another one of those articles where virtually all IP edits are vandalism. I only saw about two constructive IP edits over the past few months. Biblioworm 00:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

24 November 2015

  • Request semi-protection. Repeated insertion of the name of a living individual from different IP addresses. First the edit was unsourced, then the IPs started grabbing random citations from elsewhere in the article, all of which have failed verification. Gamaliel (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. SummerPhDv2.0 20:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP socking/vandalism. . SummerPhDv2.0 20:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – TranslateMason keeps on replacing {{Year article header{{subst:!}}2016}} with a slightly modified header stating that 2016 is the current year. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This user has been blocked indefinitely for abusively using multiple accounts. There was an unblock request was done by an IP recently. Considering that this user was active on India-Pakistan conflict topics and had content disputes with many users on such sensitive matter then it is likely that his talk page will be continuously vandalized for next several years. It will be better to semi it permanently so that there will not be any unnecessary comments by IPs, and anyway, he is blocked permanently for sock puppetry so not much use of his talk page now. Human3015TALK  12:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 16:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A fair bit of vandalism from vandals recently (over the past 2 days). Not sure if it's from the same person, but from my POV this should have autoconfirmed users protection. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 18:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Integers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A series of different IP's (presumably the same person) has been disruptively editing a series of capital punishment articles, including the template. Admin Materialscientist protected some of the articles, but IP's are still hitting this one. Frietjes has attempted to start a discussion on the template's Talk page, but has been ignored. Semiprotection will hopefully force the IP to the discussion table. --IJBall (contribstalk) 16:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: edit-warring blocked user Special:Contributions/75.162.205.14 apparently came back as related Special:Contributions/75.162.210.103 who resumed edit warring. LjL (talk) 17:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several IPs have kept adding the word "incorrectly" to the opening sentence. pʰeːnuːmuː →‎ pʰiːnyːmyː → ‎ɸinimi → ‎fiɲimi 17:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In addition to the hidden message in the article, also consider engaging the anons directly through their talk pages. Samsara 18:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One year. Pending changes is not working. BLP and check revision history. The Avengers (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Contributions dominated by vandalism since 2013. Samsara 18:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is from one IP, so I don't know if page protection is required, or possibly a block of the IP, but figured I'd try for this and have the admin decide. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. This should have gone to AIV really. GedUK  12:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Despite good edits by one IP, other IPs have done edits that end up reverted. George Ho (talk) 05:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I think the edit count is too high for PC at this point, though that may change. And I don't think the IP edits are disruptive enough to warrant semi protection. GedUK  12:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – KING correctly redirects to Monarch presently, may benefit from being disambiguation page as is QUEEN presently,. KING (talk) 07:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, There's only been one change to the redirect in 5 years. Protection is totally unnecessary at this point. GedUK  12:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article was salted. Ever since article has be rewritten with substantial references from various sources in draft Draft:Huccha_Venkat. This articles needs to be unsalted. Rajannamysore (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: From full protection to no protection because it has been thoroughly reformatted and references several reliable sources.Rajannamysore (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should have asked Graeme Bartlett on his talk page, as he is the protecting admin. Since you didn't, I pinged him for you. Katietalk 02:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I requested the article to restored in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Huccha_Venkat_2 I was redirected to this page. I am getting bounced from page to another. Rajannamysore (talk) 04:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but I didn't see your chat on his talk page. So, I have left a message on his talk page. Rajannamysore (talk) 04:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have requested that WP:DRV be the venue for this request, as the article has been voted delete three times. If there is a consensus for allowing the recreation then sure it should be unsalted. At the moment the draft is a bit of a negative BLP, but the community should examine it to override all the earlier deletes. The protection is a continuation of User:JohnCD's protect, as I restored the content for the draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where is anybody reviewing the article? what makes you think the "draft of a negative BLP"??? what do u think abt these articles Osama bin Laden, Umesh Reddy, Dhananjoy Chatterjee, Darbara Singh (murderer), M. Jaishankar, Murder of Hannah Foster, Santosh Madhavan, are these any positive BLP??? If Huccha Venkat is negative BLP, doesn't need to be listed on wiki, then these articles fare less chance than his. Let us start the cleaning process. Can't understand how much politics surrounds in free thinking forum. Every user suggesting to go to a new page to challenge the review. I see many users hoping from article to another, removing end spaces. They call it CONTRIBUTION. When an article is written accurately, there are some people trying to show off the rules. Enjoy the power vested in you. Rajannamysore (talk) 13:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"This is not the place to request an article be unsalted; see WP:Requests for page protection#Current requests for reduction in protection level. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:32, 21 November 2015 (UTC)", "You should have asked Graeme Bartlett on his talk page, as he is the protecting admin. Since you didn't, I pinged him for you. Katietalk 02:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)", "I have requested that WP:DRV be the venue for this request, as the article has been voted delete three times. If there is a consensus for allowing the recreation then sure it should be unsalted. At the moment the draft is a bit of a negative BLP, but the community should examine it to override all the earlier deletes. The protection is a continuation of User:JohnCD's protect, as I restored the content for the draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)". From "Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion" to "Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection" to "Graeme Bartlett on his talk page" to "Wikipedia:Deletion_review", Is there any end to this drama? I see a lot of misinformation floating here. It looks like confusing and redirecting the contributors is a smart way for some people to become important in WP. Rajannamysore (talk) 15:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, Discussion is underway at DRV. If they decide the new version should go in, one of the admins there can move it over, which will delete the salt protection automatically. GedUK  12:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: All IP edits since August (when page protection was last lifted) to this featured article have had to be reverted. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 15:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Indefinitely. Samsara 15:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant waring over Owner/CEO names. (Changes to NE Patriots QB Tom Brady). -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary unprotection: I would say six months should deter any further disruption. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'Semi-protection: Stable highly visible supplemental parent page that only really sees vandal edits. Best to semi-protect I think--Moxy (talk) 00:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of hoaxes by IP socks of TV5Ozamiz. - 112.198.98.217 (talk) 03:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  12:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary upload protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring via uploads in regards to which file should be used. Steel1943 (talk) 15:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Why can't Bond film editors keep the peace? Samsara 15:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple vandalism edits by unregistered users. TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 05:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 23:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see now it was denied here, but this has happened multiple times like [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77]. The last three led to protection, last time. Or perhaps this dynamic IP can be blocked? Qed237 (talk) 23:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Notify the admin, User:Ged UK, that denied request last time. Qed237 (talk) 23:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  11:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent defamatory vandalism by anon IPs. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Musa Talk  10:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP 124.129.23.114. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 00:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 124.129.23.114 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Samsara 01:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – It appears infrequently edited, but there is some recent vandalism. This article also has the protection log of 1-year semi, but there were not many edits during the semi. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 05:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Last protection was semi for 1 year. Samsara 06:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This is Currently place of Vandalism by User:Taiki0409 Sock. - 112.198.98.184 (talk) 05:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The great majority of edits during the last year are IP vandalism or spam. — Gorthian (talk) 00:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see too much recent vandalism (the last instance was three weeks ago); the instances which do occur seem to be infrequent enough to be sufficiently managed with the conventional methods. Biblioworm 01:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editors with multiple addresses (and others) edit warring over the same content: see [78] [79] [80] [81]. LjL (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So why do you war back if you have no idea what are you fighting over?
Can you even post a picture of a Dati person?
Do you know what mitzvahs do Masortim do, that Ultra-Orthodox don't?
Of course not, then why do you edit a page you know nothing about its topic?
Just to spite others, until you get enough undo`s for your 3RR complaint?
Uneducated behavior it is.
"Let me be very clear: I'm far from an expert in this article's topic." / LjL
You just admitted that in Talk:Religion in Israel. 79.178.140.27 (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Socking. NeilN talk to me 04:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – significant vandalism from IPs over past two days. WayfaringWanderer (talk) 04:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by blocked IP editor. See WP:ANI#Misc desk question repeatedly removed in error. Tevildo (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elockid Message me 23:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: High level of annoying vandalism. Might only be stoppable by permanently protecting it.🐂Mr. Great Cow (talk · contribs)🐂 23:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Samsara 01:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediate resumption IP socks adding same bogus info. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Attempts to remove unverified and nonsensical listings has resulted in blatant reversions without discussions. The topic is subject to ARBCOM sanctions due to a decade-long problem with sock and meatpuppetry. I'm an admin but I'd prefer that people actually use the talk page rather than fighting these characters and will then do it via an edit request than continue this game. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Long-term semiprotection can be warranted as well, but technically can only be imposed after the full protection expires.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection - Continuous editwarring by removal of sourced content by several users whilst discussion and consensus is ongoing on talk page. 81.132.254.126 (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Past socks have been blocked, no new editors can edit WP:ARBPIA3 articles so let's see what happens. NeilN talk to me 18:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs, block evasion by a rather nasty piece of work, from the looks of it. 73.159.24.89 (talk) 21:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 month NeilN talk to me 22:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

25 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP user has turned to posting same BLP violations on talk page now that the article is semi-protected. Strongjam (talk) 17:27, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 17:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Article keeps changing - and changing the names of staff to rude and unfriendly names. Berksenterprisegeek (talk) 21:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the past 3 days, high amounts of vandalism have occurred by IPs. Thanks. . In veritas (talk) 21:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandals, some IP and others with logins. LizardJr8 (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Edgar181. Samsara 20:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated nn autobio, speedied four times. Gjon Karrica has already been salted after five speedy deletions. --Finngall talk 20:27, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Biblioworm 20:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism for some unknown reason. JMHamo (talk) 20:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most IP edits are getting reverted and check the protection log. The Avengers (talk) 15:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. While it is a long-term target, it works out as less than one incident a week atm. Different IPs also made constructive edits on 19 and 23 Oct. Watchlisting. Samsara 15:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Biblioworm 18:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again, large amount vandalism from various IPs. Kinetic37 (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I was about to say this but Kinetic got ahead of me. VERY needed. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 18:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi. Samsara 19:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi. Samsara 19:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of the Hearthstone player vandals. clpo13(talk) 18:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Samsara 20:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: This page is subject to a low but consistent level of drive-by editing, not necessarily malicious in nature, but disruptive in effect; witness just the last month of editing history, which contain ten reverts. Given that it is an important and frequently visited page, these introduced errors are visible to a substantive number of people before they are corrected. Therefore pending changes protection seems appropriate. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. I also semi-protected the page for 3 days, since there was a period of rapid vandalism from different IPs yesterday. Biblioworm 19:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring IPs. -- samtar whisper 19:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NeilN. Samsara 20:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP being disruptive/edit warring despite attempts at communication. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 12:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  13:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalistic IP edits. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – large amount of vandalism from various IPs. Kinetic37 (talk) 18:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is very needed. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 18:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:17, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term disruption by a repeatedly blocked IP-hopper (who posts phone numbers in edit summaries and claims to be a "paid Obama censor"). Xenophrenic (talk) 14:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP user is evading previous blocks. Samsara 15:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This time administrators will agree with me due to many recent reverts and this. The Avengers (talk) 16:27, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mostly reverts. Not sure, but there is this and this. The Avengers (talk) 17:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resumption of disruptive editing from IP's following the latest removal of protection. Continued addition of original research, which is not supported by reliable sources, as well changed made in violate of the MOS and {{Infobox television}}. livelikemusic my talk page! 03:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm having trouble following your reasoning from recent edits. It looks like the IPs made some rearrangements and fixed a spelling mistake (which you reverted). I don't think it qualifies as vandalism. Samsara 03:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The rearrangements violate the ibox linked above and the MOS of TV, which is one of the issues that lead to the page's previous protection.
I'm not familiar with the show, nor do I know which part of the MOS you think is violated. The only problem I can trace to the taxobox is the insertion of a blank line, which is not sufficient reason for protecting a page. Samsara 04:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 08:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP spamming of late.  Ohc ¡digame! 08:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 08:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent image vandalism. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious case. The Avengers (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two instances of vandalism during the past week. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 06:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Kids. The Avengers (talk) 06:04, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one instance of vandalism (and two edits overall) during the past week. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 06:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I find the numbers-vandalism hard to evaluate, so this is in good faith. Samsara 10:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring between IP user and HotWiki. Patterns of this shown in the past on this article. JQTriple7 (talk) 08:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Activity isn't frequent enough to protect the page. Notify the involved parties of an edit war if they keep this up and try to establish discussion on the talk page. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 05:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Back in the news due to a press release. Due to the BLP concerns, can we semi-protect for two weeks?. VQuakr (talk) 07:36, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic history here. VQuakr (talk) 07:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@VQuakr: Have there been any recent BLP violations? Samsara 07:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Diff 692113645 would be an example. VQuakr (talk) 08:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Got an IP making extreme changes to the article introducing unsourced & dubious text, repeatedly and without discussion. Alexbrn (talk) 08:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:14, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals/test editors returned with vengeance as soon as the last protection expired. Needs much longer protection. Zanhe (talk) 09:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Beginning of a world war as it dubiously is, there have been a bunch of IP removals/warring reverted by multiples established editors. requesting about 48 hours for now.Lihaas (talk) 04:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 05:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This game is newly released and has broken records. [82]. The Avengers (talk) 05:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 05:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Reverts , reverts and reverts. Check Protection and pending changes log. Popular topic. The Avengers (talk) 06:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All edits this month have been Vandalism or the reversion thereof. SMP0328. (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 00:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Regular IP vandalism of biography of living person. Martel10732 (talk) 00:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 01:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 05:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of blatant hoaxes by IPs. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, along with multiple MOS violations. – Pretty much every edit by a newly registered or anonymous editor since 8 November, when I last made edits that corrected various violations of the MOS including, but not limited to, MOS:BOLD, MOS:ACCESS, MOS:DTT, MOS:CAPS and WP:REFPUNCT, has been unsourced or reinstated MOS violations. I'm making more corrections now, and did last night but, as I write, more unsourced changes are being made. AussieLegend () 03:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: The IP user 188.32.104.125 keeps on reverting others' changes to this sandbox page. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined GeoffreyT2000, it's the sandbox. If the editor is disruptive then please warn them. NeilN talk to me 17:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
HighInBC has talked to the user, so I'm guessing the situation is under control. Samsara 17:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is an active vandal. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 21:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continued immediately after protection expired. Qed237 (talk) 22:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 00:01, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – on all levels, more recently with band members. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of new user & IP vandalism relative to legit edits. Page is not edited very often, but when it is edited, an unusually large proportion of edits from new & IP users turns out to be vandalism. KDS4444Talk 00:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP violations by IP editors. A view of the public logs for the page shows that this article has suffered from persistent vandalism and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

26 November 2015

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 17:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, multiple IPs in the last few weeks. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. One specific user keeps removing infobox, poster, etc. TropicAces (talk) 19:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User Typ932 has instigated an edit war as per Talk Page (which refers to dispute escalated to Project page), without basis or logic and disregard for Talk page discussions and edit war warning to Typ932 on his Talk page. My changes have been done to enhance or update content and restore the integrity of the article also by removing any ambiguity (in particular, by adding or revising appropriate and reliable references, as needed). CtrlXctrlV (talk) 04:42, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. CtrlXctrlV, both you and Typ932 need to stop edit warring. NeilN talk to me 07:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This template does no longer seem to be widely used - less than 250 transclusions to be counted, thus rendering the full protection redundant. . Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quadell is the protecting admin. He seems to be sporadically active. I'd suggest leaving him a message, just in case. Samsara 16:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, If you don't get an answer from @Quadell:, relist or let me know and I'll sort it. GedUK  13:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Akhtar Raza Khan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unprotection: The title is protected from creation.I have made a draft (Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan).I talked with the protecting admin but he is not in the mood of requesting my request.He even deleted talk page of the title where I had placed 'Edit protected' templete.

Morever my draft is rejected several time from review.I am trying since 4 months.I think there is some hidden agenda.You can see the talk page of the draft.

You may unprotect and then the newly created article could be taged semi-protected for saving it from copyright violationEjaz92 (talk) 11:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, This version of the draft hasn't been accepted or rejected, moving it to the mainspace at this point seems a bit premature. GedUK  13:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: This page doesn't have much edit history, but for some reason maximum IP edits were reverted, though all edits were not made recently. The Avengers (talk) 12:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  13:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 12:32, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  13:19, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – There were three recent deletion log entries. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:35, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection

This article has been protected for over two years. The protecting administrator has two talk pages. On one the request was made three months ago and is still sitting there. On the other it was made two days ago and has already been archived. 188.222.58.239 (talk) 14:35, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:05, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Too much IP disruption and one libel edit, one vandalism and one unsourced. . Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 08:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Lectonar.. GedUK  13:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 09:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too soon to go indef, this is the first protection. GedUK  13:05, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent long term vandalism by multiple accounts. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 09:50, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi for a week or so, to fend off recurring trolls for a week or so. And while you're at it, protect the other ref desk pages likewise. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots11:47, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The "Black Brutality" vandal seems to have stopped for the moment (although he may be back this afternoon), and we seemed to manage him manually this morning with no serious problems (although it makes the page history a bit messy). That being said, I can see the case for locking down the Misc desk for a longer period. However, there hasn't been any similar vandalism on the other desks recently, and I don't think we need to lock them. Tevildo (talk) 12:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – From different IPs vandalism. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 12:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feels like a drive by GedUK  13:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive Ip increased recently. popular article. The Avengers (talk) 12:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:18, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent BLP violations, slanderous content added by anonymous users -see page history. UserK (talk) 02:40, 26 November 2015 (UTC) 5:46, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not justified. NeilN talk to me 07:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how this works out NeilN talk to me 07:53, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: One day protection only. Appeared today in google doodle for google India

https://www.google.co.in/. The Avengers (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Good call. NeilN talk to me 07:13, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent BLP violations, slanderous, false content added by anonymous user -see page history. This anonymous user has been tracked as an individual (name withheld) who is the subject of a criminal investigation in the States of NY, CA and FL as well as FINMA and the Swiss authorities. We request the anonymous editor user be required to reveal their identity and cease vandalizing the page.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And pending changes protected 3 months NeilN talk to me 07:18, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent promotional intent by multiple accounts, one of which has been blocked. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:03, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Users continuing to edit war over inclusion of a {{POV}} tag and refusing to discuss on the talk page, after previous full protection for this same issue was lifted. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Let me know if anyone else continues to be problematic on that page. Swarm 03:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 05:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 54 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – see page history. Natuur12 (talk) 01:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 03:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent BLP violations, defamatory content added by multiple accounts continuing after expiration of last page protection. JNW (talk) 02:40, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Blocking all the accounts who have vandalized that page per WP:VOA/WP:NOTHERE. Swarm 03:05, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:26, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:03, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long term IP edit warring on cdrtools/cdrkit/libburnia

Infinite semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring. Please add semi protection to the named articles.

There is a group of IP addresses from the Munic area and a named user from the same area that try to add false claims or links/citations to false claims from other people in order to harm cdrtools. The Munic IP addresses are active since many years and last year, there have been several alternative IP/user edits with only a few minutes time difference.

Since nearly three months, there is another group of IP (v4 + v6) addresses from the Oslo area and a named user from the same area that does similar edits.

Please add an infinite semi protection as the harmful activities exist since more than 5 years. Schily (talk) 13:17, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Schily: This sounds like a dispute. Usually we'd require evidence that you've tried to resolve the issues with the other side an they haven't responded or there has been some consensus/admin decision as to what should happen. Alternatively, have you documented what sources they want to insert and why these aren't reliable? Samsara 15:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
They are inserting various things. It seems they are careful with not always trying to do the same. There is however a common sense in all edits: trying to harm an OSS project and editing with alternating credentials (IP/user) where the more harmful edits are done via IP access. I have tried to find a solution for this problem since more than 5 years. I collected a long list if IP edits and user edits but if I would violate the WP rule "not outing" if I send this to a WP list. It seems these people or this person knows about this problem. BTW: the person from Munic uses WP just as one of several ways to spread libel against Cdrtools, I have a list of other attacks as well. As it is obvious that this person does most of his attacks anonymously, I am sure that a semi protection could help. You are however welcome to present a better solution. Schily (talk) 15:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not asking for an outing. Right now, this is a "word against word" situation. I need a good reason if there's going to be any sort of protection on these articles. Everything I've read so far suggests this is a simple dispute (or set of disputes) and should go to dispute resolution. Samsara 16:36, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This dispute solution was already tried out, but the result was that the person who should be the judge more or less replied something like: "I don't like to read so much information to understand who is correct". The problem with the edits I have in mind is that they are done in a way that looks correct as long as you don't check whether the given sources verify the claim that was made in the article and as long as you don't verify whether the given source is reliable. Today, I removed text that claimed (together with a citation) "these ioctls have been added to the Linux kernel just for cdrecord", but the ioctls in question exist in Linux since April 1993 and cdrecord was ported to Linux in July 1997, which is more than 4 years later and disproves the claim. So there is a general system behind the edits: Add something that looks OK as long as you are not a specialist for the topic and as long as you don't take a lot of time to verify the claims. For the topic cdrtools there is a lot of false claims in the net and if you like to prove or disprove a single claim, you need to check the timeline because the timeline is information that is hard to fake. There are however few people who like to do the work of checking the time line... Schily (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide links to relevant previous discussions. Also, if reliable sources make false claims, there is nothing we can do. There are no 100% accurate sources, and we unfortunately have to suck it up. Samsara 17:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A source that made more than one false claim cannot be seen as a reliable source anymore. The previous attempts have been done long ago, I need to check how to find pointers. Schily (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 21:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Schily is the author of cdrtools, and sees the other two cd writing programs as rip-off of his work and his enemys. He wants to remove all criticue of cdrecord (here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cdrtools&diff=prev&oldid=692395898 he removes that Linus Torvalds says the SCSI LUN naming scheme of cdrecord is meaningless - with source) and all features that the other programs have (here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cdrkit&diff=prev&oldid=692399337 he removes the cdrkit feature that non-root can burn in 99% of cases.) Who is biased? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.52.38.21 (talk) 21:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent copyright violations and other unconstructive edits made by IP users.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has required virtually constant semi-protection, with disruptive editing resuming as soon as protection expires. Semi may not totally solve the problem, since some of the problem editing is coming from autoconfirmed editors, but it should help. MelanieN (talk) 00:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – page has been repeatedly targeted by IP socks of Maelbros. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 22:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

27 November 2015

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There's been edit warring on this page based on a content dispute. I'm guilty of one or two of the reversions myself. Perhaps we should shut down editing for a few days to encourage talk page discussion. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous protection (by Callanecc) for one week was apparently not effective - further administrative guidance might be needed to bring this process to a conclusion. AfD seems to already be going towards a clear result, so hopefully unaffected by this measure. Samsara 20:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone (multiple editors though) has been changing this to "chonce" and adding "Niall Horton" for well over a month now, unnoticed for quite a while too!. Stephenb (Talk) 19:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Even with pending changes, page is still being targeted by IP vandals, including a few Maelbros socks. Vandalism has increased in frequency back in October, and doesn't seem to be slowing down by much. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 20:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 2 years. NeilN talk to me 21:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: The amount of constant long-term vandalism trend within the pending changes time should prove a renew in pending changes. Is currently pending changed from long-term vandalism trend. Please renew pending changes. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 06:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Next time, please post it shortly before the expiration time, it would be more efficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:21, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What was done. NeilN talk to me 17:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – People tend to challenge the current name. Right now there is the RM that bounds to fail this time. George Ho (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho: From the log, it looks like the move vandalism is quite old. Has there been recent move warring? Keep in mind that protection should generally not be used pre-emptively. I'd be more willing to consider long term move protection after the current request has been closed, since it's clear there has been repeated interest in moving this page to a variety of destinations. Unless, that is, you can show that it's been warred over recently, in which case temporary protection would make sense - I looked at this log, which shows no move vandalism since 2008. Samsara 18:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite perhaps? The RM is gonna fail anyway regardless of the time of closure. --George Ho (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected indefinitely. I didn't see this discussion, because it apparently started after I had gone to the page and started configuring the protection settings. My reasoning is that there have been many, many RMs and none succeed, so the consensus seems to be that the page should stay at its current title. The policy says that pages can be move protected if there's a naming dispute, and there is a perpetual naming dispute on this page. Biblioworm 18:30, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Lots of fans of a TV series involving this character are persistently adding unsourced content. Please protect the article for a few months: he'll hopefully be killed off by then. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 18:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing content dispute, new socks being created to edit war. -- samtar whisper 09:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Further vandalism and sock editing -- samtar whisper 16:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: edit warring by IP editors and editors with less than 500 edits, which is not allowed per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_3#General_Prohibition. When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 15:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:30, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – repeated addition of unsourced content by penetrant IPs + violation of Flagcruft policy. Denniss (talk) 16:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 60 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by an IP. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly visible template – Very highly visible template. . Eteethan (talk) 05:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 14:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: One month. Many unrelated IPs are coming to add an unsourced claim that an actot Prabhjyot Singh is part of the film. The way things happen in Bollywood articles, i won't be surprised if it's Prabhjyot Singh himself.The Avengers 08:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users and IPs vandalism. Even a day could be helpful. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 11:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JohnCD. NeilN talk to me 14:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 14:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes previously applied, infrequently edited article, very recent vandalism, not many edits other than the vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 06:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 7 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very huge amount of edits of only vandalism, was previously semi-ed many many times, recent test edit. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 06:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Past one month all IPs are disruptive. highly popular page. The Avengers 09:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Inexperienced editor keeps moving this page hither and yon. I have asked them to stop then warned them, but they seem unable to understand. This may be a language issue. There is a whole trail of redirects now, that I am relying on the bot to tidy. Fiddle Faddle 10:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (tJosve05a (c) 16:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Between the current edit war with a single anon, to the frequent vandalism, this has gotten completely out of hand. As a matter of fact, just before I filed this report, a user created a brand new account specifically to vandalise this article. That user isn't the first to plague the article with blatant vandalism either. DarkKnight2149 06:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:37, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism from IPs and some new users. Another recent vandalism. Vandals may also get attracted to "methane" as "the smelly gas" (which ironically enough is not methane, which ammonia is). Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 06:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Obviously destructive, and not constructive editing by one user.[84] please the protection of the article because this user continued mass removal of sourced content.--Inception2010 (talk) 15:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: And Tin foil hat. Persistent Socks. . The Avengers 23:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: ZarathustraTheGodless (talk · contribs) blocked by NeilN. Samsara 23:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much recent vandal activity. Finally caught some very recent high level vandalism. None of the IPs are helpful within the last two months, which has been done in the last 100 or so edits. Though there was one minor constructive edit by an IP, it was not very much. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 02:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:37, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Fixed, was wrong protection level. Samsara 04:37, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Long-term but persistant vandalism. It appears that it is usually new editors and IPs are "bombing" the article with removal of content and other random stuff. Has always been targetted in the past. Weaponry is usually one of the targets of vandalism. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 03:01, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Serious recent BLP violations and defamation. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That article's history is pock-marked like a WWI battleground. Samsara 04:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Martinian Leave a message! 19:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 01:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Viriditas (talk) 01:18, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: my user page is undergoing a little bit of IP vandalism, and they hop fast, so this might be easier than repeated reports-and-blocks on AIV. LjL (talk) 02:04, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Let me know if you want an expiry date set. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Multiple IPs (two today, one a couple of days ago) changing the subject's gender pronouns, contrary to Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Gender_identity. McGeddon (talk) 18:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:40, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Martinian Leave a message! 19:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 21:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Feel like it's just a drive by, but vandalism from different IPs. Could use autoconfirmed protection for a day or two. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 23:50, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing fancruft additions to sales. Previous semi-protection was for 6 months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous semi was quite a while ago. Samsara 23:35, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of European countries by average wage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, which is difficult to identify as vandalism because it involves changing statistics which must be verified. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 18:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In good faith - I'm assuming *all* the recent IP edits fall into the category you mentioned. Samsara 23:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a vandalism magnet. Please increase protection from Pending-Changes to Semi-Protection. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 21:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded - Pending changes is simply not working on this article - Arjayay (talk) 22:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandals seem to be targeting ancient Egyptian articles with unsubstantiated claims about the pyramids having been built 12,000 years ago. This one's being hit too. /wia /tlk 22:42, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mkdw. Samsara 23:18, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP fans of the Big Bang Theory sitcom are still noodling the opening sentence to match the dialogue of a recent episode that referenced a grammatical mistake in this Wikipedia article (including some restoring the mistake, I guess to make the episode "true" again). McGeddon (talk) 22:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and BLP violations, which in some cases stayed on the article for several hours before I removed them. A view of the public logs also shows this article has suffered previously with vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 22:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:05, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A series of new accounts are edit warring to add a copyvio example to the article. Added 8 times by 4 different accounts. Material is copyvio [85] . Meters (talk) 23:05, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Saladin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I've watched the article for years, and every single month, year in and year out, some IPs will change the nationality to their own POV, disregarding the sources. Given the fame of the subject, and the neverending IP vandalism, I'd suggest an indef semi-protection, as this issue will not go away. Jeppiz (talk) 17:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 21:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be an uptick on vandalism on this article. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resuming shortly after last protection expired. Also a high traffic page. Mz7 (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated added of unsourced content by different IP's. Azealia911 talk 21:26, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 22:17, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

28 November 2015

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  15:30, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Biblioworm 16:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salt the earth; repeatedly recreated. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:37, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 18:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Few weeks ago i might have requested protection, which was perhaps rejected. The Avengers 17:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

indefinite semi protection, or PP changes Persistent anon edit warring, from IP intent on removing reliably sourced detail for personal view. Richard Harvey (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:57, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently under persistent vandalism . KylieTastic (talk) 19:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 60 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flappychappy (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. College football coach who is mentioned for a couple of openings. Please protect for 2-3 days to prevent IPs from adding unsourced rumors, per WP:CRYSTAL. --bender235 (talk) 19:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or pending changes: Consistent long-term warring/disruption by IP-hopper. wp:ARBPIA3 related.--TMCk (talk) 15:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Content dispute/removal of content started again by IP straight after previous protection expired. -- samtar whisper 17:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Some IPs have been vandalizing the tracklist and nothing has been done to block those who continue to vandalize the page. LuigiYoshiU (talk) 17:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 17:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The1337gamer (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 16:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of disputed data. Onel5969 TT me 16:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IPs have been vandalizing the page lately, and this has been a problem for longer. Zappa24Mati 16:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. The page seems to be a perpetual target for vandalism, but not quite frequent enough for semi-protection. Biblioworm 16:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Talk:Laci Green. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:36, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced material. IPs are repeatedly adding the number of episodes for the fourth season and ignoring the hidden note that it requires a source. Amaury (talk) 16:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:57, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous spamming. Jevansen (talk) 11:14, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected by Kudpung for 1 month. tutterMouse (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content inspired by a TV series currently being aired; please review extended history and consider a length term of protection. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 13:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The page has always seemed to be a popular vandalism target, so I've protected it indefinitely. Biblioworm 16:36, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism of BLP by unregistered editors. ElKevbo (talk) 13:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 16:39, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – penetrant IP continuing to add unsourced content, a claim not supported by serious researchers. Denniss (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Denniss: Have you discussed this issue with the user? Samsara 17:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The content was completely unsourced and the editor was IP hopping. Therefore, I think a short half-week semi-protection is justified here; hopefully, three days will be enough for the IP to lose interest in adding the unsourced content. Biblioworm 06:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism . Amortias (T)(C) 23:37, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of unref'd WP:OR and link to WP:COPYVIO vid per WP:YOUTUBE.

AldezD (talk) 03:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AldezD (talk) 03:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP, same geo location, adding vastly unrelated content to the article. Been going on now for a few months, sometimes doesn't get caught right away. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: It has been a while since issues have popped up on this page; however, from time to time it's experienced annon users that build up, WP:Peacock, WP:Resume, WP:CITEKILL this article subject. BarkeepChat/$ 06:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One or more IP editors have persistently attempted to remove sourced material over the last few days. I am One of Many (talk) 07:46, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by different IPs by adding a meme to the description of the character 'Roy'.

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - Continuous editwarring by removal of sourced content from IPs and anonymous users. 81.132.254.126 (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I second the request. It's being a bit of an unholy mess. LjL (talk) 01:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Slakr.. Biblioworm 06:39, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 01:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The vandalism seems to have died down somewhat, but I prefer to be safe and protect it for a little while. We should be especially cautious with BLPs. Biblioworm 06:14, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page is subject to a low but consistent level of drive-by editing, not necessarily malicious in nature, but disruptive in effect. Just the last two weeks of editing history contain eight reverts. Given that it is an important and frequently visited page, these introduced errors are visible to a substantive number of people before they are corrected. Therefore pending changes protection seems appropriate. PC was tried previously for six months, and the pattern resumed thereafter, so longer protection might be helpful. . Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In light of the recent vandalism, I think temporary semi-protection is merited. Biblioworm 06:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Biblioworm 06:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent vandalism; Continuous disruptive change/addition of wrong & unnecessary information.Jambarienterprises (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 01:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Though some IPs were disruptive, there were some that appeared helpful. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:24, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 06:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Biblioworm 06:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Creating Articles which is all advertising (G11) and i don't want anymore recreated from now. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 01:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done No need, the user has been blocked. Bishonen | talk 02:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection just expired, but the offending block-evading editor immediately resumed: compare [86] with blocked user's [87], then also [88] and [89]. LjL (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The block has expired NeilN talk to me 01:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism by IP's; adding in original research that violates the crystal-ball policy and does not cite any kind of reliable source. livelikemusic my talk page! 03:12, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:15, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 9 days, 42 intermediate revisions by 23 users and only one useful edit. For a low level page this is a lot of vandalism... EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:43, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

indef semied as perennial problem. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator Casliber. NeilN talk to me 04:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Several new single-purpose accounts and IPs are edit-warring at the newly created BLP Prashant Kishor, restoring a poorly written, formatted and sourced version that is chock full of the users' personal opinion. Could an admin please take a look at this and maybe put some sort of lock on the article for a short period?—indopug (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unexplained repetition of a change which contradicts the cited source. Looks like the same person using three different IP numbers. Apuldram (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 00:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same problem as before. An IP won't stop trying to reinsert inappropriate content. DanielRigal (talk) 00:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 00:54, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of cited biographical information from bouncing IP addresses (but appears may be the same person since the vandalism is always the same?) Jooojay (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 01:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continuous disruptive changing of information from bouncing IP adding same players who've never played. Embele (talk) 21:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 21:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 21:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – no sign of notability and repeatedly recreated. Amortias (T)(C) 23:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 23:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Amortias (T)(C) 23:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

29 November 2015

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page should be indefinitely semi-protected because of POV pushing (part of India-Pakistan conflicts). Kautilya3 (talk) 11:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., clear material for pending changes, since IP edits are infrequent.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from one or more unregistered editors. ElKevbo (talk) 19:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Biblioworm 19:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from one or more unregistered editors. Taffe316 (talk) 19:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 66 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Check all the recent edits made by new users and IP. The Avengers 14:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism. (Since its very beginning, the article has been vandalized by bedroom witch house producers trying to promote their non-notable music projects.) Myxomatosis57 (talk) 17:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 18:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – The page is being targeted for repeated moves by a new editor who is an auto confirmed editor but who has, so far, refused to engage in discussion and moves the page against naming conventions. Ideal protection level is to prevent moves for the medium term future until that editor can be given a clear understanding that behaviour like this is unacceptable. A WP:AIV report has been made, but a couple of ¢ of prevention is worth a $ of blocking an editor if we do not have to. Fiddle Faddle 17:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done one week on November 27 by Ymblanter. Katietalk 18:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Rumors of dismissal are floating around, and various IPs continue to add it, but of course per WP:CRYSTAL, we do not include rumors. Please semi-protect for 2-3 days. --bender235 (talk) 18:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP-hopping personal attacks. NebY (talk) 14:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism edits by highly dynamic IPv6. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sock vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent IP edit warring over lede exceeding one week in duration. Worldbruce (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I logged it as "disruptive editing" because while it's a dispute, the insertion is also upsetting the grammar of the sentence and could be considered vandalism. "Disruptive" seemed to encapsulate both possibilities. Samsara 17:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I have already reported the IP to AIV but until that report is acted on it would be nice for an hour a so of protection so I can edit other articles. MarnetteD|Talk 21:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 07:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A lot of vandalism by IP editors in recent days. A view of the public logs also shows that this article has been the subject of persistent vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 07:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – New users and IPs coming in to edit due to recent news coverage. Need a cool down period. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?action=view&page=World_Trade_Center&type=protect. The Avengers 17:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

semi protection Talk page is being used for a frivolous proposed move, all the supporters are 'new' users. Strong suspicions it is the original proposer who previously moved the page. Red Jay (talk) 18:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It is best to let the RM run its course. I see little policy based arguments and it would be better in the long run to be able to point to a discussion with consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting brief semi to foster discussion. I've converted gross values to condensed values per MOS:LARGENUM and existing WikiProject Film norms. (Please note Template:Infobox film and how gross values are suggested to be treated in the film infobox). Various users refuse to participate in discussion on the matter. My discussion has been open for several days and my argument is that community consensus already exists for shorter values. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:27, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP, a short semi-protect might be warranted, the IP's conduct is currently under discussion elsewhere. Safiel (talk) 20:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repetition of recreation of the article after it was previously redirected because it failed WP:NMUSIC. IPadPerson (talk) 20:36, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 03:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

semi protection IP disruption. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – POV edit warring over the flag. The Banner talk 17:55, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined hold on this for the time being as some discussion appears to be taking place. Bring back here pronto if breaks down again. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Some edit war regarding aliens. see Talk:Falun_Gong#NEUTRALITY.3B_omission_of_controversial_teachings_in_main_page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:03, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many IP users keep on adding inappropriate content, as well as removing content such as files. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:43, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Magioladitis. Samsara 02:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The movie released Yesterday and IPs have began editing tests which are time wasting as we have to check those edits. The Avengers 10:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for the time being it looks like edits of registered long-time users are reverted more often than IP edits. Many IP edits are good.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Musa Talk  11:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for the time being pending changes are sufficient--Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal has either left the building or is close to being blocked soon. Samsara 20:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Jhon Flannogun (talk · contribs) blocked by NeilN. Samsara 20:43, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  20:34, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Hopping IP has inserted repeatedly tendentious claims about Ehrman, possibly has committed WP:BLP violations. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:29, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Maelbros sock using this IP talkpage to write hoax articles while blocked on this IP. Not using page to request unblocks or any other valid purpose. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:03, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. NeilN talk to me 18:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

indefinite semi protection, or PP changes Persistent anon disruptive edits and edit warring, from IP hopping sockpuppeteer. Richard Harvey (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done pending changes will be a headache to check. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by User:Imtitanium. Psychonaut (talk) 21:29, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done best that everyone have an account here. perennial problem Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:37, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by User:Imtitanium. Psychonaut (talk) 21:30, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done best that everyone have an account here. perennial problem Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Article is vandalised on a regular basis. DarkKnight2149 22:03, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:40, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

James Deen & Stoya

Temporary semi-protection: Both pages being edited based on unverified statements Stoya made on Twitter a few hours ago. JamesG5 (talk) 22:57, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how this plays out. Agree we need to err on side of caution. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

30 November 2015

Semi-protection: Vandalism and hoaxing – After its last protection expired an editor changed it back into a hoax article and the resulting content was left in place for over a year. Maswimelleu (talk) 22:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maswimelleu, you say I reverted the changes as an IP. Which was your IP? I see vandalism-reversion by 5.64.228.21 (example), and things haven't changed much since then, aside from the hoax tag and a few additional vandalism-fixes. I just want to know what more needs to be watched-out for, and I don't want to protect it with visible vandalism. Nyttend (talk) 22:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article may need to be nuked. The single source it relies on is unreachable and unknown at archive.org. The person described may not exist. New source: [90] Samsara 22:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Maswimelleu: Delete anything you can't find a source for. Samsara 22:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, 5.64.228.21 was my IP, although I don't edit from that location anymore. This evening I am going to delete material that cannot be reached at that source. This is likely to transform the article into a stub. Then I am going to remove the hoax tag. I will add the article to my watchlist to see if the vandal ever returns. This is an example of the vandal editing, in which they made numerous references to British culture and redirected the links present on the page to articles such as 'dog' and 'Jimmy Saville' (the deceased paedophile). Maswimelleu (talk) 07:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Would pending changes be effective? GedUK  12:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That was my first impression as well, before I briefly thought it would need deleting for lack of sources. Right now we have a single source actually accessible. My understanding is that as the individual was given a flag (the event which produced that single source), they are notable as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Notability guide#People. @Maswimelleu: The dog and Saville stuff originated in June 2014 and was never fixed before or during page protection. Samsara 13:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, some of the edits were harder to spot on inspection. I became aware of the page because someone called Thomas Haynes was boasting about vandalising it on social media. I only came back to look at it when I realised that the vandalism was reinstated. Most likely they'll eventually come back with another IP and mess with it again. I may just keep watching it to see if the vandalism is reinstated, and make a new request for protection if the vandalism comes back. Maswimelleu (talk) 14:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please re-report if necessary NeilN talk to me 16:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is targeted continuously by IP vandals. Dave Dial (talk) 20:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 20:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protectionTemplate-protection.Godsy(TALKCONT) 19:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done NeilN talk to me 20:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  15:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It's that time of year again, this page usually gets vandalized this time of year. I think a two-three week protection might be good. Sir Joseph (talk) 16:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taffe316 (talk) 20:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rather odd edit war going on between two IPs changing the user's infobox regarding their gender. . Wildthing61476 (talk) 20:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Man, vandals are weird. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much disruption for year old Bollywood movie. Check recent edits, protection log and pending changes log. I support two years protection. After that the current craze will go down. The Avengers 13:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Including vandalism and other unconstructive edits to BLP articles. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 15:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Musa Talk  15:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Musa Talk  15:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 16:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes: Protecting administrator inactive this time. Some reverts lately, despite low editing. George Ho (talk) 00:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Nothing since the 23 November. Wait for a couple of days and see what happens. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Currently on indefinite pending changes due to joke names being added to the list of members (the article being a long-standing joke for this, before it was cleaned up a couple of years ago). But good-faith-assuming reviewers unfamiliar with the context are occasionally waving through edits that add a single name with a fake source, having no reason not to, so this isn't really working. McGeddon (talk) 11:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected GedUK  13:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Non-autoconfirmed editors keep changing Turkic → Kurdic, cf. article talk page. Sam Sailor Talk! 12:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent unexplained content removal from dynamic IP. Qed237 (talk) 12:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Protection clash, yours won! GedUK  13:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. :p Samsara 13:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring and IP vandalism. Eteethan (talk) 02:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NeilN talk to me 04:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Till December 31. The movie is going to release in December. The Avengers 09:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Check edit history and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?action=view&page=Alan_Turing&type=protect. The Avengers 09:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page was protected for four days in September and then again for 30 days in September and October, and yet the anon IP trolls keep returning to make uncited claims about children in violation of WP:BLP. They refuse to read that policy, refuse to discuss the issue, and refuse to provide even a shred of evidence. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Current event, already multiple vandals and disruptive editors and changes being made to this article. The StormCatcher (talk) 00:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A significant amount of vandalism from IP editors in recent days. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 06:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Kind Tennis Fan, if more occurs please let me know or re-report here. NeilN talk to me 07:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (edit conflict) Samsara 07:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Requesting full protection until dispute resolution seen to consensus. Currently at DRN, however, edit warring at the article has ensued again. -- WV 02:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both editors blocked for 24 hours, since neither one has said anything at the article's talk page. I would have been inclined to protect the page instead if they'd been chatting at talk. Nyttend (talk) 02:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Text replaced with that of the ISIS article four times over the last two days by unregistered IPs using IPVanish (extraneous: likely to be the same person). RogBeGone (talk) 05:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection Page created despite being subjected to A7 criteria, A3 criteria and G12 criteria, see source. The following page must be prevented from re-creation. D'SuperHero (talk) 06:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 07:08, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article was recently protected due to excessive vandalism by all IPs and newly registered accounts who had edited since November 8. Article lasted almost 24 hours after this protection had expired. Same changes as before are happening. AussieLegend () 07:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 07:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring/alleged sockpuppetry. GABHello! 23:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1/365.2425th of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 02:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nyttend, indefinite full protection? --NeilN talk to me 04:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Many IP users switch back and forth between an article and a redirect. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just got bad about ten minutes ago, but persistent disruption since then. Most of these NFL entries cool off in 1-2 days. EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 05:08, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of hoaxes by IP socks of TV5Ozamiz. - 112.198.78.89 (talk) 10:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of another hoaxes by IP socks of TV5Ozamiz. - 112.198.78.89 (talk) 10:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring - Especially with IP editors. Paleocemoski 16:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repetitive BLP vandalism from a vandal with access to multiple IPs. BethNaught (talk) 20:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 71.54.242.55 (talk · contribs) blocked by The Blade of the Northern Lights. Samsara 20:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Highly dynamic IPv6 edit warring content changes. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]