Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 22

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as redundant and unused. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Borndied (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unnecessary. There are a huge amounts of templates for this; see Template:Birth, death and age templates. This one adds nothing, contains outdated formatting such as linking dates, and could be used accidentally.  Liam987(talk) 23:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per precedents indicated by nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lubbock highways (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Added clutter for articles, better served by a category. See precedents at WP:USRD/P#Other debates and Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_February_14#Template:Valdosta_highways. Rschen7754 18:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 March 17Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge/redirectPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WW2InfoBox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is used only in one article (World War II). By the definition of the template, it should be used in more than one article, otherwise it is useless. I propose to substitute the template in the WWII article, and than to delete it. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see a discussion without a consensus. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as a navbox that doesn't aid navigation. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kim Jonghyun (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Jonghyun did not release enough singles/solo material to have his own template. He is notable for his solo career and has done activities outside of SHINee, but he does not need his own template as of yet. Even Sandara Park who released more singles than him does not have a template of her own yet. We need to wait until he has done few more solo releases before he gets his own template. Until then, it's just simply WP:TOOSOON to have his own template. Tibbydibby (talk) 03:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per nom Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Taemin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Taemin is another one here. He is notable outside of SHINee, but he has not released enough material as of yet for him to have his own template. Maybe if he releases another single or two, then perhaps he can get his own template when the time comes. Until then, I suggest that this template gets deleted for now. Even Sandara Park does not have her own template and she has released a few more singles than him. Tibbydibby (talk) 03:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.