Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 13

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 22. Primefac (talk) 00:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Collab was abandoned in 2008 Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated since 2012, unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 22. Primefac (talk) 00:35, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to be supported. I found only five substs of this, all from 2006. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Note that this template has been nominated twice under the "unused" and NENAN criteria, which has now been overruled twice. This template can be renominated, but only if neither of these two criteria are used in the nomination. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, would fail WP:NENAN anyway Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not in use is inaccurate again (previously nominated in June 2017). Hmlarson (talk) 16:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Hmlarson: It still fails WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 17:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's an WP:ESSAY created by... ? Hmlarson (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, only one link which is red Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Malta confirmed participation for the 2017 contest coming up in December. There is good reason for now to assume that the template will expand. That being said, I'm not necessarily implying that this means we should keep the template, I just think that is probably relevant to the decision. — Tuxipεdia(talk) 23:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous title to Template:Fb team Speranța Crihana Veche, Template:Fb team Speranța Nisporeni, and Template:Fb team FC Speranța Drochia. All transclusions were replaced; ready to delete. XXN, 15:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Useless navbox, missing articles for navigation. And even the main article is barely notable so there is not much 'potential'. XXN, 14:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a suitable subject for a navbox. Mostly unlinked/redlinks anyway. --woodensuperman 08:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, mostly redlinks, would fail WP:NENAN even if everything were blue Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, single use template, not relevant Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace since the author has userfied the templates (NAC) Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All unused, nothing but redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:27, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I moved them to a user page until they can be connected to articles. Tomruen (talk) 10:10, 13 October 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear use; "localist independent" is not mentioned in either person's article and even if it were, this would still fail WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, single-use template Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ancient and unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 22. Primefac (talk) 00:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).